Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

At a loss for words

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

At a loss for words

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-17, 05:25 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by coominya
One could, but we both know that's not the underlying motivation don't we.
Perhaps not for you but for myself, safety is the number one priority. I have several lights I go through where having a 'green' with the right of way has very little influence on whether I proceed through the intersection.

I think there was a quote from the Pirates of the Caribbean that is applicable: "The code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules"
gregf83 is offline  
Old 09-14-17, 06:54 PM
  #52  
On Holiday
 
Hoopdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,014

Bikes: A bunch of old steel bikes

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
Neither did the 70+ year old man turning out of the parking lot. I'm on the main road, I have right of way, he has a stop sign and he didn't even slow down for the stop sign. In fact, I think he sped up. I had to stop on a dime and I screamed at the top of my lungs "****ER!!!" Not yelled, screamed, the whole voice raised by an octave or two that can only be done in extreme situations or by actresses in horror flicks.
I've done the same yell on many occasions, and sometimes it results in the driver freaking out as yours did. I have to say though that this sort of driving behaviour is common in all ages of drivers. Right of way means nothing. Expect any driver do do the worst thing possible for your safety and plan an escape route.

Also, get hubby on a bike out in traffic and he'll catch on.
Hoopdriver is offline  
Old 09-14-17, 07:10 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Washington Grove, Maryland
Posts: 1,466

Bikes: 2003 (24)20-Speed Specialized Allez'

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
So PT hurt, PT hurt a lot, and afterwards I headed off to the restaurant. Met with the hubby, told him about the old man, told him PT hurt, and yada yada. Apparently at some point my husband has passed me on the road, maybe even today since I left home before he did going in the same direction, and he asked a few questions. How long does it take for me to get to work, what's my average speed, things like that. Then he asked "Why do you ride in the middle of the lane instead of to the far right?" That question means he must have seen me on the road, and I explained about visibility from behind, how drivers mistake distances and think they can safely pass without ceding any of the lane which leads to increased buzzing, and other safety/visibility issues.

And then my intelligent and well educated husband asked "Why don't you just ride on the sidewalk like everyone else?" Wha??? You've had a driver's license longer than I have, honey. You've been living with me the last 2½ months, honey. Legal responsibility, legal rights, lack of continuous sidewalks, lack of pedestrian crosswalks, not wanting a $70 fine, you've been hearing it all for 2½ months, honey. How can you even ask that question??

If the live-in spouse of a daily commuting cyclist can think the sidewalk is the place for a bicycle, what hope is there of educating motorists at large?
I genuinely wonder who wins the Grand Prize. For being totally clueless about the rights, and safety of cyclists' .....your husband, or the errant driver.
Chris0516 is offline  
Old 09-14-17, 09:08 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 711
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by atbman
Then you should try comparing the accident rates for senior citizen drivers c/w teen to mid 20s drivers. They're far lower. I speak as a 77 year old with a clean licence, max no claims discount, and no collisions in 50 years, so I'm a bit biased.
Yes, biased, because I think us younger folks have plenty of personal experience with older relatives that shouldn't be on the road but are. I am presuming that since you are on this forum, you also ride a bike and are in great physical and mental shape. However many people your age aren't, and there's no sugar-coating that the probability of an older person being unsafe to drive due to mental disability is far, far more probable than any other age group. A fair number of older people have some sort of mental decline, a decline that just isn't near as likely for the Gen X or younger crowds.

When the auto accident statistics are crunched, yes teens and early 20-somethings have a higher accident rate, but seniors have the second highest accident rates, and the reasons are far different. Teens and 20-somethings do stupid crap. They still have a belief in their own immortality and don't weigh risk very well. Plus they don't have the experience behind the wheel to know things us older folks know. Seniors get into accidents because of failures in mind and body. They can't move a failing body fast enough to react, or the failing senses don't get information to the brain in time, or cognitive declines make them not react appropriately. And while teens and 20-somethings get better over time if they survive and learn, seniors get worse because the body and mind get worse over time.

