View Single Post
Old 10-04-09 | 04:49 PM
  #69  
Road Fan's Avatar
Road Fan
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by southpawboston
work = force x distance.

if we define work as the flexing of the frame, it takes a certain force applied at a certain distance to generate the work. consider distance to be the length of tubing on a bike frame. the longer the tubing, the more flex is introduced to the tubing by a given force.
Close, but not quite. For a given torque (axial) a tube of a certain length will twist a certain amount. If you put the same torque on a longer tube, the twist will be greater. This assumes the twist is measured by how much the two ends are moved out of line with each other.

It's not really work, though you could say energy is stored in the tube when it's twisted, if it's metal. If it's carbon, a significant amount is dissipated as heat. Still tends to resist twisting.

So in a compact, the top tube is part of the system that resists twist due to pedaling forces and due to hand forces as the rider pulls on the handlebar. Those two couples impart a twist that tends to pull the head and seat tubes out of plane, by twisting the downtube and the top tube. Downtube and seat tube stiffness are important. The top tube is shortened in a compact because it approches perpendicular interface with the seat tube. That would represent the shortest top tube. As an additional stiffness benefit, the seat stays get shorter. A compact will be stiffer than a conventional frame, even if they share the same materials and construction, assuming they have stiff seatposts.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply