Driving is a right, not a priviledge
02-23-07, 08:24 PM
#1
The Rock Cycle
Thread Starter
Driving is a right, not a priviledge
https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/conte...y_hearing.html
Vehicular homicide suspect allowed to drive
By MIKE WIGGINS The Daily Sentinel
Friday, February 23, 2007
A judge ruled Thursday that a Fruita man charged with killing a woman in a drunken-driving accident a year ago can drive his vehicle, lifting a restriction normally imposed in vehicular homicide cases.
Mesa County District Judge Richard Gurley told 24-year-old Jade Huskey he can drive to and from work and classes at Mesa State College but must pay for the installation of an interlock device in his truck. The device, which Huskey must blow into each time he drives, will detect whether there is any alcohol in his system. If there is, his truck will not start because the device is connected to the ignition system.
The ruling came after defense attorney Gordon Gallagher filed a motion asking Gurley to modify Huskey’s bond conditions.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Tammy Eret objected to allowing Huskey to drive, saying bond conditions exist to protect the community and that a no-driving condition is standard in vehicular homicide cases. She said Huskey’s blood-alcohol level was 0.26 at the time of the accident, more than three times the legal limit for drivers in Colorado, and that he was driving more than 100 mph when the accident happened.
Gallagher, though, said no-driving conditions should be considered on a case-by-case basis. He noted Huskey has no prior criminal history, has been cooperative with police and is reporting to the Mesa County Criminal Justice Services Department for alcohol tests.
“These are serious allegations, but they are only allegations at this point,” Gurley said.
Huskey is charged with killing 35-year-old Molly Gomez of Grand Junction in a car accident west of the city on Feb. 25, 2006. Colorado State Patrol investigators initially believed Gomez was driving the vehicle, but after further investigation concluded Huskey was driving.
According to court records, the position of the driver’s seat and damage to the steering wheel were consistent with someone Huskey’s height and weight driving the vehicle, not Gomez.
Investigators also said they found red or pink fibers imbedded in the steering wheel that were consistent with the color of the shirt Huskey was wearing the night of the accident.
Surveillance video from a Fruita liquor store Huskey and Gomez visited shortly before the accident showed Huskey getting out of and into the driver’s seat of the car, according to court records.
Huskey told investigators immediately after the accident he didn’t even remember being in the vehicle at the time of the accident but admitted he had drunk too much alcohol, according to court records.
Huskey, who has been charged with two counts of vehicular homicide and single counts of criminally negligent homicide, driving under the influence of alcohol and reckless driving, will return to court March 20.
He is free from the Mesa County Jail on $50,000 bond.
Mike Wiggins can be reached via e-mail at mwiggins@gjds. com.
Vehicular homicide suspect allowed to drive
By MIKE WIGGINS The Daily Sentinel
Friday, February 23, 2007
A judge ruled Thursday that a Fruita man charged with killing a woman in a drunken-driving accident a year ago can drive his vehicle, lifting a restriction normally imposed in vehicular homicide cases.
Mesa County District Judge Richard Gurley told 24-year-old Jade Huskey he can drive to and from work and classes at Mesa State College but must pay for the installation of an interlock device in his truck. The device, which Huskey must blow into each time he drives, will detect whether there is any alcohol in his system. If there is, his truck will not start because the device is connected to the ignition system.
The ruling came after defense attorney Gordon Gallagher filed a motion asking Gurley to modify Huskey’s bond conditions.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Tammy Eret objected to allowing Huskey to drive, saying bond conditions exist to protect the community and that a no-driving condition is standard in vehicular homicide cases. She said Huskey’s blood-alcohol level was 0.26 at the time of the accident, more than three times the legal limit for drivers in Colorado, and that he was driving more than 100 mph when the accident happened.
Gallagher, though, said no-driving conditions should be considered on a case-by-case basis. He noted Huskey has no prior criminal history, has been cooperative with police and is reporting to the Mesa County Criminal Justice Services Department for alcohol tests.
“These are serious allegations, but they are only allegations at this point,” Gurley said.
