View Single Post
Old 09-01-09 | 01:30 PM
  #39  
geoGraphicFTD's Avatar
geoGraphicFTD
double diamond tram girl
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: 406

Bikes: surly cross-check, cannondale CAAD8 optimo 1

My big question is, WHY is average speed such a horrible metric to use? If I shouldn't be monitoring my speed, what IS a good metric to monitor?

I understand that average speed will change depending on route/terrain/etc., but I figure it's a good enough way to tell if I'm getting better. For example, before my first triathlon this past weekend, I rode the tri bike route a couple times a week. When I started, my average speed was 15-16mph, and at the race my speed was 17.2. Probably a good indicator that I am getting better, right?
My computer doesn't include time stopped in average speed, but I really only care about my speed when I'm moving. I can just look at a clock if I'm curious about how long the ride actually took (as opposed to the ride time my computer shows me, which stops timing when I'm stopped).
geoGraphicFTD is offline  
Reply