Originally Posted by
Bekologist
yep, makes no sense. that's why several states have made this change, and it passed legal scrutiny to make it onto the law books.
yep, no legal sense,
no sense at all to lobby states to change bikelane, shoulder and/or sidepath laws from mandatory use to optional!
sure, no sense at all.
i don't think john HAS a course of action except his own fallacious hysteria and fighting tooth and nail against bike specificity in roadscape. his agenda blinds him.
Provide evidence as to which states retained laws pertaining to bike lanes or bike paths while changing from mandatory statement to permissive use statements. As I have indicated, the case of shoulders is different, because of the interpretation that cyclists were prohibited from using shoulders.