![]() |
Man attacks 2 cyclists
This happened local to me and it's kind of scary......
LINK.... https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articl...022903385.html Police said the chain of events that led to the stand-off was set into motion at 11 a.m., when there was a bizarre encounter between the driver of an SUV and two people riding bicycles on Headlands Road. "He ran into one of them, it appears to be an intentional act, and then he turned around and confronted the other bike rider and physically assaulted him," Mentor Police Chief Ken Gunsch told FOX 8. "He got out of the car and physically assaulted him and then he fled the scene." |
I'm surprised more cyclists don't carry something for self defense. Pepper gel works quite well. Once a motorist exits the protection of their metal cage they lose any advantage they might have had.
|
Originally Posted by JW Fas
(Post 23756081)
I'm surprised more cyclists don't carry something for self defense. Pepper gel works quite well. Once a motorist exits the protection of their metal cage they lose any advantage they might have had.
|
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 23756110)
No, they still have a big advantage. They’ve got access to all kinds of things that could be used as a weapon and, if you’re wearing cycling shoes, they are a lot more mobile than you are.
|
Originally Posted by JW Fas
(Post 23756121)
But you can't run away either. Whether on foot or via your bike. They can just get back in their vehicle and chase you. Hence why having something on you is better than nothing. Even if they're carrying something, they've given up their most effective weapon by leaving the vehicle.
|
Originally Posted by JW Fas
(Post 23756121)
But you can't run away either. Whether on foot or via your bike. They can just get back in their vehicle and chase you. Hence why having something on you is better than nothing. Even if they're carrying something, they've given up their most effective weapon by leaving the vehicle.
|
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
(Post 23756190)
Did you read the article and what the lawmen had to do in order to non-lethally subdue this deranged character who apparently felt no pain? What "effective" weapon do you suggest that bicyclists carry for such situations?
|
The hair due on that clown looks crazy. I carry halt and a 13oz can of bear spray. I have used either or on animals but never on people. For people who don't move on after being stupid I find the front wheel of my bicycle to be quite effective.
|
Originally Posted by Johnny Mullet
(Post 23756002)
This happened local to me and it's kind of scary......
LINK.... https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articl...022903385.html |
Originally Posted by JW Fas
(Post 23756121)
Even if they're carrying something, they've given up their most effective weapon by leaving the vehicle.
|
Originally Posted by JW Fas
(Post 23756081)
Once a motorist exits the protection of their metal cage they lose any advantage they might have had.
|
Originally Posted by JW Fas
(Post 23756081)
I'm surprised more cyclists don't carry something for self defense. Pepper gel works quite well.
|
Originally Posted by I Like To Ride
(Post 23756675)
Is it really that simple. ?Have you actually been in a real situation where you had to defend yourself with pepper spray against an attacker ?.
I recommend pepper gel because it's the best all-around defense tool when considering multiple factors. A gun will stop an attacker much more soundly, but it comes with obvious legal problems. Even if you justifiably use it, you still might have an expensive court battle to clear yourself of any charges. There is also nothing stopping the attacker (or their family in case of death) from suing you, and your homeowners insurance may not cover you for such a claim. Knives? They're horrible self defense weapons unless you have formal training. They can slip and cut you instead, and they're only good at close range. They also come with similar legal problems as guns. A kubotan would also work and doesn't carry the legal baggage, but like a knife it can only be used at close range. Pepper gel is easy to carry, easy to draw, works on most opponents, works at medium range, doesn't get blown by the wind like standard spray, and doesn't carry the legal problems of guns and knives.
Originally Posted by I Like To Ride
(Post 23756647)
Just because a motorist exits their vehicle doesn't mean that they are at a disadvantage. You have no idea what a motorist may be carrying inside their vehicle. It could be a steel pipe, a baseball bat, a tire iron, a cheater bar, a hammer, an axe, a machete, a knife etc. All of those are very effective weapons and even if you carry a pepper spray it would still be very hard to defend yourself against an armed attacker who is motivated and determined to hurt you.
|
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
(Post 23756190)
Did you read the article and what the lawmen had to do in order to non-lethally subdue this deranged character who apparently felt no pain? What "effective" weapon do you suggest that bicyclists carry for such situations?
I don't think management wants us talking about certain tools on this site, but some tools can be quite effective, especially if the person using them has extensive training and education in their use. |
Originally Posted by I Like To Ride
(Post 23756647)
Just because a motorist exits their vehicle doesn't mean that they are at a disadvantage.
|
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
(Post 23756929)
Yes it does. They are at a huge legal disadvantage if things go sideways.