For purposes of this thread, I don't know if the guy's age was a factor. I don't. It was just one of those details my mind noted when he was THIS CLOSE to me because he didn't even bother to slow down for the stop sign. Maybe he's a freaking idiot and just didn't see me and saw there wasn't another person on that road to yield to. Maybe he's old and his eyesight is failing and that's why he didn't see me. I don't know. If he was stopping because he thought my scream meant he hit me, and if I had realized it and stopped to have a little heart to heart, I would be able to make an educated guess. But I didn't, so I don't know.
rachel120 is offline  
Old 09-14-17, 09:38 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 711
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris0516
I genuinely wonder who wins the Grand Prize. For being totally clueless about the rights, and safety of cyclists' .....your husband, or the errant driver.
Definitely the driver. Hands down the driver. I've had three close calls including this one, one I'm certain was deliberate, two clueless, and this was the absolute closest. The other clueless I had plenty of reaction time, only risk to me was a blood vessel popping from the blood pressure ticking upward, and the deliberate I would have been hit if he hadn't changed his mind, but it would have been broadside at low speed. My leg would have ended up trapped between the bike and the side of his car and that would have had the most damage, I'd have been knocked on my side and lots of road rash. But this....I really think I would have been very, very badly hurt or even could have been killed. It would have either been a t-bone into my side or nearly head-on, and since he didn't even slow down for the stop sign it would have been at about him doing 20-25mph and in a position where I would have smashed into his windshield or been knocked down and his tires going over me.

But for my husband, it was just very, very surprising since I know I've said at some point early on when drivers honking still was a new annoyance "What, do they want me to break the law?" So I figured he remembered the part about "break the law".

(And a bit of insight that came to me today as to why motorists drive me nuts when they pass on the right and honk and anything else that isn't appropriate pass-on-the-left-when-safe driving. It's what we learned in kindergarten, stay in line and wait your turn, and people who forget the lessons from kindergarten and want to cut by going on the right or honking at me are basically breaking those rules. It's why I have always hated "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" and customers that complain the most are jumped ahead of customers who are quietly patient and therefore cutting in line. It's also why when I'm a pedestrian I'll wait if someone who doesn't notice me violates my right of way, but when I am sure the motorist does see me but is counting on me not challenging him, I'll step out and he has to decide if he wants the premeditation of attempted first degree murder or if he's going to brake, and then I'll walk super-slow while he's stopped and screaming at me. Wait your turn.)
rachel120 is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 12:10 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Washington Grove, Maryland
Posts: 1,466

Bikes: 2003 (24)20-Speed Specialized Allez'

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
Definitely the driver. Hands down the driver. I've had three close calls including this one, one I'm certain was deliberate, two clueless, and this was the absolute closest. The other clueless I had plenty of reaction time, only risk to me was a blood vessel popping from the blood pressure ticking upward, and the deliberate I would have been hit if he hadn't changed his mind, but it would have been broadside at low speed. My leg would have ended up trapped between the bike and the side of his car and that would have had the most damage, I'd have been knocked on my side and lots of road rash. But this....I really think I would have been very, very badly hurt or even could have been killed. It would have either been a t-bone into my side or nearly head-on, and since he didn't even slow down for the stop sign it would have been at about him doing 20-25mph and in a position where I would have smashed into his windshield or been knocked down and his tires going over me.
True. The bad drivers outnumber your husband by far.
Originally Posted by rachel120
But for my husband, it was just very, very surprising since I know I've said at some point early on when drivers honking still was a new annoyance "What, do they want me to break the law?" So I figured he remembered the part about "break the law".
True, I keep having to remind my family about the law. They think it is so easy. To ride the way they want me to ride.
Originally Posted by rachel120
(And a bit of insight that came to me today as to why motorists drive me nuts when they pass on the right and honk and anything else that isn't appropriate pass-on-the-left-when-safe driving. It's what we learned in kindergarten, stay in line and wait your turn, and people who forget the lessons from kindergarten and want to cut by going on the right or honking at me are basically breaking those rules. It's why I have always hated "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" and customers that complain the most are jumped ahead of customers who are quietly patient and therefore cutting in line. It's also why when I'm a pedestrian I'll wait if someone who doesn't notice me violates my right of way, but when I am sure the motorist does see me but is counting on me not challenging him, I'll step out and he has to decide if he wants the premeditation of attempted first degree murder or if he's going to brake, and then I'll walk super-slow while he's stopped and screaming at me. Wait your turn.)
I agree 100%
Chris0516 is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 12:59 AM
  #57  
If you brake you dont win
 
