Best strategy to defend against cars passing blind?
#27
Senior Member
My only concern when a driver passes me is that I have enough clearance. Otherwise, my second concern is to be a witness in a head on collision and me testifying to the driver's carelessness.
However if the blind pass is coming at me from the opposite direction, there's nothing I can do no matter how far right I ride.
However if the blind pass is coming at me from the opposite direction, there's nothing I can do no matter how far right I ride.
#28
☢
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
I try not to worry about cars passing, although I do know there is increased risk to themselves and innocent oncomming traffic when they pass on blind corners.
By riding to the right, the cars can potentially safely pass within the driving lane (especially if there is a good shoulder). Or, at least not move too far out of the lane. At least regular cars. Trucks, buses, and pickups towing trailers need to give more space, but don't always think that way.
If there are two cyclists, then a car can "lane split", and pass between the two cyclists. Hopefully a cyclist coming around a blind corner isn't insisting on "taking the lane".
However, my last trip to Crater Lake was scary. Rough road surface. Descents at 40+ MPH. Narrow road and no shoulders. Drop-off without guard rails to my right. I had to be in the middle of the lane. Reasonable visibility, but uphill traffic still chose to pass other cyclists taking up half of my lane. Apparently the drivers couldn't understand that I couldn't ride 2 or 3 inches from oblivion.
For my normal commutes, in places like a narrow bridge, I'll give a stop signal (left hand out and down at 45°, open palm), if I see a potential conflict, and the cars seem to respect that. When it is clear, I'll wave them on.
A few times a year, I'll have cars pass another car, taking up my full lane. I wave to try to indicate "I'M HERE", but the drivers don't seem to care.
I think some of it is just poor driver training. 90% of the drivers are OK, so additional enforcement probably won't do anything, although perhaps I should start streaming video, and convince the police to send 1 warning followed by a ticked for repeat offenses.
By riding to the right, the cars can potentially safely pass within the driving lane (especially if there is a good shoulder). Or, at least not move too far out of the lane. At least regular cars. Trucks, buses, and pickups towing trailers need to give more space, but don't always think that way.
If there are two cyclists, then a car can "lane split", and pass between the two cyclists. Hopefully a cyclist coming around a blind corner isn't insisting on "taking the lane".
However, my last trip to Crater Lake was scary. Rough road surface. Descents at 40+ MPH. Narrow road and no shoulders. Drop-off without guard rails to my right. I had to be in the middle of the lane. Reasonable visibility, but uphill traffic still chose to pass other cyclists taking up half of my lane. Apparently the drivers couldn't understand that I couldn't ride 2 or 3 inches from oblivion.
For my normal commutes, in places like a narrow bridge, I'll give a stop signal (left hand out and down at 45°, open palm), if I see a potential conflict, and the cars seem to respect that. When it is clear, I'll wave them on.
A few times a year, I'll have cars pass another car, taking up my full lane. I wave to try to indicate "I'M HERE", but the drivers don't seem to care.
I think some of it is just poor driver training. 90% of the drivers are OK, so additional enforcement probably won't do anything, although perhaps I should start streaming video, and convince the police to send 1 warning followed by a ticked for repeat offenses.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,994
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
523 Posts
I think it was @FBinNY who mentioned taking a road position that appears, at first, to prevent a pass, but once the overtaking traffic has slowed (as they must) down, allowing them to pass by moving further right. This is a very good compromise, I think, and I suspect a lot of cyclists ride this way instinctively. I do. The speed of the pass is much more dangerous than the distance of the pass. Anything you can do to avoid cars blasting past at the posted speed limit is safer for you. Anything you can do to avoid cars having to cross the centerline is good for them, and you. It really is unreasonable to believe that cars must wait for who knows how long before conditions become safe enough for a given cyclist to cede the travel lane. The driver doesn't know you. They don't know whether you know safe if it jumped up and bit you you know where, or not.
#32
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
All of the good and questionable advice aside, if a car/truck is in the process of passing you while straddling the center line, or completely in the other lane (in the scenario described by the OP), and another vehicle suddenly pops around the corner in the opposite lane (likely speeding), 100% of motorists, no matter their training, will "happily" run over a cyclist to avoid a head-on collision with a UPS truck.
No one so far has "solved" this problem for the OP. Because there isn't a cycling solution.
No one so far has "solved" this problem for the OP. Because there isn't a cycling solution.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
All of the good and questionable advice aside, if a car/truck is in the process of passing you while straddling the center line, or completely in the other lane (in the scenario described by the OP), and another vehicle suddenly pops around the corner in the opposite lane (likely speeding), 100% of motorists, no matter their training, will "happily" run over a cyclist to avoid a head-on collision with a UPS truck.
No one so far has "solved" this problem for the OP. Because there isn't a cycling solution.
No one so far has "solved" this problem for the OP. Because there isn't a cycling solution.
Of course, if there is a shoulder, and the cyclist is riding on the shoulder (or moves onto the shoulder as vehicles approach), then if the car or truck or tractor-trailer cuts back in, then they won't hit the cyclist unless they over-shoot onto the shoulder. Even riding on the fog line is a foot or so further right than most drivers actually drive.
#34
☢
The only thing worst than getting hit by a car, is to get hit then find you're at fault for the accident...and damages. We don't get to go on the road and make up your own rules and policies. Follow the law or walk.
#36
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
People on foot are the most common offenders to The Law. Next would be motorists exceeding the posted speed limit and likely tied with motorists rolling stop signs. Why should I be the only road user who can't make up their own rules on the fly?
#37
☢
Ever get frustrated by a motorist that drives down the road with their turn signal on but never make a turn? Their actions are unpredictable, and therefore, dangerous.
#38
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
The most dangerous environment for cyclist (or any motorist for that matter) is when they are unpredictable. Laws give us the uniformity and commonality we need to keep us safe. Don't ignore them. That way there's little doubt about how we will behave, and what we're going to do.
On the contrary, I know for sure that THAT particular motorist knows his vehicle is equipped with turn signals and at least uses them occasionally. I am not assuming anything about his/her future behavior of course, but I would be happy to see any other road user signaling their intentions even if once in a while they forget their signal is activated. This will correct itself the very next time they try to signal.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,994
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
523 Posts
The most dangerous environment for cyclist (or any motorist for that matter) is when they are unpredictable. Laws give us the uniformity and commonality we need to keep us safe. Don't ignore them. That way there's little doubt about how we will behave, and what we're going to do.
Ever get frustrated by a motorist that drives down the road with their turn signal on but never make a turn? Their actions are unpredictable, and therefore, dangerous.
Ever get frustrated by a motorist that drives down the road with their turn signal on but never make a turn? Their actions are unpredictable, and therefore, dangerous.
#40
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
One of the confounding factors in developing the best strategies as bicyclists is that there is just about ZERO training and education motorists get relative to bicycle specific laws and how to negotiate them on the roads.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Until you get an FIA license, there is ZERO training about defending against passing vehicles, for ANY vehicle operator.
Notice here how I take FULL advantage of my lane position to "defend" against an illegally passing vehicle. Not.
-mr. bill
Notice here how I take FULL advantage of my lane position to "defend" against an illegally passing vehicle. Not.
-mr. bill
#43
C*pt*i* Obvious
Until you get an FIA license, there is ZERO training about defending against passing vehicles, for ANY vehicle operator.
Notice here how I take FULL advantage of my lane position to "defend" against an illegally passing vehicle. Not.
NO PASSING ZONE
-mr. bill
Notice here how I take FULL advantage of my lane position to "defend" against an illegally passing vehicle. Not.
NO PASSING ZONE
-mr. bill
I probably would have scooted to the right a bit if I saw someone coming up fast like that.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,994
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
523 Posts
If MIRRORS are good enough for multi-billion dollar NASA spacecraft they are good enough for me ... and you too. Cameras are for recording stuff. To see in real time mirrors are far less expensive and FAR more reliable. And already there. And, no, I would not "scoot to the right" if I were driving a car in a no passing zone. Why? Why would you do that? To make it easier for the cretin? Too late. If he smacks the oncoming traffic you won't be able to get away from being involved unless you can leave the road completely. This fails on all kinds of levels. The main one being: on a road like that the GREAT majority of your attention needs to be on the road AHEAD. That is where %@#%*! is likely to happen. Some awareness of what is happening all around your vehicle could never be a bad thing, but the only time you really NEED to look in your rear or side mirrors is when you plan to deviate from your current road position and impact traffic flow in a different lane from the one you presently occupy. If you presently drive with the nagging itch that someone could roll up on your rear bumper with enough delta vee to bring you both off the road in a fiery ball of car (and human) parts ... be at peace. Not going to happen. If you are stopped that is something else. But at road speed. Unlikiely. So focus on what is important.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
Some awareness of what is happening all around your vehicle could never be a bad thing, but the only time you really NEED to look in your rear or side mirrors is when you plan to deviate from your current road position and impact traffic flow in a different lane from the one you presently occupy.
Yeah, if I am proceeding forward, the vast majority of my attention should be in the forward maybe 90-100-degree ac---cars ahead in my lanes, cars oncoming, cars on side streets or on the side of the road which may pull out. But is always good to know what's around me, and it takes barely a second to glance in the rear-view .... ten seconds later, glance in the side view ... then the other ....
Not sure if I would have reacted if I saw a a car coming up really fast behind me (unless it had flashing blue lights (and for the sticklers who have no lives beyond pointing out niggling errors, any sighs that it was an emergency vehicle)) because I would have no idea if it would try to pass or slow down or whatever. I might just keep an eye on it ... and int he video, it looks like the car came up fast and blow right by. Th recording driver had little time and no need to respond or maneuver.
If I had been riding a bike, I would have heard the car coming, heard the rate of the change in engine noise volume and listened to how hard the engine was working, and realized this was a guy more intent on driving fast than safely. So--- Take the Lane and assert my right to be there, right?
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
I wholly agree, though. We keep making laws and rules and systems, but we never look to improving the quality of the people in the system, governed by the laws. It is actually a lot worse than a lot of people seem to think it is, IMO.
Change might take a few generations--or a global disaster. I am not willing to wait 100 years for it to be "safe" to ride. In about 20 minutes, I am going out into this evil world ---guess I will have take my chances.
#47
C*pt*i* Obvious
On the other hand, Good drivers check their mirrors quickly and frequently unless they are the only car on the road for miles, just because it makes sense and takes fractions of a second.
Yeah, if I am proceeding forward, the vast majority of my attention should be in the forward maybe 90-100-degree ac---cars ahead in my lanes, cars oncoming, cars on side streets or on the side of the road which may pull out. But is always good to know what's around me, and it takes barely a second to glance in the rear-view .... ten seconds later, glance in the side view ... then the other ....
Not sure if I would have reacted if I saw a a car coming up really fast behind me (unless it had flashing blue lights (and for the sticklers who have no lives beyond pointing out niggling errors, any sighs that it was an emergency vehicle)) because I would have no idea if it would try to pass or slow down or whatever. I might just keep an eye on it ... and int he video, it looks like the car came up fast and blow right by. Th recording driver had little time and no need to respond or maneuver.
If I had been riding a bike, I would have heard the car coming, heard the rate of the change in engine noise volume and listened to how hard the engine was working, and realized this was a guy more intent on driving fast than safely. So--- Take the Lane and assert my right to be there, right?
Yeah, if I am proceeding forward, the vast majority of my attention should be in the forward maybe 90-100-degree ac---cars ahead in my lanes, cars oncoming, cars on side streets or on the side of the road which may pull out. But is always good to know what's around me, and it takes barely a second to glance in the rear-view .... ten seconds later, glance in the side view ... then the other ....
Not sure if I would have reacted if I saw a a car coming up really fast behind me (unless it had flashing blue lights (and for the sticklers who have no lives beyond pointing out niggling errors, any sighs that it was an emergency vehicle)) because I would have no idea if it would try to pass or slow down or whatever. I might just keep an eye on it ... and int he video, it looks like the car came up fast and blow right by. Th recording driver had little time and no need to respond or maneuver.
If I had been riding a bike, I would have heard the car coming, heard the rate of the change in engine noise volume and listened to how hard the engine was working, and realized this was a guy more intent on driving fast than safely. So--- Take the Lane and assert my right to be there, right?
Mirrors were used to full effect, its clearly shown in the video.
Years ago, I was in a rental car and had someone roll up on me like that on a dark rural road, I thought I was going was going too slowly, (5 over the limit) and made the mistake of speeding up only to get the flashing lights of a state trooper.
That sucked, mostly because I usually know better.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,994
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
523 Posts
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Indiana
Posts: 592
Bikes: 1984 Fuji Club, Suntour ARX; 2013 Lynskey Peloton, mostly 105 with Ultegra rear derailleur, Enve 2.0 fork; 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c, full Deore with TRP dual piston mech disk brakes
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 324 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
71 Posts
They shouldn't be driving at all if they're blind, not alone passing...