Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
There probably are few, if any, CYCLISTS wanting (or advocating FOR) mandatory BL requirements; hence the creation of a straw man argument in order for a few zealots to rant and speculate about other cyclists' motivations.
Then I am puzzled by this thread. I have not read every word in this particular thread, but I do sense a tone of arguement - so I assume that there are folks arguing that BLs be mandatory. I just don't get it - I look to words that people write and am not making any assumptions about others motivations based on their names or whatever. Its seems to me a clear & direct question, do you support mandatory use of BLs or not. If everyone says no, then why the argumentative tone?
Al