Originally Posted by
genec
Your use of the term "bikeways*" is quite disingenuous and on par with the utterance "let them eat cake.**"
*the broad term bikeways applies to anything for cyclists from a mere line on the traveled roadway, to a narrow meandering path, to a well designed class 1 bicycle highway. The true distinctions are quite obvious, and quite different.
**Enfin je me rappelai le pis-aller d’une grande princesse à qui l’on disait que les paysans n’avaient pas de pain, et qui répondit : Qu’ils mangent de la brioche. J’achetai de la brioche.
You are lying, Genec, and you have done so for a long time. Read the AASHTO Guide for its classification of bikeways. Furthermore, here is the direct quotation from the California Streets and Highways Code that established these definitions:
"890.4. As used in this article, "bikeway" means all facilities that
provide primarily for bicycle travel. For purposes of this article,
bikeways shall be categorized as follows:
(a) Class I bikeways, such as a "bike path," which provide a
completely separated right-of-way designated for the exclusive use of
bicycles and pedestrians with crossflows by motorists minimized.
(b) Class II bikeways, such as a "bike lane," which provide a
restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semiexclusive
use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians
prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians
and motorists permitted.
(c) Class III bikeways, such as an onstreet or offstreet "bike
route," which provide a right-of-way designated by signs or permanent
markings and shared with pedestrians or motorists."
Having to deal, time after time, with these ideological lies and those who present them, has turned this into a den of vipers, unworthy of any effort save that of using the lies to develop an anti-toxin.