Two breeds of biker -- NYC cyclists talk about bike lanes
|
lets take manhattan back to 1986, when the mayor planned for a complete ban of bikes from midtown manhattan.
maybe NYC needs more protected facilities, better enforcement along class II bikeways. As cities develop a critical mass of cyclists utilizing roadway infrastructure for bicycle transportation, compliance with traffic direction, signals, etc tends to increase - there are very few wrong way riding, red light running cyclists in infrastructure rich copenhagen, for example. glad to see new yorkers are willing, like the rest of americans, to complain about their commutes. |
This is interesting because it mirrors my own experience with bike lanes in the UK. Too often they trap the cyclist next to the kerb, and then turn into what are effectively MUPs - with cars turning or parking, trucks delivering, pedestrians wandering about, and other cyclists meandering about at 5 mph. All this makes the cyclist more vulnerable rather than less, not least because they are unable to keep up with the flow of traffic and are therefore going too slowly to move out safely into the traffic when they do have to avoid an obstruction in the bike lane. Generally speaking when I encounter a bike lane as poorly designed and positioned as this, I ignore it and ride normally in the traffic. I'm safer that way, and so are those around me. The woman in the video pretty much summed it up for me.
|
I actively avoid riding in bike lanes, almost every potentially dangerous incident that I have been involved in here has been because I was not taking up my own lane of traffic.
|
That's why I don't like bike lanes that are in between the curb and parking lane.
It looks like they took out a traffic lane anyways. Why not just stripe the entire right or left lane as a bike lane? Why'd they have to go and put it between parked cars and the curb? |
Our city just added some new bike lanes, which is fine in helping some beginning riders get used to traffic, but now they have become debris collectors like all our other local bike lanes. Due to budget constraints, our city's street sweeping has been curtailed to the point of being almost nonexistent, which only exacerbates the debris accumulation in the bike lane.
As for the new lanes, a mile long addition has a 5 foot gutter pan on one side, and a 7 foot parking/5 foot lane on the other. On one family outing, two family members defaulted to the empty parking side of the street and going salmon in the process, citing that the 5 foot gutter lane as being "too tight" with traffic. |
The problem is not the bike lane, the problem is the poor design of the bike lane... some of the cyclists mentioned very specific issues... "everyone takes a left off of first;" "pedestrians;" "cars parked in the bike lanes."
First and foremost the bikelane is poorly designed... apparently on the wrong side of the street, second there is no enforcement of the BL... the classic problem for cyclists, no matter where they ride... in a BL or on the road, as long as there is a lack of enforcement, motorists will try to get away with anything and cyclists will be the victims. Now all that said, what is the solution? How about sharrows... or better yet, train motorists that cyclists have the same rights to the road as motorists and ticket wrong way cyclists. |
Originally Posted by chasm54
(Post 11535487)
This is interesting because it mirrors my own experience with bike lanes in the UK. Too often they trap the cyclist next to the kerb, and then turn into what are effectively MUPs - with cars turning or parking, trucks delivering, pedestrians wandering about, and other cyclists meandering about at 5 mph. All this makes the cyclist more vulnerable rather than less, not least because they are unable to keep up with the flow of traffic and are therefore going too slowly to move out safely into the traffic when they do have to avoid an obstruction in the bike lane. Generally speaking when I encounter a bike lane as poorly designed and positioned as this, I ignore it and ride normally in the traffic. I'm safer that way, and so are those around me. The woman in the video pretty much summed it up for me.
I agree that bike lanes like the one on 1st avenue NYC there in the video there are a bad idea, especially when they are partly seperated from "ordinary" traffic. |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 11535965)
The problem is not the bike lane, the problem is the poor design of the bike lane... some of the cyclists mentioned very specific issues... "everyone takes a left off of first;" "pedestrians;" "cars parked in the bike lanes."
