Roads closed to bicycles
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 399
Bikes: Specialized (2) Trek 400, Raleigh 3spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Roads closed to bicycles
I know there was a thread a couple of months ago about a town in Texas closing one of its streets to cycling....and if I remember correctly, it was challenged. I can't seem to find the thread with the search function.
Does anyone know the outcome?
My town just passed a new ordinance that allows the police department to close any streets it deems necessary to bicycles. This is an issue that came up quietly and without discussion. Something the new chief wanted "clarified". I suspect that the chief has a reason for wanting the clarification and the ordinance.
I'm just trying to figure out if I have any rights if I'm banned from any particular streets in my town, which is a very small town and has no speed limit above 35mph. Included with this ordinance is one that requires a bicycle to use a bike path when one is present...an interesting ordinance since there are no bike paths in my town or surrounding country side.
I've also added myself to the town's email list just to keep an eye on future happenings.
Does anyone know the outcome?
My town just passed a new ordinance that allows the police department to close any streets it deems necessary to bicycles. This is an issue that came up quietly and without discussion. Something the new chief wanted "clarified". I suspect that the chief has a reason for wanting the clarification and the ordinance.
I'm just trying to figure out if I have any rights if I'm banned from any particular streets in my town, which is a very small town and has no speed limit above 35mph. Included with this ordinance is one that requires a bicycle to use a bike path when one is present...an interesting ordinance since there are no bike paths in my town or surrounding country side.
I've also added myself to the town's email list just to keep an eye on future happenings.
#2
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times
in
837 Posts
Check your state laws, which may or may not preclude local idiocy. California cyclists recently won a major victory against the city of Dana Point, which wanted to ban bicycles from a stretch of Coast Highway 101, but your state may differ ...
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#3
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
Originally Posted by jwc
I know there was a thread a couple of months ago about a town in Texas closing one of its streets to cycling....and if I remember correctly, it was challenged. I can't seem to find the thread with the search function.
Does anyone know the outcome?
My town just passed a new ordinance that allows the police department to close any streets it deems necessary to bicycles. This is an issue that came up quietly and without discussion. Something the new chief wanted "clarified". I suspect that the chief has a reason for wanting the clarification and the ordinance.
I'm just trying to figure out if I have any rights if I'm banned from any particular streets in my town, which is a very small town and has no speed limit above 35mph. Included with this ordinance is one that requires a bicycle to use a bike path when one is present...an interesting ordinance since there are no bike paths in my town or surrounding country side.
I've also added myself to the town's email list just to keep an eye on future happenings.
Does anyone know the outcome?
My town just passed a new ordinance that allows the police department to close any streets it deems necessary to bicycles. This is an issue that came up quietly and without discussion. Something the new chief wanted "clarified". I suspect that the chief has a reason for wanting the clarification and the ordinance.
I'm just trying to figure out if I have any rights if I'm banned from any particular streets in my town, which is a very small town and has no speed limit above 35mph. Included with this ordinance is one that requires a bicycle to use a bike path when one is present...an interesting ordinance since there are no bike paths in my town or surrounding country side.
I've also added myself to the town's email list just to keep an eye on future happenings.
If you don't mind asking which small town? (a PM would be fine) NC has a fairly comprehensive set of bicycle laws in place, but there are plenty of local ordinances that attempt to countermand those laws, and my understanding is that ordinances can only be used on private roads. I have also been told by local law enforcement that I wasn't "allowed" to ride on roads with 45 mph, etc, etc.
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 399
Bikes: Specialized (2) Trek 400, Raleigh 3spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It is a little town named Ayden...home of the Collard Festival...lol.
My thoughts were that the town couldn't contradict state law, but towns have the authority to ban trucks from certain streets, so why not bicycles?
Amazingly, to me at least, is that the town's bike laws forbid riding on sidewalks and reflect the NC's laws that a bicycle has the rights and responsibilities of any motor vehicle. In my mind, the ordinance is a contradiction of its own proclamation.
My thoughts were that the town couldn't contradict state law, but towns have the authority to ban trucks from certain streets, so why not bicycles?
Amazingly, to me at least, is that the town's bike laws forbid riding on sidewalks and reflect the NC's laws that a bicycle has the rights and responsibilities of any motor vehicle. In my mind, the ordinance is a contradiction of its own proclamation.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 399
Bikes: Specialized (2) Trek 400, Raleigh 3spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is the ordinance just passed:
The Chief of Police is authorized to erect signs on any roadway prohibiting the riding of bicycles thereon by any person, and when such signs are in place no person shall disobey the same.
Line "C" was included as well.
73.08 RIDING ON ROADWAYS AND BICYCLE PATHS.
(A) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right-hand side of the roadway as practicable, exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the same direction.
(B) Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway shall not ride more than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(C) Whenever a usable designated path for bicycles has been provided adjacent to a roadway, bicycle riders shall use such path and shall not use the roadway.
The Chief of Police is authorized to erect signs on any roadway prohibiting the riding of bicycles thereon by any person, and when such signs are in place no person shall disobey the same.
Line "C" was included as well.
73.08 RIDING ON ROADWAYS AND BICYCLE PATHS.
(A) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right-hand side of the roadway as practicable, exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the same direction.
(B) Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway shall not ride more than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(C) Whenever a usable designated path for bicycles has been provided adjacent to a roadway, bicycle riders shall use such path and shall not use the roadway.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 160A-300. Traffic Control. A city may by ordinance prohibit, regulate, divert, control, and limit pedestrian or vehicular traffic upon the public streets. sidewalks, alleys, and bridges of the city.
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 20-169. Powers of local authorities. Local authorities, except as expressly authorized by G.S. 20-141 and 20-158, shall have no power or authority to ... enact or enforce any rules or regulations contrary to the provisions of this Article...
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 20-169. Powers of local authorities. Local authorities, except as expressly authorized by G.S. 20-141 and 20-158, shall have no power or authority to ... enact or enforce any rules or regulations contrary to the provisions of this Article...
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 399
Bikes: Specialized (2) Trek 400, Raleigh 3spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Order
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 160A-300. Traffic Control. A city may by ordinance prohibit, regulate, divert, control, and limit pedestrian or vehicular traffic upon the public streets. sidewalks, alleys, and bridges of the city.
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 20-169. Powers of local authorities. Local authorities, except as expressly authorized by G.S. 20-141 and 20-158, shall have no power or authority to ... enact or enforce any rules or regulations contrary to the provisions of this Article...
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 20-169. Powers of local authorities. Local authorities, except as expressly authorized by G.S. 20-141 and 20-158, shall have no power or authority to ... enact or enforce any rules or regulations contrary to the provisions of this Article...
#9
You need a new bike
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
The town in Texas is Anna. There was a city council meeting some months back to discuss the ordinance, and the result was no change and the ordinance stands.
There is apparent interest in challenging the ordinance in court, but the last I knew, the police have not cited anyone for violating the ordinance so nobody has standing to pursue a challenge.
There is apparent interest in challenging the ordinance in court, but the last I knew, the police have not cited anyone for violating the ordinance so nobody has standing to pursue a challenge.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in the hills of Orange, CA
Posts: 1,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Order
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 160A-300. Traffic Control. A city may by ordinance prohibit, regulate, divert, control, and limit pedestrian or vehicular traffic upon the public streets. sidewalks, alleys, and bridges of the city.
#11
Slow ride, take it easy -
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corn, corn, corn, corn, corn, corn, soybean, corn fields of Illinois
Posts: 252
Bikes: 98 Mongoose Cambridge with Xtracycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We have one street in our town that has bicycles banned from it. It is very narrow and dangerous to ride on because there is heavy vehicular traffic on it. The city put bike lanes on two adjacent one-way streets running in opposite directions to accomodate bikes.
Before they banned bikes on the section of roadway, we had a lot of students who would ride their bikes on the dangerous stretch of road, resulting in frustrated drivers who could not get around the cyclists on steep hills as well as frequent bicycle/car accidents.
I presume other cities cite safety issues or automotive traffic impediment issues when banning bicycles from certains stretches of roadway.
Before they banned bikes on the section of roadway, we had a lot of students who would ride their bikes on the dangerous stretch of road, resulting in frustrated drivers who could not get around the cyclists on steep hills as well as frequent bicycle/car accidents.
I presume other cities cite safety issues or automotive traffic impediment issues when banning bicycles from certains stretches of roadway.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 399
Bikes: Specialized (2) Trek 400, Raleigh 3spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I dont' know what brought this change about. My dealership services PD cars, but no one has brought one in since the ordinance was finalized. We hadn't had a bike/car accident since 1999 and that was my next door neighbor hitting a wrong-way bicyclist with his right side mirror. Only minor injuries resulted and this was before the new chief came about.
The chief is from the Triangle area and I'm wondering if this is something that was commonly used in that area.
If this chief wanted to enforce cycling laws, he could have started with the most common violators in my town. I almost clipped a kid last night...no light, wrong-way on the street, no reflectors. I see this almost every evening on my commute home. Everyday, I see wrong-way cyclists and side walk riders. If he is concerned about the safety of bicycling, there are plenty of opportunities for him to start his campaign. I'm just baffled by these two changes in the ordinance.
The chief is from the Triangle area and I'm wondering if this is something that was commonly used in that area.
If this chief wanted to enforce cycling laws, he could have started with the most common violators in my town. I almost clipped a kid last night...no light, wrong-way on the street, no reflectors. I see this almost every evening on my commute home. Everyday, I see wrong-way cyclists and side walk riders. If he is concerned about the safety of bicycling, there are plenty of opportunities for him to start his campaign. I'm just baffled by these two changes in the ordinance.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 389
Bikes: Trek 7.5 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jwc
I don't know what brought this change about.
...
Everyday, I see wrong-way cyclists and side walk riders. If he is concerned about the safety of bicycling, there are plenty of opportunities for him to start his campaign.
...
Everyday, I see wrong-way cyclists and side walk riders. If he is concerned about the safety of bicycling, there are plenty of opportunities for him to start his campaign.
Unfortunately, you're being lumped in with those who aren't riding responsibly.
#14
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Frankenbiker
We have one street in our town that has bicycles banned from it. It is very narrow and dangerous to ride on because there is heavy vehicular traffic on it. The city put bike lanes on two adjacent one-way streets running in opposite directions to accomodate bikes.
Before they banned bikes on the section of roadway, we had a lot of students who would ride their bikes on the dangerous stretch of road, resulting in frustrated drivers who could not get around the cyclists on steep hills as well as frequent bicycle/car accidents.
I presume other cities cite safety issues or automotive traffic impediment issues when banning bicycles from certains stretches of roadway.
Before they banned bikes on the section of roadway, we had a lot of students who would ride their bikes on the dangerous stretch of road, resulting in frustrated drivers who could not get around the cyclists on steep hills as well as frequent bicycle/car accidents.
I presume other cities cite safety issues or automotive traffic impediment issues when banning bicycles from certains stretches of roadway.
#15
52-week commuter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,929
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Frankenbiker
We have one street in our town that has bicycles banned from it. It is very narrow and dangerous to ride on because there is heavy vehicular traffic on it. The city put bike lanes on two adjacent one-way streets running in opposite directions to accomodate bikes.
Before they banned bikes on the section of roadway, we had a lot of students who would ride their bikes on the dangerous stretch of road, resulting in frustrated drivers who could not get around the cyclists on steep hills as well as frequent bicycle/car accidents.
I presume other cities cite safety issues or automotive traffic impediment issues when banning bicycles from certains stretches of roadway.
Before they banned bikes on the section of roadway, we had a lot of students who would ride their bikes on the dangerous stretch of road, resulting in frustrated drivers who could not get around the cyclists on steep hills as well as frequent bicycle/car accidents.
I presume other cities cite safety issues or automotive traffic impediment issues when banning bicycles from certains stretches of roadway.
JWC --
I notice that 160A-300 says "a city." Many states distinguish between cities and towns in their laws. You may want to find out if NC does. This section may not apply to your town.
__________________
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
#16
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Blue Order
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 160A-300. Traffic Control. A city may by ordinance prohibit, regulate, divert, control, and limit pedestrian or vehicular traffic upon the public streets. sidewalks, alleys, and bridges of the city.
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 20-169. Powers of local authorities. Local authorities, except as expressly authorized by G.S. 20-141 and 20-158, shall have no power or authority to ... enact or enforce any rules or regulations contrary to the provisions of this Article...
North Carolina General Statutes Sec. 20-169. Powers of local authorities. Local authorities, except as expressly authorized by G.S. 20-141 and 20-158, shall have no power or authority to ... enact or enforce any rules or regulations contrary to the provisions of this Article...
Not good. There is specific statutory authority allowing them to limit bicyclists. I would look into whether there was an ordinance that was properly passed, did they jump through all the hoops, meeting, notice, quorum etc, and also look into whether the street is a state road, and therefore outside of the jurisdiction of the city.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#17
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
Do you agree with this ban? Did anyone try to fight it or was everyone happy with the bike lanes on the adjacent roadway?
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#18
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
Originally Posted by jwc
This is the ordinance just passed:
The Chief of Police is authorized to erect signs on any roadway prohibiting the riding of bicycles thereon by any person, and when such signs are in place no person shall disobey the same.
Line "C" was included as well.
73.08 RIDING ON ROADWAYS AND BICYCLE PATHS.
(A) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right-hand side of the roadway as practicable, exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the same direction.
(B) Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway shall not ride more than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(C) Whenever a usable designated path for bicycles has been provided adjacent to a roadway, bicycle riders shall use such path and shall not use the roadway.
