View Single Post
Old 09-27-09, 09:10 PM
  #66  
crhilton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by JPprivate
I ran my own numbers partially from the kindly provided link by TandemGeek, partially from other sources.
700 people died cycling but all cyclists make up only .2% of all road miles traveled. (http://bicycleuniverse.info/transpo/almanac.html) Cars (more or less) made up 99.8% of all road miles traveled and accounted for 40,000 deaths. So cars travel 499 times more miles than bikes. If cyclists were to travel as many miles as cars we would have 349,300 bike deaths. Or in other words, every mile traveled by bike is 8.7times more dangerous than the same mile traveled by car.
Please somebody tell me I am wrong here somewhere.
I can tell you that you get different numbers than the studies Kifer cites. I believe Kifer got just under 3 times as dangerous. He used .8% of miles traveled. Interesting.

Per exposure hour, btw, it flips the other way with his numbers.
crhilton is offline