Is there anything wrong with this?
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is there anything wrong with this?
One of the roadways I have to use while commuting home is called Singing Hills Blvd. 4 lanes in a very bussy commercial area of town, 35 mph, traffic usually travels above that. There is a multi-use rec. path running parellal with Singing Hills. It crosses & intersects with the entrances to the commercial businesses. Which include Wal-Mart, a hotel, numerous reseraunts, a truck stop, etc.
There is an unenforced city ordinance that states if there is a rec. path parellal with a roadway cyclists are to use the path.
From experience I have this to be more dangerous then riding on the roadway. So I always ride on the street. Traffic is not expecting a cyclist to be on the path when they turn to enter the commercial businesses.
In your opinion, & aside from violating this unenforced law is there anything wrong with doing this?
I am asking for opinions here, feel free to state what ever you wish on this matter.
There is an unenforced city ordinance that states if there is a rec. path parellal with a roadway cyclists are to use the path.
From experience I have this to be more dangerous then riding on the roadway. So I always ride on the street. Traffic is not expecting a cyclist to be on the path when they turn to enter the commercial businesses.
In your opinion, & aside from violating this unenforced law is there anything wrong with doing this?
I am asking for opinions here, feel free to state what ever you wish on this matter.
#2
Senior Member
No. I'd do the same as you, and frequently have. Bike paths only work if there are few, if any, intersections with cars crossing them.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 991
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse 5c, Scattante XRL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Bike paths only work if there are few, if any, intersections with cars crossing them.
#4
Skin-Pounder
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clarkston (Atlanta, GA., USA)
Posts: 502
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I prefer riding in the street, however knowing the law and willfully ignoring it has potential drawbacks.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, as I just posted on another thread, MUP and street intersections drive me crazy. So I'd by pass the area if I could. I'm not really an anti Walmart person, but words "Wal-Mart, a hotel, numerous reseraunts, a truck stop" scare the crap out of me. If the MUP crosses the entrances to each of them, perhaps you should hedge your bets and consider enrolling in all religions equally. Just one won't cut it.
I recall seeing a mpeg clip of a guy mountain bike riding who comes to a tricky part of the trail and starts to walk his bike. When asked by fellow riders, he says "Look at the penalty for failure" or something like that. The next scene shows him trying to ride it and then falling down the side of the mountain for about 30 seconds. He saved his bike though, gear side up. Seems his first impression/instict to walk the bike was correct. I say go with your first impression/instinct.
I recall seeing a mpeg clip of a guy mountain bike riding who comes to a tricky part of the trail and starts to walk his bike. When asked by fellow riders, he says "Look at the penalty for failure" or something like that. The next scene shows him trying to ride it and then falling down the side of the mountain for about 30 seconds. He saved his bike though, gear side up. Seems his first impression/instict to walk the bike was correct. I say go with your first impression/instinct.
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Bike paths only work if there are few, if any, intersections with cars crossing them.
Do you also believe that bike lanes only work if there are few, if any, intersections with cars crossing them? If not, what's the difference? Why do bike paths with more than a few, if any, intersections not work, but bike lanes with more than a few, if any, intersections do "work"?
#7
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Someone here is persistent.
Al
Al
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696
Bikes: who cares?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by N_C
I am asking for opinions here, feel free to state what ever you wish on this matter.
#9
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by N_C
There is an unenforced city ordinance that states if there is a rec. path parellal with a roadway cyclists are to use the path.
Al
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 162
Bikes: 2006 Marin San Anselmo, 2008 Specialized Roubaix Pro (custom), 2007 Salsa Casseroll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use a MUP that parallels a major 4-lane street with segmented turn lanes. It crosses about 3-4 shopping center entrances and 1-2 major streets during the small stretch I ride it. Unfortunately it is the best option, as the 4-lane street has a 45MPH limit (most do 50-55MPH) and is the busiest road and crosses some of the busiest intersections in town. I don't feel near confident enough in my cycling to get out on that road. Unfortunately there are no parallel neighborhood streets on this stretch. It's all shopping until crossing over the railroad tracks on a bridge. My best advice for stretches like this is to bike slowly, and constantly watch. I slow down at each intersection with driveways to be sure I am seen and know what is going on in all directions. Also, right-turning vehicles at the major stop-lighted intersections will not respect your right to cross. Ever. The light will change. The walk sign will come on. And regardless of if I try to cross or stay at the edge on my bike, the entire line of right-turning cars will force their way through rather than wait the 3 seconds it would take me to clear there lanes of traffic, even *walking*.
#11
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Brad Smith
I use a MUP that parallels a major 4-lane street with segmented turn lanes. It crosses about 3-4 shopping center entrances and 1-2 major streets during the small stretch I ride it. Unfortunately it is the best option, as the 4-lane street has a 45MPH limit (most do 50-55MPH) and is the busiest road and crosses some of the busiest intersections in town. I don't feel near confident enough in my cycling to get out on that road. Unfortunately there are no parallel neighborhood streets on this stretch. It's all shopping until crossing over the railroad tracks on a bridge. My best advice for stretches like this is to bike slowly, and constantly watch. I slow down at each intersection with driveways to be sure I am seen and know what is going on in all directions. Also, right-turning vehicles at the major stop-lighted intersections will not respect your right to cross. Ever. The light will change. The walk sign will come on. And regardless of if I try to cross or stay at the edge on my bike, the entire line of right-turning cars will force their way through rather than wait the 3 seconds it would take me to clear there lanes of traffic, even *walking*.
#12
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride on a few bike paths like that, where they cross streets and intersections in problematic ways. But they are hugely popular paths with cyclists and despite the fact that the paths have stop signs for the bikes, drivers always stop for you anyway because they know to look out for cyclists in these areas. And most of the time they wave you through with a smile.
At the same time, however, there isn't a law mandating their use. I mostly use the paths, but sometimes I use the road instead.
If there was a law mandating their use, and they truly were unnavigable, then I would not obey the law. My life is worth more than a ticket.
At the same time, however, there isn't a law mandating their use. I mostly use the paths, but sometimes I use the road instead.
If there was a law mandating their use, and they truly were unnavigable, then I would not obey the law. My life is worth more than a ticket.
#13
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Agreed.
Do you also believe that bike lanes only work if there are few, if any, intersections with cars crossing them? If not, what's the difference? Why do bike paths with more than a few, if any, intersections not work, but bike lanes with more than a few, if any, intersections do "work"?
Do you also believe that bike lanes only work if there are few, if any, intersections with cars crossing them? If not, what's the difference? Why do bike paths with more than a few, if any, intersections not work, but bike lanes with more than a few, if any, intersections do "work"?
FWIW, nothing really works "well" if you assume lots of intersections and an unskilled rider riding off to the very far right.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#14
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
You get the rest of the road. Bike lanes are only restrictive if you ride them as if they restrict you (do you?).
They also have the advantage of being part of the roadway where motorists can see and yield to you.
FWIW, nothing really works "well" if you assume lots of intersections and an unskilled rider riding off to the very far right.
FWIW, nothing really works "well" if you assume lots of intersections and an unskilled rider riding off to the very far right.
Do you agree with all of the following?
- position affects conspicuity
- conspicuity is particularly bad when the cyclist is positioned on a sidepath
- conspicutity is better but still relatively compromised when he's positioned in an on-the-edge bike lane,
- and conspicuity (as affected by positioning) is best when the cyclist is positioned "centerish" between left and right tire tracks of a vehicular traffic lane.
#15
Senior Member
HH, in my experience, the "conspicuity curve" flattens out after you get to the left edge of the bike lane. From there to the center of the lane, there difference in "conspicuity" is neglegible. In other words, I agree with your a-d, but the curve is non-linear and there is practically no difference between riding towards the left side of the bike lane and in the center of the lane. The curve drops off rapidly as you move further right, and is extremely bad for a separated side path, where the curve drops with a discontinuity.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#16
Huachuca Rider
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,275
Bikes: Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
I don't, but 99% of the cyclists that I see do. And like Mr. Beck likes to point out, accomodations affect cyclists even on streets without accomodations. So even on streets without bike lanes, "bike lane lubbers" (for lack of a better term) ride on the edge where the bike lane would be if there was one there, even when same direction traffic is absent.
Okay.
Do you agree with all of the following?
Okay.
Do you agree with all of the following?
- position affects conspicuity
- conspicuity is particularly bad when the cyclist is positioned on a sidepath
- conspicutity is better but still relatively compromised when he's positioned in an on-the-edge bike lane,
- and conspicuity (as affected by positioning) is best when the cyclist is positioned "centerish" between left and right tire tracks of a vehicular traffic lane.
One's conspicuity is indeed at it's best when riding right down the center of the lane, if the driver expects the cyclist to be there. One's conspicuity is only slightly reduced however when a fast-moving vehicle splatters one's bike and body all over the lane.
I see a lot of comment regarding inadvertent drift as a cause of cyclists being hit in bike lanes. Thus far, though skid marks say cars do occasionally enter the bike lane, I have been the beneficiary of thousands and thousands of inadvertent misses by vehicles not in the bike lanes.
__________________
Just Peddlin' Around
Just Peddlin' Around
#17
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Half of my commute is on a narrow, winding, two-lane 35mph parkway with no shoulders, that has a MUP running parallel to it. I ride the road. We don't have any laws against doing so, but a lot of motorists just don't get it and think you should be on the path. I ride the right tire track, maybe center, since the outside of the lane and be pretty poor in places, only yielding right when it's safe to do so. Really pisses motorists off when there is a lot of oncoming traffic, because I don't give them any room to try to squeeze past around the numerous blind curves...tough cookies, bikes have been ridden on this road since before the MUP ever existed, anyone who grew up or lived here for any number of years should know that and not choose this route if they are in a freaking hurry, they got plenty of freeways and 4 lane arterials to choose from if they feel the need for speed. Pains me every day to see the amount of road kill on our roads...people just don't give a crap about slowing down, paying attention or driving courtesly (animals are people too ya know!)
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#18
Senior Member
Conspicuity curve follows as an attachment. I should add that I am mostly convinced that crossing collisions where nobody's view is physically obscured is due more to speed misjudgement than not seeing the cyclist. Right hooks especially.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#19
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Conspicuity curve follows as an attachment. I should add that I am mostly convinced that crossing collisions where nobody's view is physically obscured is due more to speed misjudgement than not seeing the cyclist. Right hooks especially.
Al
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696
Bikes: who cares?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by noisebeam
This points out what I don't like about the BL stripe. I often find the ideal place to ride a roadway is where the stripe is placed, but as soon as it is there, it becomes a 'no ride' zone to avoid riding in an ambigous lane position. Many drivers follow their rule of as long as I am not in the BL I can ignore passing cyclist, which leads to getting lots of close passes when riding left biased in a BL.
Al
Al
#21
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Overall I find I can both control and get greater passing clearance in a WOL by riding further left and can only get greater passing clearance when riding in a BL by riding futher right.
Al
Al
#22
Senior Member
Originally Posted by noisebeam
This points out what I don't like about the BL stripe. I often find the ideal place to ride a roadway is where the stripe is placed, but as soon as it is there, it becomes a 'no ride' zone to avoid riding in an ambigous lane position. Many drivers follow their rule of as long as I am not in the BL I can ignore passing cyclist, which leads to getting lots of close passes when riding left biased in a BL.
Al
Al
I've also found that with the clarity of road positioning given by a bike lane, that passes considered "close" in a shared lane sense are tolerable because of the guidance provided by the bike lane stripe for both me and the overtaking vehicle . Cars, at least in my locale, treat the left edge of the bike lane as a lane line and don't arbitrarily cross into it. It helps that, in Oregon, it is explicitly illegal to drive in the bike lane. Moreover, in a bike lane design, it is expected that cars and bicycles continue unimpeded. One may argue that this is bad, but my experience begs to differ. It make traffic flow more smoothly, and it makes traffic more predictable.
One of the practical advantages: I can gain space by a lateral move of a couple inches. I can move a mere two or three inches to the left of the bike lane and sufficiently signal intent to claim the lane. I can move back into the bike lane and signal that it is okay to pass. These maneuvers would take a very large change in lateral positioning if there were no reference line, such as the case of a WOL. It allows a lane change (or lane claim) to happen in a discrete manner. There is no confusing the intent of a cyclist who is outside of the bike lane, even if it is by only a couple of inches.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#23
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
I can move a mere two or three inches to the left of the bike lane and sufficiently signal intent to claim the lane. I can move back into the bike lane and signal that it is okay to pass. These maneuvers would take a very large change in lateral positioning if there were no reference line, such as the case of a WOL. It allows a lane change (or lane claim) to happen in a discrete manner. There is no confusing the intent of a cyclist who is outside of the bike lane, even if it is by only a couple of inches.
Al
#24
Senior Member
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Overall I find I can both control and get greater passing clearance in a WOL by riding further left and can only get greater passing clearance when riding in a BL by riding futher right.
Al
Al
Another thing which may account for this is that WOLs are generally narrower than a NOL+BL width, because traffic engineers want to avoid a double line of cars in the lane. When you ride 3 feet from the curb in a WOL, you are essentially outside the bike lane, or at least on the line on an equivilent bike laned street.
I firmly believe that a NOL+BL is not simply a WOL+stripe. Your experience confirms that. A bike lane is truly a lane of traffic and needs to be ridden as such. The only reason to stay on the left side of the bike lane is purely practical and is to avoid blending into the visual clutter at the side of the road. Our outline is broken up, so it makes visibility more of a concern when compared to cars which are one big monolith, easily picked out from amongst the visual clutter.
A simple way which might eliminate this concern about visual clutter is to place a shoulder to the right of the bike lane. Then the entire lane becomes accessible to cyclists. The current state of the art designs, I feel, are adequate, but placing a designated shoulder to the right of the bike lane (this would mean bike lanes are designated by two stripes, one to the left and one to the right) would be even better.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 760
Bikes: Road, Mtn, Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
A bike lane is truly a lane of traffic ...
"any preferential lane designated ...". In contrast, the BL definition begins:
"a portion of a roadway which has been designated ..."
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
... place a shoulder to the right of the bike lane.
A portion of a roadway or shoulder* which has been designated for use by bicyclists …
* shoulder— the roadway portion for accommodation of stopped vehicles for emergency use, and for lateral support of the base and surface courses.