First and foremost the bikelane is poorly designed... apparently on the wrong side of the street, What's wrong with the alternative of just "flying down the right hand side" as one interviewee suggested, for those that want to go straight and anyone that wants to go left can stay in the left lane instead of being trapped over on the right.
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 11535965)
Now all that said, what is the solution? How about sharrows... or better yet, train motorists that cyclists have the same rights to the road as motorists and ticket wrong way cyclists.
|
i wonder why ridership across NYC is on the upswing.
It CAN'T have anything to do with reclaiming the streets for bicyclists as viable transport across New York City. |
I don't think I can ever complain about salmon after seeing that video. Yikes!
|
More than 200,000 a day now cycling from the New York Times Newsroom......
over 200,000 a day cycling "I think it’s kind of amazing,” Mr. Komanoff said, comparing the number of riders now to the 1980s. “I think it is now legitimate to refer to cycling as a mainstream mode of travel. And to me, that is a profound development.” |
Originally Posted by mikeshoup
(Post 11535821)
It looks like they took out a traffic lane anyways. Why not just stripe the entire right or left lane as a bike lane? Why'd they have to go and put it between parked cars and the curb?
|
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 11536341)
More than 200,000 a day now cycling from the New York Times Newsroom......
Apart from that in order to prove your extremist Segregationist viewpoint you need to show that there is not a similar increase in bicycling in cities with similar starting proportions of bicycle commuters. It's amazing how you can look at that video and not see the problems with bikelanes in urban environments which lack: 1. Traffic lights privileging bicyclists 2. Law enforcement keeping pedestrians and motor traffic out of the way 3. Laws placing assumed fault on motorists during any collisions |
Originally Posted by Zizka
(Post 11536415)
Having the parked cars there makes people feel safe, and it's all about how people feel, not actual safety.
|
Originally Posted by invisiblehand
(Post 11536462)
Now this is a scary statement.
|
Originally Posted by Zizka
(Post 11538489)
Yep. It seems to me to be the most probable reason why stuff like that keeps getting built. What are the alternatives? The only one I can think of is the designers are idiots.
On the other hand "idiot" may also play into it... we had a bike lane designed and built here in San Diego that was done primarily to slow down motorists... This was told to me directly by the engineer that designed the installation. The benefit was not intended for cyclists, but to protect motorists from themselves. I would avoid that BL except that it goes where I go. (I used to take the lane) |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 11539036)
Or not cyclists... and thus have no clue as to what cyclists actually need.
|
Indexed accident rates along NYC bikeways are likely dropping, like other cities in the US that plan for bikes in the transportation mix.
NYC has come a long, positive way for bicyclists since the mid-80s, fer shure. |
Originally Posted by dynodonn
(Post 11539992)
Or just meeting some minimum standard compromise.
|
no, all categories of NYC bikeways are vetted by AASHTO either as standard and accepted design or as an experimental installation that will be assessed for efficacy and safety.
here's a little tidbit - left hand bikelanes on one way streets? REDUCES CHANCE OF DOORING BY DESIGN. |
Originally Posted by dynodonn
(Post 11539992)
Or just meeting some minimum standard compromise.
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 11541527)
no, all categories of NYC bikeways are vetted by AASHTO either as standard and accepted design or as an experimental installation that will be assessed for efficacy and safety.
here's a little tidbit - left hand bikelanes on one way streets? REDUCES CHANCE OF DOORING BY DESIGN. AASHTO allows bike lanes in door zones... so not such a great standard actually. |
how much room do you think you need? 8, 10 feet from the parked cars?
ooooh the dreaded "doorzone bikelane" is so radioactive! :rolleyes: Current standard AASHTO bikelanes are not the minefield those that disparage roadway treatments for bicyclists make them out to be. Anyhooo, Genec -you are familiar with the new buffered Class II bikelanes being implemented in NYC? here's a link to a film from NYC DOT describing the new NYC roadway design treatments for bicyclists for those disparaging them. NYC has come a long way for bicyclists since the mid '80s. http://www.streetfilms.org/bike-lanes-in-the-big-apple/ |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 11541527)
no, all categories of NYC bikeways are vetted by AASHTO either as standard and accepted design or as an experimental installation that will be assessed for efficacy and safety.