The Chief of Police is authorized to erect signs on any roadway prohibiting the riding of bicycles thereon by any person, and when such signs are in place no person shall disobey the same.
Line "C" was included as well.
73.08 RIDING ON ROADWAYS AND BICYCLE PATHS.
(A) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right-hand side of the roadway as practicable, exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the same direction.
(B) Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway shall not ride more than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(C) Whenever a usable designated path for bicycles has been provided adjacent to a roadway, bicycle riders shall use such path and shall not use the roadway.
Aaron
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#19
Slow ride, take it easy -
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corn, corn, corn, corn, corn, corn, soybean, corn fields of Illinois
Posts: 252
Bikes: 98 Mongoose Cambridge with Xtracycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Re: agreeing with our local bicycle ban on one street.
Yes, I agree with the bicycle ban on our street. I lived on that street from 1970 through 1993. It is very narrow and in portions there is a steep embankment on one side with a decaying "sidewalk" six feet above grade and no sidewalk on the other side, Telephone poles are within one foot of the curb (I unintentionally hit one with my hand once years ago when my arm was hanging out the window as a passenger in a car. Dang that hurt.)
The street is the most heavily traveled N-S street through town and is a direct route from campus to uptown bars. Semis and drunken drivers were common. Back when 18yr-olds could get into bars, college students would ride to the bars on bikes (and back) and get into all sorts of trouble.
There was an ancient bridge at the bottom of a ravine that was just barely wide enough for two cars to pass. Very dangerous. Last year they finally bulldozed a few houses adjacent to the old bridge, tore it out and put in a wider version.
Everybody was happy with the ban. I would be very uncomfortable riding on that street even without the bicycle ban. The bicycle lanes on the adjacent one-way streets are very useful for getting from campus uptown to the "Square."
Yes, I agree with the bicycle ban on our street. I lived on that street from 1970 through 1993. It is very narrow and in portions there is a steep embankment on one side with a decaying "sidewalk" six feet above grade and no sidewalk on the other side, Telephone poles are within one foot of the curb (I unintentionally hit one with my hand once years ago when my arm was hanging out the window as a passenger in a car. Dang that hurt.)
The street is the most heavily traveled N-S street through town and is a direct route from campus to uptown bars. Semis and drunken drivers were common. Back when 18yr-olds could get into bars, college students would ride to the bars on bikes (and back) and get into all sorts of trouble.
There was an ancient bridge at the bottom of a ravine that was just barely wide enough for two cars to pass. Very dangerous. Last year they finally bulldozed a few houses adjacent to the old bridge, tore it out and put in a wider version.
Everybody was happy with the ban. I would be very uncomfortable riding on that street even without the bicycle ban. The bicycle lanes on the adjacent one-way streets are very useful for getting from campus uptown to the "Square."
Last edited by Frankenbiker; 12-15-06 at 06:21 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Frankenbiker
Re: agreeing with our local bicycle ban on one street.
Yes, I agree with the bicycle ban on our street. I lived on that street from 1970 through 1993. It is very narrow and in portions there is a steep embankment on one side with a decaying "sidewalk" six feet above grade and no sidewalk on the other side, Telephone poles are within one foot of the curb (I unintentionally hit one with my hand once years ago when my arm was hanging out the window as a passenger in a car. Dang that hurt.)
The street is the most heavily traveled N-S street through town and is a direct route from campus to uptown bars. Semis and drunken drivers were common. Back when 18yr-olds could get into bars, college students would ride to the bars on bikes (and back) and get into all sorts of trouble.
There was an ancient bridge at the bottom of a ravine that was just barely wide enough for two cars to pass. Very dangerous. Last year they finally bulldozed a few houses adjacent to the old bridge, tore it out and put in a wider version.
Everybody was happy with the ban. I would be very uncomfortable riding on that street even without the bicycle ban. The bicycle lanes on the adjacent one-way streets are very useful for getting from campus uptown to the "Square."
Yes, I agree with the bicycle ban on our street. I lived on that street from 1970 through 1993. It is very narrow and in portions there is a steep embankment on one side with a decaying "sidewalk" six feet above grade and no sidewalk on the other side, Telephone poles are within one foot of the curb (I unintentionally hit one with my hand once years ago when my arm was hanging out the window as a passenger in a car. Dang that hurt.)
The street is the most heavily traveled N-S street through town and is a direct route from campus to uptown bars. Semis and drunken drivers were common. Back when 18yr-olds could get into bars, college students would ride to the bars on bikes (and back) and get into all sorts of trouble.