Huskey is charged with killing 35-year-old Molly Gomez of Grand Junction in a car accident west of the city on Feb. 25, 2006. Colorado State Patrol investigators initially believed Gomez was driving the vehicle, but after further investigation concluded Huskey was driving.
According to court records, the position of the driver’s seat and damage to the steering wheel were consistent with someone Huskey’s height and weight driving the vehicle, not Gomez.
Investigators also said they found red or pink fibers imbedded in the steering wheel that were consistent with the color of the shirt Huskey was wearing the night of the accident.
Surveillance video from a Fruita liquor store Huskey and Gomez visited shortly before the accident showed Huskey getting out of and into the driver’s seat of the car, according to court records.
Huskey told investigators immediately after the accident he didn’t even remember being in the vehicle at the time of the accident but admitted he had drunk too much alcohol, according to court records.
Huskey, who has been charged with two counts of vehicular homicide and single counts of criminally negligent homicide, driving under the influence of alcohol and reckless driving, will return to court March 20.
He is free from the Mesa County Jail on $50,000 bond.
Mike Wiggins can be reached via e-mail at mwiggins@gjds. com.
__________________
Gunnar Sport
Specialized Ruby
Salsa Vaya Ti
Novara Randonee x2
Motobecane Fantom CXX
Jamis Dakar XCR
Gunnar Sport
Specialized Ruby
Salsa Vaya Ti
Novara Randonee x2
Motobecane Fantom CXX
Jamis Dakar XCR
02-23-07, 09:35 PM
#3
Commuter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 2,568
Bikes: 2006 Giant Cypress EX (7-speed internal hub)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not sure what this article has to do with bicycling, other than the conclusion you've drawn from it and used as the thread subject, but that statement, driving being a right not a privilege, puts a question into my mind.
When you say driving is right, not a privilege, do you include driving a bike in that? We often talk about cyclists having a right to the road, and after all, we aren't required to have a license to use our vehicles on it, as motorists are. So does that mean that cyclists have an unfettered right to the road (legally speaking) but to motorists, it's only a privilege? That would mean our right is superior to theirs! That's kind of an interesting thought...
Or is it a a privilege to both cyclists and motorists, albeit an unregulated and largely unenforced one?
When you say driving is right, not a privilege, do you include driving a bike in that? We often talk about cyclists having a right to the road, and after all, we aren't required to have a license to use our vehicles on it, as motorists are. So does that mean that cyclists have an unfettered right to the road (legally speaking) but to motorists, it's only a privilege? That would mean our right is superior to theirs! That's kind of an interesting thought...
Or is it a a privilege to both cyclists and motorists, albeit an unregulated and largely unenforced one?
02-24-07, 02:32 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBrooking
When you say driving is right, not a privilege, do you include driving a bike in that? We often talk about cyclists having a right to the road, and after all, we aren't required to have a license to use our vehicles on it, as motorists are. So does that mean that cyclists have an unfettered right to the road (legally speaking) but to motorists, it's only a privilege? That would mean our right is superior to theirs! That's kind of an interesting thought...
Or is it a a privilege to both cyclists and motorists, albeit an unregulated and largely unenforced one?
Or is it a a privilege to both cyclists and motorists, albeit an unregulated and largely unenforced one?
So, everyone has a right to the use of the road - you can walk on it, ride a bike on it, cross it, stomp on it, or, if you are a licensed driver, you may also operate a motorized vehicle upon it.
I think the thread title was intended as a sort of cute eye-catcher.
Personally, I feel that the DUI issue would be greatly diminished if all autos were equipped with interlock devices. We no longer allow drivers to start cars while they are in gear. If you have a manual transmission, you can no longer use the starter to make the car lurch forward - you have to hold the clutch down in order to operate the starter (I am old enough to remember when that was not so).
Many recent makes of cars with automatic trannys will not allow you to operate the starter without first depressing the brake pedal (this to overcome allegations that cars were at fault in some accidents where vehicles ran into buildings, etc). All these setups represent forms of ignition interlock.
What would be so terrible about equipping every vehicle with an alcohol-sensitive interlock system?