Legal disadvantage can also apply to the person defending themselves against an attacker. It all depends how much force you use to repel an attacker or what type of object you use to defend yourself with. One poster here mentioned pepper gel or pepper spray. I can tell you that here in Ontario, Canada it is illegal to use pepper spray for self-defence against a human attacker. You can legally purchase pepper spray and use it against a bear attack or dog attack but you can't use it against a human attacker and if you do then you are putting yourself at a legal disadvantage. |
We all have a right to travel down the road unmolested. Be observant and be prepared.
|
Originally Posted by I Like To Ride
(Post 23757091)
Legal disadvantage can also apply to the person defending themselves against an attacker.
|
Originally Posted by I Like To Ride
(Post 23757091)
Legal disadvantage can also apply to the person defending themselves against an attacker. It all depends how much force you use to repel an attacker or what type of object you use to defend yourself with. One poster here mentioned pepper gel or pepper spray. I can tell you that here in Ontario, Canada it is illegal to use pepper spray for self-defence against a human attacker. You can legally purchase pepper spray and use it against a bear attack or dog attack but you can't use it against a human attacker and if you do then you are putting yourself at a legal disadvantage.
I didn't think to apply the laws of Zimbabwe to the US resident's comment about something that happened in the US. Rest assured, in the USA in an altercation between a motorist who exits the vehicle and a bicyclist, the motorist is going to have a hard time legally justifying why they left the vehicle. |
What does this incident have to do with cycling safety, really?
Are we going to start to post articles about house fires if we find out the homeowner had a bike? |
Originally Posted by Kontact
(Post 23757390)
What does this incident have to do with cycling safety, really?
Are we going to start to post articles about house fires if we find out the homeowner had a bike? As cyclists, it's not unusual for us to face physical/safety threats because we dare to be on motorist's roads. Should we assume that had the driver not encountered the cyclists, he would have done the same thing to the next motorist he encounters? To me, it seems obvious that because they were cyclists, they were assaulted. |
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
(Post 23757392)
As cyclists, it's not unusual for us to face physical/safety threats because we dare to be on motorist's roads. Should we assume that had the driver not encountered the cyclists, he would have done the same thing to the next motorist he encounters? To me, it seems obvious that because they were cyclists, they were assaulted.
This is one isolated incident, but you guys want to talk about it like its a major trend worthy of a universal response by cyclists. Meanwhile, there are groups that do face actual systemic attacks, and there is the general risk that everyone bears of random violence that is unrelated to lycra shorts. But neither of those categories are cycling related. If folks want to talk about self defense for those riding with minimal gear - great idea. Pepper spray/gel is good for dogs as well. Your bike can also be used as a barrier, like how riot cops use them. Frame pumps are useful, too. But this incident contains no general lessons about common driver behavior or common preparations cyclists should make because they are cycling. It seems more like the tendency on this board for cyclists to feel as if they are some special group of beleaguered citizens that are targets of massive levels of discrimination. It is weird. |
Originally Posted by Kontact
(Post 23757405)
So? Does anyone think there is a nationwide scourge of drivers getting out of their vehicles to assault cyclists?
This is one isolated incident, but you guys want to talk about it like its a major trend worthy of a universal response by cyclists. Meanwhile, there are groups that do face actual systemic attacks, and there is the general risk that everyone bears of random violence that is unrelated to lycra shorts. But neither of those categories are cycling related. If folks want to talk about self defense for those riding with minimal gear - great idea. Pepper spray/gel is good for dogs as well. Your bike can also be used as a barrier, like how riot cops use them. Frame pumps are useful, too. But this incident contains no general lessons about common driver behavior or common preparations cyclists should make because they are cycling. It seems more like the tendency on this board for cyclists to feel as if they are some special group of beleaguered citizens that are targets of massive levels of discrimination. It is weird. |
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
(Post 23757568)
He also weaponized his vehicle. Sadly, it happens from time to time. Seems like there was another incident just last month in GA. As I am sure you are aware, it's not the ordinary that typically makes for interesting discussion. I could tell a story about how a motorist pulled a left turn in front of me Monday, and it probably wouldn't interest many people even though it's a common problem. FWIW there are a lot of shockingly unhealthy attitudes toward cyclists, and I can't help but believe those attitudes fuel behaviors such as the subject of this thread. The lesson here. There are mean people out there. There are criminals. Cyclists do get intentionally targeted because they are cyclists. There's not much you can do to defend yourself against someone weaponizing a car. There is something you can do about someone who gets out. Riders should have a mental plan and perhaps tools. A rider shouldn't wait until the moment it happens to develop a plan. Simply riding away may be the best defense/safety measure if it's an available option. It may be the option I choose based on the whole of the circumstances. It won't be my only option.
|
Originally Posted by JW Fas
(Post 23756081)
I'm surprised more cyclists don't carry something for self defense. Pepper gel works quite well. Once a motorist exits the protection of their metal cage they lose any advantage they might have had.
I am about to order a new POM pepper spray. I've heard they lose their potency after about 2 years.
Originally Posted by I Like To Ride
(Post 23756675)
Is it really that simple. ?Have you actually been in a real situation where you had to defend yourself with pepper spray against an attacker ?.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.