Old 09-18-09, 07:24 AM
  #14  
JasonC
Senior Member
 
JasonC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 162

Bikes: Trek Pilot 1.0, Giant Sedona (old, winter/rain bike)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
I ride the Marathon Winters myself and they aren't great in anything more than packed snow - they start to slide around. They've worked great for me however, as we have plowed bike paths where I live (minnesota) and I'm not a "required" bike commuter. However, if you already have a set of "real" snow tires, I would be tempted to (as you mentioned) to ride the Schwalbes the 90% of the time that you don't need more than them, and use the Nokian Extremes for everything else. The Schwalbes are great on pure ice, and when pumped up to full pressure roll *nearly* as well on pavement as my non-studded tires do.

While I have not tried it, it's also my understanding that the front tire is the most important for traction, you might only "need" to switch the front tire when conditions get bad (in other words, run a marathon winter on your back tire all the time and switch the front one depending on conditions). I haven't personally tried it yet myself, though.
There are some great points in here.

In riding through non-packed fresh snow, I force myself to slow down and pedal at a higher cadence. It makes a world of difference in stability. But I'm likely preaching to the choir

Also, I am tempted to ride with one Nokian W240 on front for the bad days this year. I figure I dropped $150 last year on my primary set of winter tires, so could afford an extra $75 to see if one better front tire makes things better. Maybe... seems like it could be worth it.

-Jason

Last edited by JasonC; 09-18-09 at 06:13 PM. Reason: never could spell "choir"...
JasonC is offline