Talking with police about traffic violation
#1
meh
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,705
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
Talking with police about traffic violation
Ugh ... I find it stressful to call the police to report a traffic violation. More often than not, I end up educating the officer about laws for riding a bike on the roads. Sometimes I have a receptive officer other times they are openly dismissive. I have no expectation of a citation for the driver, I do ask the PD to call the owner of the vehicle and inform them that a bike is a legal vehicle on the road and that 3 feet is the minimum required space while passing. Today's officer was receptive but I needed to have statutes in front of me, since he was unaware of them. .... just needed to vent it out a little.
Since this is BF ... I know this could get into a few rabbitholes, so I'll share additional information: Statute 169.18, Subdivision 3: (3) the operator of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle or individual proceeding in the same direction on the roadway shall leave a safe distance, but in no case less than three feet clearance, when passing the bicycle or individual and shall maintain clearance until safely past the overtaken bicycle or individual.
Bicyclists are considered traffic based on Minnesota Statute 169.011, Subdivision 84 and have the same rights and responsibilities applicable to the driver of a vehicle according to Minnesota Statute 169.222, Subdivision 1.
Minnesota Statute 169.011 states: "Traffic" means pedestrians, ridden or herded animals, vehicles, streetcars and other conveyances, either singly or together, while using any highway for purposes of travel.
Reference: https://www.bikemn.org/education/min...20a%20roadway.
GoPro video of the pass that got me to call the police:
Postscript: just talked to the officer again. He contacted the driver, who claimed I was weaving unpredictably. Sadly the officer had no interest in the video which clearly shows no weaving. The only good take away from this effort is two more people are aware that 3 feet are required when passing a person using a bike on the road.
Since this is BF ... I know this could get into a few rabbitholes, so I'll share additional information: Statute 169.18, Subdivision 3: (3) the operator of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle or individual proceeding in the same direction on the roadway shall leave a safe distance, but in no case less than three feet clearance, when passing the bicycle or individual and shall maintain clearance until safely past the overtaken bicycle or individual.
Bicyclists are considered traffic based on Minnesota Statute 169.011, Subdivision 84 and have the same rights and responsibilities applicable to the driver of a vehicle according to Minnesota Statute 169.222, Subdivision 1.
Minnesota Statute 169.011 states: "Traffic" means pedestrians, ridden or herded animals, vehicles, streetcars and other conveyances, either singly or together, while using any highway for purposes of travel.
Reference: https://www.bikemn.org/education/min...20a%20roadway.
GoPro video of the pass that got me to call the police:
Postscript: just talked to the officer again. He contacted the driver, who claimed I was weaving unpredictably. Sadly the officer had no interest in the video which clearly shows no weaving. The only good take away from this effort is two more people are aware that 3 feet are required when passing a person using a bike on the road.
Last edited by Hypno Toad; 08-25-20 at 09:20 AM. Reason: postscript
#2
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,958
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 990 Post(s)
Liked 884 Times
in
529 Posts
Definitely a close pass when it was clear that the driver could have moved over. My experience calling the police is that, although it may be a way for me to vent, it never results in satisfaction. 1) They decline to view the video, 2) they tell me that they cannot cite if they do not witness, and 3) I usually get a lecture about how cyclists don't follow the traffic rules.
Likes For Moe Zhoost:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 896
Bikes: 2017 Co-op ADV 1.1; ~1991 Novara Arriba; 1990 Fuji Palisade; mid-90's Moots Tandem; 1985 Performance Superbe
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 390 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
332 Posts
Less effective option
Thanks for making the effort to make the call. You are right; two more people informed.
This is not as effective, but reporting on www.closecalldatabase.com may have some value for repeat offenders.
This is not as effective, but reporting on www.closecalldatabase.com may have some value for repeat offenders.
Likes For flangehead:
#4
meh
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,705
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
Thanks for making the effort to make the call. You are right; two more people informed.
This is not as effective, but reporting on www.closecalldatabase.com may have some value for repeat offenders.
This is not as effective, but reporting on www.closecalldatabase.com may have some value for repeat offenders.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
I think the closecalldatabase is offline, unfortunately.
Cyliq has their site, but I don't know if they allow non-cycliq video to be uploaded.
The other good thing about making that call is that the driver now knows people are watching. As common as they are these days, lots of drivers still don't seem to realize they are being filmed quite regularly.
I run a front/rear motorcycle camera on my velo, but if drivers are being...troublesome....I will still pick my phone up and aim it at them just to make the point. It's funny how they react (usually drive off quickly) when that happens, even though 1) I've already got them on my video cameras, and 2) I'm not actually using my phone to record them.
Cyliq has their site, but I don't know if they allow non-cycliq video to be uploaded.
The other good thing about making that call is that the driver now knows people are watching. As common as they are these days, lots of drivers still don't seem to realize they are being filmed quite regularly.
