Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

The Bike Safety & Responsibility Bill Shows Life In House

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

The Bike Safety & Responsibility Bill Shows Life In House

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-10, 08:43 AM
  #1  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sioux City, Iowa
Posts: 825

Bikes: Vision R40 Recumbent

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Bike Safety & Responsibility Bill Shows Life In House

For those that are able to please ask the Representatives to support this.

Senate File 117 remains alive after passing one chamber of
the Iowa Legislature. The bill is currently in the Human
Resources Committee. View the amendment. See sample email
below. The amendment addresses the following:


1. Bicyclists must obey signs and signals.

2. When passing a bicycle, a motorist must maintain 5' of
distance from the bicyclist.

3. Vulnerable users is defined as:
As used in this section, the term “vulnerable user of a
highway” means any of the following persons using a highway,
including a crosswalk, the roadway, or the shoulder adjacent
to the roadway:
a. A pedestrian.
b. A person riding an animal.
c. A person operating a farm tractor or implement of
husbandry without an enclosed shell.
d. A person on a skateboard.
e. A person using in-line skates or roller skates.
f. A highway worker.
g. A person on an electric scooter.
h. A person on a bicycle.

4. A person operating a motor vehicle shall not steer the
motor vehicle, in a careless or imprudent manner,
unnecessarily close to or toward a vulnerable user of a highway.

5. A person shall not knowingly project any object or
substance at or against a vulnerable user of a highway.


Please contact the following members of the House Human
Resources Committee. Please tell them to support the
amended Bike Safety and Responsibility Bill.

BIKE BILL NEEDS YOUR HELP!

The Iowa Bicycle Coalition and its partners are pushing for
the amendment and passage of the Bicycle Safety Bill, Senate
File 117.

Our first step this legislative session is approval by the
full House Human Resources Committee.
Please contact the members of the House Human Resources
Committee (listed below) TODAY and ask them to:
*Support the updated bicycle safety bill.
*SF 117 with it proposed amendment is fair to both
bicyclists and motorists.

Committee Members:
Rep. Mark Smith (mark.smith@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Deb Berry (deborah.berry@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Linda Miller (linda.miller@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Ako Abdul-Samad (ako.abdul-samad@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Dwayne Alons (dwayne.alons@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Clel Baudler (clel.baudler@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Greg Forristal (greg.forristall@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Dave Heaton (dave.heaton@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Lisa Heddens (lisa.heddens@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Bruce Hunter (bruce.hunter@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Kevin Koester (kevin.koester@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Mary Mascher (mary.mascher@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Tyler Olson (tyler.olson@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Janet Petersen (janet.petersen@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Renee Schulte (renee.schulte@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Chuck Soderberg (chuck.soderberg@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Sharon Steckman (sharon.steckman@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Phyllis Thede (phyllis.thede@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Linda Upmeyer (linda.upmeyer@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Roger Wendt (roger.wendt@legis.state.ia.us)
Rep. Beth Wessel-Krieschell
(beth.wessel-kroeschell@legis.state.ia.us)

SAMPLE EMAIL

Dear Representative NAME,

Please support the amended SF 117, the Bike Safety and
Responsibility Bill. The bill is fair to both bicyclists
and motorist.

The required passing distance could save lives. The
dangerous behavior towards vulnerable highway users should
not be tolerated in Iowa.


Sincerely,

YOUR NAME
Links:
https://www.bikeiowa.com/asp/hotnews/...sp?NewsID=4312
https://www.iowabicyclecoalition.org/node/297

Last edited by Square & Compas; 01-27-10 at 12:06 PM. Reason: Forgot to add links. Added now.
Square & Compas is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 09:19 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Devil's advocate: as much as I like it when people pass me with a wide berth, why 5' as opposed to the standard 3'? After all, uniformity in traffic law is usually a good thing, right?
Ngchen is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 09:21 AM
  #3  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sioux City, Iowa
Posts: 825

Bikes: Vision R40 Recumbent

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ngchen
Devil's advocate: as much as I like it when people pass me with a wide berth, why 5' as opposed to the standard 3'? After all, uniformity in traffic law is usually a good thing, right?
I honestly do not know why not 3'.
Square & Compas is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 09:26 AM
  #4  
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
3 feet is not sufficient buffer particularily at high speeds. 3 feet is only arbitrary anyways, there is no '3 foot passing clearance in the UVC.

if anything, 5 feet clearance should be the number states set as a passing clearance of a vulnerable road user. its the vulnerable road users that are being protected, LOS is not longer the prime directive, there has been a shift in the design focus of road cooridors towards ped and bicyclist safety across the country.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 09:45 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
GraysonPeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL 32304, USA
Posts: 353

Bikes: Trek Pure Trike (recently bought)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmm... Interesting. I'd like to see the same happen in Florida.
GraysonPeddie is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 09:48 AM
  #6  
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,715

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Have you been passed with 3 feet of clearance by a car doing 45? It's too close.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 12:02 PM
  #7  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sioux City, Iowa
Posts: 825

Bikes: Vision R40 Recumbent

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I sent the email to all of the representatives listed. I got this response back from Representative Mark Smith:

Dear Johnathan:

Thank you for contacting me about the bicycle bill. I introduced the bill in the House and am an avid cyclist myself. I will be supporting the amendment to SF 117.

Thank you, Mark
Square & Compas is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 12:18 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Posts: 3,770

Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ngchen
Devil's advocate: as much as I like it when people pass me with a wide berth, why 5' as opposed to the standard 3'? After all, uniformity in traffic law is usually a good thing, right?
I'm thinking margin of error. Many drivers, otherwise fine people some of them, can't even get centered in parking lines.
gcottay is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 12:35 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Ngchen
Devil's advocate: as much as I like it when people pass me with a wide berth, why 5' as opposed to the standard 3'? After all, uniformity in traffic law is usually a good thing, right?
Ks requires 4' space, I like the idea of 5'. The more space between higher speed traffic and slower speed traffic the better.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 12:54 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Speedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 1,998

Bikes: Univega Gran Turismo, Guerciotti, Bridgestone MB2, Bike Friday New World Tourist, Serotta Ti

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As a practical matter, one would have to increase the threshold for a lane that is considered "substandard" if the passing distance is 5' vice 3'. Suddenly lots of roads with lanes that were previously considered shareable might now be two feet too narrow.

On the other hand. Good luck getting anyone to enforce 5'. I'm not see any particular attention paid to the 3' we have in Massachusetts.

Speedo
Speedo is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 03:36 PM
  #11  
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Doohickie
Have you been passed with 3 feet of clearance by a car doing 45? It's too close.
I've been passed closer than that at 60, and it doesn't really bother me. But I guess it would freak out a lot of people.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 04:37 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Bikepacker67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogopogo's shoreline
Posts: 4,082

Bikes: LHT, Kona Smoke

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I know I give 5 feet to parked cars...
Those damn things scare me!

Bikepacker67 is offline  
Old 01-27-10, 06:26 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Doohickie
Have you been passed with 3 feet of clearance by a car doing 45? It's too close.
Hell, I got passed last week by a car doing 60 -- about 2 feet away! Now THAT'S too close!
DX-MAN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bbbean
Advocacy & Safety
66
10-22-16 11:57 AM
mattontheroad
Advocacy & Safety
29
02-11-16 02:54 PM
FrederickH
Fifty Plus (50+)
3
02-19-12 10:56 AM
Rancid
Advocacy & Safety
764
11-17-11 06:04 AM
mtnmn
Advocacy & Safety
1
10-03-11 02:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.