Originally Posted by noisebeam
I am quite puzzled as to the passion in arguing why use of BL when present should be mandatory. It totally boggles my mind as to why anyone would want BLs to be mandatory whereas I do see both sides of the pro/anti-BL debate.
Now to the question:
Why would anyone, especially a cyclist, want the use of BL when present to be mandatory or even mandatory with a list of exceptions? What benefit is gained for the cyclist?
That's precisely my viewpoint as well. I will only support efforts that benefit cyclists. Chipping away at cyclist's rights is not a benefit in my opinion.