Originally Posted by
25hz
Ellipticals don't smooth out the stroke, in fact, they do the exact opposite. For the same ground speed, when the elliptical approaches the large diameter of the ring, the crank speed slows down. As the ring then passes the large diameter and rotates toward the smallest diameter, the crank speed increases. For the entire pedal rotation, the foot speed is constantly slowing and speeding up. It's noticeable at first, but you quickly get used to it. The more exaggerated the ellipse, the more of the change in pedal speed. Some people have knee problems if the pedal speed change is too much because as the pedalsslow for the high spot, the loading also increases, which can be too much for some knees. The ellipticals are most noticeable for people with bad technique who grind because the acceleration and easing through the dead spot is most noticeable. Ellipticals can help anyone though and the benefits are not diminished with proper pedal technique. While the power output using round rings during a complete pedal rotation would produce something like a sine wave with the actual pedal speed looking like a relatively flat/straight line, using elliptical rings would still produce a power sine wave but the peaks would be longer while the valleys would be shorter. At the same time, it would change the pedal speed line from pretty much flat, to a sine wave also.
Thanks 25Hz, this confirms what I proposed in the original post. Ellipticals, by producing a more linear force-profile where the rubber-meets the road, will facillitate less accellerating/decellerating. I think it's a matter of physics [perhaps a bit of calculus too] to show that a given amount of energy will get us farther/faster if we travel at a constant velocity (after an initial accelleration.)
I appreciate that being able to stand on [df] bicycle peddles is a comfortable action and makes it easier to [apply force to] turn them, but the rider is doing work to step-up on the peddle. Assuming for sake of argument that we're comparing two riders and bikes of the same weight, and doing the same climb, then, whether riding DF or 'bent', we're moving the same weight up the same elevation - which should take the same amount of energy. Unless there's something inherently inefficient about the ergonomics of the bent, shouldn't they be just as fast [up hills]?
I'm beginning to suspect that my Haluzak isn't especially aerodynamic (especially after a df rider coasted past me going down-hill) and would like my next bent to be low-slung. Also suspect that with every change in body/hip/peddle orientation, some leg-muscle re-conditioning may be required.
Re: ellipticals and bents, found these links interesting:
http://www.cruzbike.com/content/worl...-record-holder
http://www.cruzbike.com/Fitting_Elli...ainwheels.html