why bikes shouldn't be taxed like motorvehicles
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
why bikes shouldn't be taxed like motorvehicles
While reading the paper this morning, I came across an article suggesting that bikes should be taxed just like cars. I am going to send a response as to why they shouldn't be and am looking for suggestions. Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Because, I already own cars. Should we tax shoes too?
...Obviously those damn pedestrians are destroying the roads, making potholes and such ...and don't get me started on this "walkable city" bull****, "more infrastructure, give us side walks!" they shout. Screw that, buy a car and sit in gridlock with the rest of us or get the hell off my lawn.
Sorry, sarcasm seems to be the only way to handle this situation.
...Obviously those damn pedestrians are destroying the roads, making potholes and such ...and don't get me started on this "walkable city" bull****, "more infrastructure, give us side walks!" they shout. Screw that, buy a car and sit in gridlock with the rest of us or get the hell off my lawn.
Sorry, sarcasm seems to be the only way to handle this situation.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 481
Bikes: 2014 Giant Roam
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The easy answer is because they are green, dont burn fossil fuels, safer, quieter etc. Seems like simple answers but when confronting a town board or policy makers 3rd grade simplistic arguments seem to work. As if they were just waiting for someone to come in and state the obvious. Dont overlook it though non bikers may not think much about the world of bikes and need someone to tell them the basic arguments. How exactly are cars taxed? Sales tax? Thats not more for cars than anything else as far as I'm aware and you pay sales tax on your bike for certain. Tax on gas is not tax on car. So what other taxed like cars are they even talking about?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,033
Bikes: I own N+1 bikes, where N=0.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Much of the cost of road building and maintenance comes from the general tax fund. Bicyclists pay those taxes like anyone else. Typically, their tax contributions to maintenance already outweigh the cost of the wear and tear that results from the use of their bicycles on the road, so they're already subsidizing motor vehicle use.
Bicyclists receive a disproportionately smaller benefit from taxpayer subsidized "free" parking. They similarly subsidize parking for motorists at privately owned stores with parking lots by having to pay the same price for goods that motorists pay, despite not requiring a full parking space.
Bicyclists receive a disproportionately smaller benefit from taxpayer subsidized "free" parking. They similarly subsidize parking for motorists at privately owned stores with parking lots by having to pay the same price for goods that motorists pay, despite not requiring a full parking space.
#6
Banned
You Off Planet?
sales Exise, and Fuel tax per gallon and service , another sales tax.
then comes the extra taxes thru citations by the police for operating violations.
little taxes needed because of all the Income Taxes on the 1% & multinational corporations that are reduced by their funding their politicians.
sales Exise, and Fuel tax per gallon and service , another sales tax.
then comes the extra taxes thru citations by the police for operating violations.
little taxes needed because of all the Income Taxes on the 1% & multinational corporations that are reduced by their funding their politicians.
#7
Touring Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 278
Bikes: 23" Schwinn High Plains, 20" Trek 830 Antelope
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
License/registration. Additionally, sometimes there are specific road use taxes levied depending on the type of vehicle that is a part of the registration.
Further, sometimes a state/municipality levies an additional tax/fee for vehicles purchased outside of the state which may or may not trickle down to local/county road maintenance funds.
Further, sometimes a state/municipality levies an additional tax/fee for vehicles purchased outside of the state which may or may not trickle down to local/county road maintenance funds.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,257
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18424 Post(s)
Liked 15,582 Times
in
7,337 Posts
Thought this thread might require extra. At least three tubs if it had been started in the A&S forum.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
To maximize revenue, bicycles should be taxed on a per mile basis. Require each rider to fill out a form indicating the miles ridden to compute the tax. Bike riders love to lie about how much they ride so the tax money would pour in.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
If I could trust the money would go to biking infrastructure, I'd be all for it. I try to make it to charity events that support the various trails, biking promotion groups, etc., and wouldn't balk at a license plate that goes to support such activities.
As to why they shouldn't? I'm far more inclined to believe the money will get wasted protecting some tadpole that only lives in one single mud puddle than used for its intended purposes.
As to why they shouldn't? I'm far more inclined to believe the money will get wasted protecting some tadpole that only lives in one single mud puddle than used for its intended purposes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
The basic answer is that bicycles should not be taxed like motor vehicles because they don't cause the wear and tear on city streets like motor vehicles do. Potholes are caused by numerous 1-ton vehicles going down that street, not so much by a 200 lb. man on a 30 lb. bicycle. Not to mention the fact that bicycles are non-polluting and quiet.
Just how much tax revenue do they think the government would rake in by taxing bicycles?
Just how much tax revenue do they think the government would rake in by taxing bicycles?
#12
Senior Member
With declining gas tax revenues, general tax payer funding is increasingly required for road upkeep. To that extent, bikes likely pay their fair share, since bikes contribute no significant wear to roads. The only real bicycling cost is upkeep of dedicated bicycle-only infrastructure, which is basically non-existent in the US. Yes, bike lanes are painted on roads, but the repair schedule is entirely dictated by the overall road condition (with wear from cars/trucks). Other things are typically multi-use paths, in case, we should equally tax shoes.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Central IL
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The average new car weighs over 2 tons (4000 lbs). The average 1/2 ton pickup truck is approaching 3 tons (6000 lbs).
#15
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,792
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3591 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
1,935 Posts
In Wisconsin last year, there was a proposal to put a $25 tax on all bicycle sales. This is the letter I sent Rep. Nygren and my Assemblywoman and State Senator:
Hon. John Nygren:
I read with interest and concern your proposal to enact a $25 tax on new bicycle sales, ostensibly to end a supposed “free ride” bicyclists enjoy on Wisconsin’s roads. My concerns include the following:
1) Many of the roads bicyclists use are paid for by property taxes, not the fuel tax, so any cyclist who pays property tax is already paying for road building. Since bicycles cause far less wear on the roads than motor vehicles and require less pavement, parking, etc. a person who uses their bicycle for transportation is likely actually subsidizing those who use cars exclusively.
2) The proposed tax is highly regressive. A person who can only afford a $100 WalMart bike pays a $25 tax -- 25% of the bicycle’s cost. But a person who can afford to buy a high-end $6,000 Trek bicycle pays the same $25 tax -- only 0.42% of the bicycle’s cost.
3) Since wear and tear on our roads is roughly proportional to vehicle weight, why not apportion the tax in a way that reflects this reality? Propose a uniform tax on all new vehicles -- cars, trucks, motorcycles, and bicycles -- based on vehicle weight. This would place the burden of maintaining our roads on the users who impose the most wear on the roads.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns
Sincerely,
John D Thompson
Hon. John Nygren:
I read with interest and concern your proposal to enact a $25 tax on new bicycle sales, ostensibly to end a supposed “free ride” bicyclists enjoy on Wisconsin’s roads. My concerns include the following:
1) Many of the roads bicyclists use are paid for by property taxes, not the fuel tax, so any cyclist who pays property tax is already paying for road building. Since bicycles cause far less wear on the roads than motor vehicles and require less pavement, parking, etc. a person who uses their bicycle for transportation is likely actually subsidizing those who use cars exclusively.
2) The proposed tax is highly regressive. A person who can only afford a $100 WalMart bike pays a $25 tax -- 25% of the bicycle’s cost. But a person who can afford to buy a high-end $6,000 Trek bicycle pays the same $25 tax -- only 0.42% of the bicycle’s cost.
3) Since wear and tear on our roads is roughly proportional to vehicle weight, why not apportion the tax in a way that reflects this reality? Propose a uniform tax on all new vehicles -- cars, trucks, motorcycles, and bicycles -- based on vehicle weight. This would place the burden of maintaining our roads on the users who impose the most wear on the roads.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns
Sincerely,
John D Thompson
#17
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
In Wisconsin last year, there was a proposal to put a $25 tax on all bicycle sales. This is the letter I sent Rep. Nygren and my Assemblywoman and State Senator:
Hon. John Nygren:
I read with interest and concern your proposal to enact a $25 tax on new bicycle sales, ostensibly to end a supposed “free ride” bicyclists enjoy on Wisconsin’s roads. My concerns include the following:
1) Many of the roads bicyclists use are paid for by property taxes, not the fuel tax, so any cyclist who pays property tax is already paying for road building. Since bicycles cause far less wear on the roads than motor vehicles and require less pavement, parking, etc. a person who uses their bicycle for transportation is likely actually subsidizing those who use cars exclusively.
2) The proposed tax is highly regressive. A person who can only afford a $100 WalMart bike pays a $25 tax -- 25% of the bicycle’s cost. But a person who can afford to buy a high-end $6,000 Trek bicycle pays the same $25 tax -- only 0.42% of the bicycle’s cost.
3) Since wear and tear on our roads is roughly proportional to vehicle weight, why not apportion the tax in a way that reflects this reality? Propose a uniform tax on all new vehicles -- cars, trucks, motorcycles, and bicycles -- based on vehicle weight. This would place the burden of maintaining our roads on the users who impose the most wear on the roads.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns
Sincerely,
John D Thompson
Hon. John Nygren:
I read with interest and concern your proposal to enact a $25 tax on new bicycle sales, ostensibly to end a supposed “free ride” bicyclists enjoy on Wisconsin’s roads. My concerns include the following:
1) Many of the roads bicyclists use are paid for by property taxes, not the fuel tax, so any cyclist who pays property tax is already paying for road building. Since bicycles cause far less wear on the roads than motor vehicles and require less pavement, parking, etc. a person who uses their bicycle for transportation is likely actually subsidizing those who use cars exclusively.
2) The proposed tax is highly regressive. A person who can only afford a $100 WalMart bike pays a $25 tax -- 25% of the bicycle’s cost. But a person who can afford to buy a high-end $6,000 Trek bicycle pays the same $25 tax -- only 0.42% of the bicycle’s cost.
3) Since wear and tear on our roads is roughly proportional to vehicle weight, why not apportion the tax in a way that reflects this reality? Propose a uniform tax on all new vehicles -- cars, trucks, motorcycles, and bicycles -- based on vehicle weight. This would place the burden of maintaining our roads on the users who impose the most wear on the roads.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns
Sincerely,
John D Thompson
This would have been my letter.
Dear Assemblywoman/Senator/Representative
I read with interest and concern your proposal to enact a $25 tax on new bicycle sales. If you continue to support this legislation I will vote for your opponent in the next election and encourage my family, friends, coworkers and acquaintances to do the same.
Yours,
TimothyH
I read with interest and concern your proposal to enact a $25 tax on new bicycle sales. If you continue to support this legislation I will vote for your opponent in the next election and encourage my family, friends, coworkers and acquaintances to do the same.
Yours,
TimothyH
-Tim-
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
Rather than tax cyclist, mount camera's on all bikes that can get plate numbers and send tickets to all passing motor vehicles that violate minimum passing distances. I don't know about the rest of you but I'd bring in some $$$$ for the counties.
#21
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
Some posters forget that bike lanes often are part of the road structure. I just went past an older four lane road that needed repaving last time I saw it. Now it's been resurfaced but it's two lanes with a center turn lane and bike lanes added. That's really nice but car tax helped pay for that. So it's probably fair that bicycles help pay for maintenance.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,883
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
Moderator's note: This post in its original form violated bikeforms.net policy on the use of copyrighted material.
Cyclists vs. drivers: Who pays their fair share?
"Freeloader!" the driver yells out his window
Cyclists vs. drivers: Who pays their fair share?
"Freeloader!" the driver yells out his window
Last edited by unterhausen; 05-18-16 at 04:44 PM.
#23
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,700 Times
in
2,520 Posts
I do pay taxes on my bike just like I do on my car. I pay gas taxes for all the gas I put in it, and I pay sales tax when I buy it. In addition t the infrastructure subsidies of cars that people often note, we have significantly more emergency services, court cases, and police patrols than we would if everyone rode a bike or a bus. It's these hidden subsidies that really add up.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,033
Bikes: I own N+1 bikes, where N=0.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some posters forget that bike lanes often are part of the road structure. I just went past an older four lane road that needed repaving last time I saw it. Now it's been resurfaced but it's two lanes with a center turn lane and bike lanes added. That's really nice but car tax helped pay for that. So it's probably fair that bicycles help pay for maintenance.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18380 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
I might be willing to pay $5 a year (for one bike, or for all bikes) if the state could reduce theft and guarantee that I could leave my bicycle outside a store unlocked and have it be there when I came back out.
As it is, millions of dollars worth of bikes are stolen each year. A few are recovered, but there is never a big effort to prevent theft, and to hunt down bike thieves once a bike is stolen.
As it is, millions of dollars worth of bikes are stolen each year. A few are recovered, but there is never a big effort to prevent theft, and to hunt down bike thieves once a bike is stolen.