I run a front/rear motorcycle camera on my velo, but if drivers are being...troublesome....I will still pick my phone up and aim it at them just to make the point. It's funny how they react (usually drive off quickly) when that happens, even though 1) I've already got them on my video cameras, and 2) I'm not actually using my phone to record them.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
OK, I usually hate to do this, but really.
A 13 wide curb lane at a the top of a T intersection is wide enough to share with a Honda Accord.
Don't lead with your chin and then complain about the boxing referee.
There ought to be THREE people learning from this, but sadly, I suspect ZERO have.
-mr. bill
A 13 wide curb lane at a the top of a T intersection is wide enough to share with a Honda Accord.
Don't lead with your chin and then complain about the boxing referee.
There ought to be THREE people learning from this, but sadly, I suspect ZERO have.
-mr. bill
#7
meh
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,705
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
I think the closecalldatabase is offline, unfortunately.
Cyliq has their site, but I don't know if they allow non-cycliq video to be uploaded.
The other good thing about making that call is that the driver now knows people are watching. As common as they are these days, lots of drivers still don't seem to realize they are being filmed quite regularly.
I run a front/rear motorcycle camera on my velo, but if drivers are being...troublesome....I will still pick my phone up and aim it at them just to make the point. It's funny how they react (usually drive off quickly) when that happens, even though 1) I've already got them on my video cameras, and 2) I'm not actually using my phone to record them.
Cyliq has their site, but I don't know if they allow non-cycliq video to be uploaded.
The other good thing about making that call is that the driver now knows people are watching. As common as they are these days, lots of drivers still don't seem to realize they are being filmed quite regularly.
I run a front/rear motorcycle camera on my velo, but if drivers are being...troublesome....I will still pick my phone up and aim it at them just to make the point. It's funny how they react (usually drive off quickly) when that happens, even though 1) I've already got them on my video cameras, and 2) I'm not actually using my phone to record them.
Likes For Hypno Toad:
#8
The dropped
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
Missing context
The typical problem with shared video. BTW, welcome to the inquisition.
Why were you stopped where you were in the roadway?
What had happened immediately before the clip starts? Is that the first time turning the camera on?
I understand the anger you felt as someone chose to risk your life rather than move their steering wheel another 8 degrees counter-clockwise; did you expect a different outcome?
It's unclear to me, did you catch the driver and both of you wait for police?
Why were you stopped where you were in the roadway?
What had happened immediately before the clip starts? Is that the first time turning the camera on?
I understand the anger you felt as someone chose to risk your life rather than move their steering wheel another 8 degrees counter-clockwise; did you expect a different outcome?
It's unclear to me, did you catch the driver and both of you wait for police?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,087
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3397 Post(s)
Liked 5,582 Times
in
2,896 Posts
I have shared video, and filed complaints with 3 different PDs here in CO, and all of them have taken it seriously and cited offending drivers. (Some while cycling, others while motorcycling.)
BTW I also learned that every time you share a video here on BF, there are always nimrods who want to blame the cyclist, no matter how blatant the offense committed by the cager.
BTW I also learned that every time you share a video here on BF, there are always nimrods who want to blame the cyclist, no matter how blatant the offense committed by the cager.
Likes For Shimagnolo:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
p.s. There is a whole subforum dedicated to all lanes are substandard.
p.p.s. I don't live in a FRAP state. (See sig.) OP does.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 08-25-20 at 12:33 PM.
#11
meh
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,705
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
I doubt the 'cager' learned anything, the officer learned a thing that I don't he'll ever put into practice or share again, not sure what the person on the bike needed to learn ... If I need to learn that police aren't great at advocating for people using bikes on the road ... I knew that. I also know that the road is full of people that feel entitled to use a car to intimate others. I could learn to take a different route, but I've been biking that road for ~40 years, so I'd say it not likely that I'd learn to change my route. I guess I learned I really like my GoPro, my Garmin radar, and my years of biking the roads to keep me safe around hateful people driving cars.
Funny enough, the officer made a point about asking if I was as far right as possible, I corrected him, it's "practical" not possible ... there's a difference. He really didn't like the lesson, and the length answer about not riding in the gutter since it's not safe and this road is not wide enough to pass within the lane and leave 3-ft between the bike and car.
I have enjoyed the rabbithole of lane position ...
Funny enough, the officer made a point about asking if I was as far right as possible, I corrected him, it's "practical" not possible ... there's a difference. He really didn't like the lesson, and the length answer about not riding in the gutter since it's not safe and this road is not wide enough to pass within the lane and leave 3-ft between the bike and car.
I have enjoyed the rabbithole of lane position ...