Nooner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Inland Empire
Posts: 103

Bikes: Santa Cruz Bronson, Trek Remedy 9.8, Cervelo S3, Kona Big Honzo, Cannondale R500, DiamondBack Apex, one storage unit my wife knows nothing about, and one ball crushing unicycle for kicks

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
Well then, here's an open question to everyone. Why is it that when I'm in a car, I have every right and every reason to expect other motorists to obey the law and react appropriately...
I'm not sure why you would expect that.
Most folks break laws when driving at one point or another.
See example below.




Originally Posted by rachel120
That road is a 4 lane divided highway, the speed limit is 40mph but is routinely violated by 10mph or more (I've driven that road at 50mph and been passed by many, many cars going faster) and the road is a government encouraged bypass of a major US highway.
Nooner is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 07:05 AM
  #58  
Full Member
 
55murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 207 Post(s)
Liked 108 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
Well then, here's an open question to everyone. Why is it that when I'm in a car, I have every right and every reason to expect other motorists to obey the law and react appropriately, and when I'm on foot I have every right and every reason to expect motorists to obey the law and react appropriately, but I lose that when I choose to use a bicycle? What are so special about bicycles that I have less expectations and less protection than when I am on foot crossing an intersection?
Look at it this way- you do indeed have every legal and moral expectation for motorists to obey the law and react appropriately. But on the practical level, that attitude will get you killed eventually. You cannot expect motorists to behave. Ever. My three rules:

1. Assume you are invisible
2. Never think you are safe
3. Have an escape plan at all times

Originally Posted by wphamilton
...I learned some things, and that situation does no longer arise. In addition, there are many events - perhaps daily, I don't know - that would upset me in the beginning but I don't even take note of now. Perceptions change.
+1
55murray is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 07:44 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
raqball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,345
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Liked 221 Times in 121 Posts
Originally Posted by 55murray
Look at it this way- you do indeed have every legal and moral expectation for motorists to obey the law and react appropriately. But on the practical level, that attitude will get you killed eventually. You cannot expect motorists to behave. Ever. My three rules:

1. Assume you are invisible
2. Never think you are safe
3. Have an escape plan at all times
raqball is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 07:53 AM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
coominya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Brisbane Aust
Posts: 1,643

Bikes: Giant ToughRoad Giant talon

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 705 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by gregf83
Perhaps not for you but for myself, safety is the number one priority. I have several lights I go through where having a 'green' with the right of way has very little influence on whether I proceed through the intersection.
What does being careful when you ride through a green have anything to do with blowing stop signs? We all do that, even in the car I do that. If I had a dog in the car it would do that. And why do you assume safety is not the number one priority for me? Is it because I advocate stopping at stop signs where you clearly don't? If you or anyone wants to run red lights and stop signs (in the name of safety) feel free, but don't come here crying when a cop gives you a fine or when a driver abuses you for breaking road laws.
coominya is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 08:16 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by coominya
What does being careful when you ride through a green have anything to do with blowing stop signs? We all do that, even in the car I do that. If I had a dog in the car it would do that. And why do you assume safety is not the number one priority for me? Is it because I advocate stopping at stop signs where you clearly don't? If you or anyone wants to run red lights and stop signs (in the name of safety) feel free, but don't come here crying when a cop gives you a fine or when a driver abuses you for breaking road laws.
It's simply a question of priorities. I value safety over blind obedience to signs or signals.

Like most people, I tend to go with the flow. If I'm on the highway with a bunch of cars it's generally safest to drive at the same speed as everyone else. I know there are a few drivers who rigidly adhere to the speed limit even when everyone around them is going faster. Similarly, few drivers or cyclists around here come to a complete stop at stop signs. We seem to survive.

I try and apply logic and ride in a reasonable way without jeopardizing safety. For example, if I'm riding in the shoulder coming up to a red light and I need to turn right and the shoulder continues I'll just keep going without stopping as there's no logical or safety related reason to stop. Same thing at a T intersection where it make sense to go straight through. Around here they even end the painted stop lines before the shoulding implying that it's not necessary for cyclists to stop.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 08:58 AM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Same thing at a T intersection where it make sense to go straight through. Around here they even end the painted stop lines before the shoulding implying that it's not necessary for cyclists to stop.
If it makes you feel better you can indeed infer that. It wasn't in any way implied however.

In Massachusetts, we are considering adopting what I'll call the Paris Red.

Originally Posted by S1905
SECTION 15. Section 11B of chapter 85 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended in the first paragraph by inserting the following words at the end thereof:-
...
(5) A bicyclist must come to a stop at a red light signal but may... proceed straight with caution if there is no way to the right, provided, however, that they must yield to pedestrians.
-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Old 09-15-17, 02:58 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
WNCGoater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 931

Bikes: Diamondback Century 3. Marin Four Corners

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 416 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
If I have right of way in a car and take it, I have the completely reasonable expectation that the person at the stop sign will yield to me. If I have right of way on foot and take it, I have the completely reasonable expectation that the car at the stop sign will yield to me. Why is it that in this thread it seems that if I'm on a bicycle, the expectation that the car at the stop sign will yield to me is no longer reasonable?
Oh all of those are reasonable expectations, even on a bike. But I wouldn't stake my life on it's going to happen. To assume it's going to happen could get you killed regardless if you're driving, walking or riding.

And because of that....

Originally Posted by 55murray
Look at it this way- you do indeed have every legal and moral expectation for motorists to obey the law and react appropriately. But on the practical level, that attitude will get you killed eventually. You cannot expect motorists to behave. Ever. My three rules:

1. Assume you are invisible
2. Never think you are safe
3. Have an escape plan at all times

+1
^^This^^^


Personally, I believe we have fallen behind on cycling advocacy. The "Share the Road" campaign was somewhat effective, yet I rarely see new signs going up. Public perception is skewed because they aren't being educated. We should be organized in every county in every state, advocating for public education/information campaigns on a state level, addressing cyclists legal right to be on the road, and a motorist's requirement to recognize and give space. There are laws now in every state IIRC, that categorizes bicycles as vehicles giving them legal right to the lane, but motorists don't seem to know that. In NC, you must give 3' space (which is too close) when passing and yield behind the bike until it's safe to pass...but I doubt the motoring public for the most part, is aware of that. There are other countries in the world where bikes are much more accepted/tolerated....perception.

If we spent half as much energy organizing ourselves and lobbying for public information campaigns on the state level to educate, as we do on internet forums complaining about clueless motorists, we may eventually see a shift in attitudes.

Last edited by WNCGoater; 09-15-17 at 03:01 PM.
WNCGoater is offline  
Old 09-18-17, 09:55 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
Yes, biased, because I think us younger folks have plenty of personal experience with older relatives that shouldn't be on the road but are. I am presuming that since you are on this forum, you also ride a bike and are in great physical and mental shape. However many people your age aren't, and there's no sugar-coating that the probability of an older person being unsafe to drive due to mental disability is far, far more probable than any other age group. A fair number of older people have some sort of mental decline, a decline that just isn't near as likely for the Gen X or younger crowds.

When the auto accident statistics are crunched, yes teens and early 20-somethings have a higher accident rate, but seniors have the second highest accident rates, and the reasons are far different. Teens and 20-somethings do stupid crap. They still have a belief in their own immortality and don't weigh risk very well. Plus they don't have the experience behind the wheel to know things us older folks know. Seniors get into accidents because of failures in mind and body. They can't move a failing body fast enough to react, or the failing senses don't get information to the brain in time, or cognitive declines make them not react appropriately. And while teens and 20-somethings get better over time if they survive and learn, seniors get worse because the body and mind get worse over time.

For purposes of this thread, I don't know if the guy's age was a factor. I don't. It was just one of those details my mind noted when he was THIS CLOSE to me because he didn't even bother to slow down for the stop sign. Maybe he's a freaking idiot and just didn't see me and saw there wasn't another person on that road to yield to. Maybe he's old and his eyesight is failing and that's why he didn't see me. I don't know. If he was stopping because he thought my scream meant he hit me, and if I had realized it and stopped to have a little heart to heart, I would be able to make an educated guess. But I didn't, so I don't know.
However accident stats prove that the teen drivers are by far the most accident prone. Especially these days with smart phones that they cant seem to put down for more than 10 seconds.
rydabent is offline  
Old 09-18-17, 10:54 AM
  #65  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Boston-ish
Posts: 225

Bikes: Trek 800 Sport,Cavelo Gara

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rachel120
Nearly every state makes it illegal to ride your bike on the sidewalk. The few that don't outright ban it make it legal only in certain circumstances and the default is illegal unless specifically legalized. My state makes it legal only if the local government makes it legal, and after combing through more traffic studies than I thought could exist for a tiny county, the verdict is that actual sidewalks are pedestrian only and bikes are permitted only on "hiker/biker trails".

Basically in the eyes of the law we are road vehicles. We are cars without motors and not enough wheels. Bicycles being on sidewalks are the same as jumping your car up over the curb onto one.


Actually, only Alabama, Georgia, Maryland, New Hampshire, and Wyoming make it explicitly illegal, with exceptions for children (most), and in at least some cases can be overruled by local ordinance.


Reference: https://bikeleague.org/sites/default/...iding_Laws.pdf


That said, the first year that I commuted by bicycle (last year), I did a fair amount of sidewalk riding. This year, a lot less.
NewATBikeComute is offline  
Old 09-18-17, 11:08 AM
  #66  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 711
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
However accident stats prove that the teen drivers are by far the most accident prone. Especially these days with smart phones that they cant seem to put down for more than 10 seconds.
Yes, I don't argue against that. However as teens survive their stupidity they get better, as accident rates drop as the ages get higher....until you get to the senior crowd. They have the second highest accident rate and when seniors are subdivided, the numbers get higher as the age groups get higher.

The teenage and young adult brain is still in development, leading to higher impulsiveness, and they just don't have experience behind the wheel. Where an older person would know to focus on the road, a teen/young adult will think they are focused on the road enough when distracted by technology or passengers. Also in a dicey situation, someone whose been driving for a while will be more cautious and wait where someone without experience would think "I can make it".

But on the other hand old people really do get failing bodies that make reaction difficult (checking a blind spot, moving feet between pedals) and cognitive declines are sneaky, your brain thinks everything is fine when it really isn't, same issue as someone experiencing a hallucination or delusion. So people with cognitive declines can't realize it's time to give up the car keys as the mind is trapped in a perception of reality that doesn't actually match reality. So seniors become more and more dangerous as their bodies and minds age and fall prey to all the parts wearing out.
rachel120 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davethelefty
Fifty Plus (50+)
24
02-03-19 11:22 AM
Matt74
Advocacy & Safety
4
06-27-18 12:43 PM
Hiro11
Road Cycling
58
05-04-15 02:48 PM
vic303
Fifty Plus (50+)
8
04-17-12 09:38 PM
I_like_cereal
Commuting
4
01-10-12 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.