There was an ancient bridge at the bottom of a ravine that was just barely wide enough for two cars to pass. Very dangerous. Last year they finally bulldozed a few houses adjacent to the old bridge, tore it out and put in a wider version.
Everybody was happy with the ban. I would be very uncomfortable riding on that street even without the bicycle ban. The bicycle lanes on the adjacent one-way streets are very useful for getting from campus uptown to the "Square."
What's the speed limit on this road, btw? How about the bike laned street? The bridge problem sounds like an issue for cars only. Where's the danger for a 3 foot wide cyclist?
#21
Slow ride, take it easy -
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corn, corn, corn, corn, corn, corn, soybean, corn fields of Illinois
Posts: 252
Bikes: 98 Mongoose Cambridge with Xtracycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yep, its the truth. The street is residential, but gets an inordinate amount of traffic. Stop signs, but no stop lights.
Since the street is a main throughfare between campus and bars, there were problems with intoxicated students driving cars as well as riding bicycles. The speed limit is 30 MPH on this street as well as the two adjacent one-way streets that have bike lanes.
Since they replaced the bridge with a new, wider one, there has been talk this last year of widening the entire street to make it safer. This, of course, has been met with resistance from property owners who would see their front yards (what little there is of them) disappear and have their front doors end up almost on the street.
They are currently widening another N-S residential street four blocks away to make it safer and to shift some of the traffic away from this narrow residential street.
Since the street is a main throughfare between campus and bars, there were problems with intoxicated students driving cars as well as riding bicycles. The speed limit is 30 MPH on this street as well as the two adjacent one-way streets that have bike lanes.
Since they replaced the bridge with a new, wider one, there has been talk this last year of widening the entire street to make it safer. This, of course, has been met with resistance from property owners who would see their front yards (what little there is of them) disappear and have their front doors end up almost on the street.
They are currently widening another N-S residential street four blocks away to make it safer and to shift some of the traffic away from this narrow residential street.
Last edited by Frankenbiker; 12-15-06 at 01:37 PM.
#22
Spelling Snob
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 2,862
Bikes: Panasonic DX4000, Bianchi Pista
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
The Anna,TX ban is on a 2-lane, 2-way highway with no shoulder. Id never ride that in the first
place. Anyway its an illegal law because its a state highway, and Texas doesnt allow cities to decide
rules of use for a state road.
place. Anyway its an illegal law because its a state highway, and Texas doesnt allow cities to decide
rules of use for a state road.
__________________
The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!
The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 196
Bikes: '05 Lemond Sarthe - Yes! the orange one!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
<<Thread Hijack>>
Newsflash!!! Frankenbiker has discovered the only hill in "the cornfields of Illinois"!!
<<End Hijack>>
Newsflash!!! Frankenbiker has discovered the only hill in "the cornfields of Illinois"!!
<<End Hijack>>
#24
Commuter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 2,568
Bikes: 2006 Giant Cypress EX (7-speed internal hub)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jwc
(C) Whenever a usable designated path for bicycles has been provided adjacent to a roadway, bicycle riders shall use such path and shall not use the roadway.
Less clear is if you believe the path to be unsafe, does that make it "unusable" in the eyes of the law? Bad news is, probably not. As to it's actual safety, I think that depends mostly on if it crosses a lot of side roads or turn-ins, and how those intersections are handled. If you notice a dangerous-looking side path being built, someone better either challenge the building of it, or challenge the law requiring you to use it.
#25
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Frankenbiker
Yep, its the truth. The street is residential, but gets an inordinate amount of traffic. Stop signs, but no stop lights.
Since the street is a main throughfare between campus and bars, there were problems with intoxicated students driving cars as well as riding bicycles. The speed limit is 30 MPH on this street as well as the two adjacent one-way streets that have bike lanes.
Since they replaced the bridge with a new, wider one, there has been talk this last year of widening the entire street to make it safer. This, of course, has been met with resistance from property owners who would see their front yards (what little there is of them) disappear and have their front doors end up almost on the street.
They are currently widening another N-S residential street four blocks away to make it safer and to shift some of the traffic away from this narrow residential street.
Since the street is a main throughfare between campus and bars, there were problems with intoxicated students driving cars as well as riding bicycles. The speed limit is 30 MPH on this street as well as the two adjacent one-way streets that have bike lanes.
Since they replaced the bridge with a new, wider one, there has been talk this last year of widening the entire street to make it safer. This, of course, has been met with resistance from property owners who would see their front yards (what little there is of them) disappear and have their front doors end up almost on the street.
They are currently widening another N-S residential street four blocks away to make it safer and to shift some of the traffic away from this narrow residential street.