Old 03-05-05, 07:50 PM
  #3  
shiftinjon
Jr. High School Student
 
shiftinjon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by John E
The only cogent argument for radial lacing of the left side of a rear wheel was the tension asymmetry imposed by dishing, which of course is not absent on a track wheel. I would simply lace both sides 3X and enjoy the ride.
Tension asymmetry means unequal spoke tension on the drive side and non-drive side, correct?

If the pronoun "which" has "tension asymmetry" as it's object, then "which of course is not absent on a track wheel" means unequal spoke tension is there, right, since if something is not absent, it is present?

So you are saying that unequal tension exists on a track wheel which requires no dish?

Better check that. Doesn't sound to cogent.

Last edited by shiftinjon; 03-05-05 at 08:10 PM.
shiftinjon is offline