Old 07-14-09, 12:12 PM
  #10  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by kendall
Think a lot has to do with riding style.
I am normally in the big ring, 52 on three bikes, 53 on one (just sold it last week) and stick to the smallest three cogs for typical riding. With all but one of the bikes the small ring is in the 42 tooth range, and for me it drops the ratio so far that I'm just not comfortable riding it.
With one bike I have 52 and 46 rings, those extra teeth spread the gearing just enough to give me a wider comfort range. I do have larger cogs on the low-range half of the cog on that bike so I have climbing gears if I need them, but they are seldom used.
There are only a few large hills around here, so it works great, possibly wouldn't make sense at all in more hilly areas.

Ken.
Ken, sounds great for a modern Michigan geartrain!
Road Fan is offline