Originally Posted by
screaminDOHC
Too small? Where do you typically determine the "XXcm" sizing dimension from? Seat tube?
I have 2 other road bikes (vintage), wonder if one of them may fit better.
1984 LeTour - 34" Standover (too big IMO), top tube c-c 57cm, seat tube c-c 62cm
198? Cilo - 31.75" standover, Top tube c-c 56cm, seat tube c-c 56cm.
The Cilo is kind of similar dimensionally to the Trek, but the Geometry is VERY different, and thus *feels* smaller.
Nominal frame size is measured along the seat tube from the center of the crank spindle to either the center of the top tube (c-c, great for specifying frame geometry/angles) or the top of the top tube (c-t, a more pratical guide to how the frame fits the rider, although one has to add bottom bracket elevation to obtain standover height). Top tube length (almost always measured c-c) is arguably even more important in determining how well the bike fits you.
For what it's worth, I am 5" shorter than you and my inseam is 2" shorter, so our respective relative proportions are comparable and pretty average. My ideal size in a traditional European road bike is 55cm C-T.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069