Likes For Hypno Toad:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,087
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3397 Post(s)
Liked 5,582 Times
in
2,896 Posts
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ho...!4d-93.4044187
Likes For Shimagnolo:
#13
The dropped
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times
in
696 Posts
He was stopped at the traffic light. There are no crosswalk markings on his side of the intersection:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ho...!4d-93.4044187
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ho...!4d-93.4044187
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
If I've learned anything at all from the other subform it is:
-mr. bill
- ALL LANES ARE SUBSTANDARD
- NO MATTER WHERE IN THE LANE YOU RIDE YOU RODE IN THE WRONG POSITION
-mr. bill
Likes For mr_bill:
#16
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,099 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#17
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,099 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Actually, it's "practicable", but I think the difference between practical and practicable is that saying practicable makes you sound drunk.
Likes For livedarklions:
Likes For mr_bill:
#19
meh
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,705
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
FWIW - we have 10 to 12 foot wide lanes. This road on the narrow side, but I don't have the exact measure.
#20
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,152
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6288 Post(s)
Liked 4,878 Times
in
3,361 Posts
There appears to be no reason the car should not have moved over to the other lane to pass. While some people might think you should have been elsewhere...... you weren't. You were where you had a legal right to be. Whether others think you shouldn't have been there, it makes no difference. The law says you can be there.
You were there, the car should not have been that close..
You were there, the car should not have been that close..
Likes For Iride01:
#21
meh
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,705
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
THIS ^^^^
Thanks!
Thanks!
Likes For Hypno Toad:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,680
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 776 Times
in
402 Posts
Ugh ... I find it stressful to call the police to report a traffic violation. More often than not, I end up educating the officer about laws for riding a bike on the roads. Sometimes I have a receptive officer other times they are openly dismissive. I have no expectation of a citation for the driver, I do ask the PD to call the owner of the vehicle and inform them that a bike is a legal vehicle on the road and that 3 feet is the minimum required space while passing. Today's officer was receptive but I needed to have statutes in front of me, since he was unaware of them. .... just needed to vent it out a little.
Since this is BF ... I know this could get into a few rabbitholes, so I'll share additional information: Statute 169.18, Subdivision 3: (3) the operator of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle or individual proceeding in the same direction on the roadway shall leave a safe distance, but in no case less than three feet clearance, when passing the bicycle or individual and shall maintain clearance until safely past the overtaken bicycle or individual.
Bicyclists are considered traffic based on Minnesota Statute 169.011, Subdivision 84 and have the same rights and responsibilities applicable to the driver of a vehicle according to Minnesota Statute 169.222, Subdivision 1.
Minnesota Statute 169.011 states: "Traffic" means pedestrians, ridden or herded animals, vehicles, streetcars and other conveyances, either singly or together, while using any highway for purposes of travel.
Reference: https://www.bikemn.org/education/min...20a%20roadway.
GoPro video of the pass that got me to call the police:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAKAc0HId6g
Postscript: just talked to the officer again. He contacted the driver, who claimed I was weaving unpredictably. Sadly the officer had no interest in the video which clearly shows no weaving. The only good take away from this effort is two more people are aware that 3 feet are required when passing a person using a bike on the road.
Since this is BF ... I know this could get into a few rabbitholes, so I'll share additional information: Statute 169.18, Subdivision 3: (3) the operator of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle or individual proceeding in the same direction on the roadway shall leave a safe distance, but in no case less than three feet clearance, when passing the bicycle or individual and shall maintain clearance until safely past the overtaken bicycle or individual.
Bicyclists are considered traffic based on Minnesota Statute 169.011, Subdivision 84 and have the same rights and responsibilities applicable to the driver of a vehicle according to Minnesota Statute 169.222, Subdivision 1.
Minnesota Statute 169.011 states: "Traffic" means pedestrians, ridden or herded animals, vehicles, streetcars and other conveyances, either singly or together, while using any highway for purposes of travel.
Reference: https://www.bikemn.org/education/min...20a%20roadway.
GoPro video of the pass that got me to call the police:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAKAc0HId6g
Postscript: just talked to the officer again. He contacted the driver, who claimed I was weaving unpredictably. Sadly the officer had no interest in the video which clearly shows no weaving. The only good take away from this effort is two more people are aware that 3 feet are required when passing a person using a bike on the road.
At that rate you might get 18% of your town informed by the year 3039
Likes For downhillmaster:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
There appears to be no reason the car should not have moved over to the other lane to pass. While some people might think you should have been elsewhere...... you weren't. You were where you had a legal right to be. Whether others think you shouldn't have been there, it makes no difference. The law says you can be there.
You were there, the car should not have been that close..
You were there, the car should not have been that close..
Likes For Notso_fastLane:
#24
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,152
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6288 Post(s)
Liked 4,878 Times
in
3,361 Posts
Cyclist need to learn the rules of the road too. It only takes a few that are oblivious of everything but themselves to P.O. motorist's towards all.
Likes For Iride01: