[QUOTE=erader;9340648]
Originally Posted by
Mr_Christopher
Keep in mind I'm a 99er and a bad one at that. I recall having a VERY vague interest in cycling during the 80s and read where and American finally won the Tour. Cool for Greg LeMond. Fast forward where Greg has become an Armstrong parasite and his whole being is consumed with trying to embaress LA. Fair enough, every man needs a hobby and it seems Greg has found his life's calling - making LA confess to doping.
But now he's using his maths and pulling numbers out of thin air to suggest AC is a doper and he's saying the burden is on AC's shoulders to prove he isn't doping.
What is it with Greg LeMond that makes him such a jerk? Has he always been a jerk?[/QUOTE]
probably but he's certainly gotten worse.
after greg was finished -- he went kicking and screaming BTW -- the hunt was on for
the next greg lemond. there were a couple pretenders and then there was lance armstrong. pre-cancer the rap on armstrong was "he's a good one-day racer but he'll never win the tour".
well you know what happened after that....lance went on to win seven consecutive tours and dwarf the accomplishments of greg lemond.
well lemond couldn't handle not being top dog so after lance won a couple of tours he turned on him and he's become more shrill over the years to become the pathetic individual he is today.
ed rader
Ahhhh, that is where you learned it!