If all cars had them, the cost of the system would come down greatly, and the savings in lives and misery would be great. Of course, the courts would look deserted, and an entire industry would go the way of the typewriter - but we could introduce gambling or legalized prostitution to make up for the lost revenue.
Caruso
02-24-07, 06:09 AM
#5
Perineal Pressurized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBrooking
I'm not sure what this article has to do with bicycling
https://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapc....ap/index.html
Heck, Helmet Head could probably work the angle that the premature detonation would not have occurred had the cyclists been asserting thier right to the lane.
Fromt the article
“These are serious allegations, but they are only allegations at this point,” Gurley said.
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
02-24-07, 11:09 AM
#6
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Carusoswi
...
What would be so terrible about equipping every vehicle with an alcohol-sensitive interlock system?
If all cars had them, the cost of the system would come down greatly, and the savings in lives and misery would be great. Of course, the courts would look deserted, and an entire industry would go the way of the typewriter - but we could introduce gambling or legalized prostitution to make up for the lost revenue.
Caruso
What would be so terrible about equipping every vehicle with an alcohol-sensitive interlock system?
If all cars had them, the cost of the system would come down greatly, and the savings in lives and misery would be great. Of course, the courts would look deserted, and an entire industry would go the way of the typewriter - but we could introduce gambling or legalized prostitution to make up for the lost revenue.
Caruso
A better sensor, but one which is nowhere close to being ready from a technological standpoint, is one which monitors some aspect of the driver's body which is linked to reaction times. Perhaps there could be a camera trained on the driver's eyes, and a simple test which is to follow a running line of lights across the dashboard and the camera measures how well the driver's eyes track the lights. This would guard against overly tired drivers, and drivers under the influence of drugs other than alcohol.
Good ideas, if they can be made transparent, but I don't think the technology is ready yet.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
02-24-07, 05:35 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 478
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eofelis
“These are serious allegations, but they are only allegations at this point,” Gurley said.
Huskey is charged with killing 35-year-old Molly Gomez of Grand Junction in a car accident west of the city on Feb. 25, 2006. Colorado State Patrol investigators initially believed Gomez was driving the vehicle, but after further investigation concluded Huskey was driving.
According to court records, the position of the driver’s seat and damage to the steering wheel were consistent with someone Huskey’s height and weight driving the vehicle, not Gomez.
Investigators also said they found red or pink fibers imbedded in the steering wheel that were consistent with the color of the shirt Huskey was wearing the night of the accident.
Surveillance video from a Fruita liquor store Huskey and Gomez visited shortly before the accident showed Huskey getting out of and into the driver’s seat of the car, according to court records.
Huskey is charged with killing 35-year-old Molly Gomez of Grand Junction in a car accident west of the city on Feb. 25, 2006. Colorado State Patrol investigators initially believed Gomez was driving the vehicle, but after further investigation concluded Huskey was driving.
According to court records, the position of the driver’s seat and damage to the steering wheel were consistent with someone Huskey’s height and weight driving the vehicle, not Gomez.
Investigators also said they found red or pink fibers imbedded in the steering wheel that were consistent with the color of the shirt Huskey was wearing the night of the accident.
Surveillance video from a Fruita liquor store Huskey and Gomez visited shortly before the accident showed Huskey getting out of and into the driver’s seat of the car, according to court records.
03-07-07, 02:53 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 760
Bikes: Road, Mtn, Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rights & privileges
Originally Posted by JohnBrooking
We often talk about cyclists having a right to the road, and after all, we aren't required to have a license to use our vehicles on it, as motorists are. So does that mean that cyclists have an unfettered right to the road (legally speaking) but to motorists, it's only a privilege?
__________________
Humantransport.org: Advocacy on behalf of humans traveling under their own power
Humantransport.org: Advocacy on behalf of humans traveling under their own power
03-10-07, 12:08 PM
#9
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: western Washington
Posts: 293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We just lost a family friend--who was driving her car, I don't even think she owned a bike--to a repeat-offender DUI. I do believe that ANYTHING which would crack and break the American car-transportation culture would be a good thing. If local, state, and federal governments lack the spine to control homicidal drivers, than blessed be any event or people who cause our access to cheap oil to come to a screeching halt.
