Originally Posted by DrPete

Why are the opposing points valid and mine constitute an "agenda?" Is not representing the status quo that frightening? An "agenda?" I would argue that those who have disagreed with me have twisted my words just as effectively. Calling them an agenda is a nice example in fact.

I've actually tried to keep the mod hat off as much as possible, and there have been posts that I think were better off deleted. Hard to do sometimes, I'll admit. And as in any moderating situation, sometimes it's too much, sometimes it's not enough. Just doing the best that I can.

The validity of a point does not make it irrefutable.