I find it surprising considering that the conversations and meetings that I have had locally seem to focus on the MUTCD. Assuming that the bike lane in question falls under the second category, then it appears that the video is rather informative. |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 11541931)
how much room do you think you need? 8, 10 feet from the parked cars?
I'm surprised, this is so "autocentric" of you Bek! |
perhaps my wording was awkward.
Roadway design standards are codified by the MUTCD and vetted by AASHTO. Cities either place approved or experimental road infrastructure. designs out of standard compliance or not experimental usually don't make it past the design phase. classs I bikeways as currently being implemented along select road corridors in NYC are most assuredly vetted by highway officials. |
so much whining..... you got some bike lanes, be happy, already!
|
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 11541527)
no, all categories of NYC bikeways are vetted by AASHTO either as standard and accepted design or as an experimental installation that will be assessed for efficacy and safety.
here's a little tidbit - left hand bikelanes on one way streets? REDUCES CHANCE OF DOORING BY DESIGN. Reducing the chance of dooring might be true if the parking lane was next to the curb. More cars have people getting out of the driver's side than the passenger's. However, with the bike lane in between the curb and the parking lane, I don't see how it would be any better. People who are doored will be dumped onto the sidewalk and not into overtaking traffic, so I guess that is an improvement. The lane in the video does provide a good deal of space, so dooring probably isn't a major concern there. |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 11541931)
how much room do you think you need? 8, 10 feet from the parked cars?
ooooh the dreaded "doorzone bikelane" is so radioactive! :rolleyes: Current standard AASHTO bikelanes are not the minefield those that disparage roadway treatments for bicyclists make them out to be. Anyhooo, Genec -you are familiar with the new buffered Class II bikelanes being implemented in NYC? here's a link to a film from NYC DOT describing the new NYC roadway design treatments for bicyclists for those disparaging them. NYC has come a long way for bicyclists since the mid '80s. http://www.streetfilms.org/bike-lanes-in-the-big-apple/ Look, the truth is I have mixed feelings about BL... I like them as they tell motorists we cyclists belong on the road. I like them as they define lanes and help defray the animosity of shared lanes; I don't like them as they seem to tell motorists that this ONLY where cyclists should be, I don't like them as they are often an afterthought and poorly implemented. I use BL when they suit my purpose... and by the looks of the video presented in the OP, I would probably be riding outside of the BL quite often in NYC... Say what you will about "radioactive door zone BL," I have been doored before; I stay out of door zones. Frankly I think NYC can do better than MUTCD or AASHTO... NYC has defined quite a few fire codes for use in the US, perhaps they should take a stand and rework standards for cyclists... standards that include bike specific signal lights and safe zones for cyclists. |
Originally Posted by Zizka
(Post 11542194)
I'm glad I don't live where my safety is subject to experimentation without my consent.
Reducing the chance of dooring might be true if the parking lane was next to the curb. More cars have people getting out of the driver's side than the passenger's. However, with the bike lane in between the curb and the parking lane, I don't see how it would be any better. People who are doored will be dumped onto the sidewalk and not into overtaking traffic, so I guess that is an improvement. The lane in the video does provide a good deal of space, so dooring probably isn't a major concern there. Your safety is constantly subject to "experimentation without my consent." Remember the first air bags in cars? How is your municipal water tested? Is every item in your house UL tested... to what standard? Do you own a cell phone? Do you eat foods approved by the FDA? Do you eat organic? Had eggs lately? Buy any cleaning products? Have roads in your area ever been modified from their original design? Take any prescription drugs? Sorry, you live in an evolving world... sometimes that means you are "subject to experimentation without consent" with the hope that the results will benefit all. That is just reality. Get over it. Now crawl out of bed and go face the world. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:33 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.