![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
(Post 15429450)
But your example is flawed as Rydabent pointed out. Your logic is assuming that rider b has never had an accident and thus with his experience and safety record he would be safer then rider a...duh! But that still doesn't mean that tomorrow rider b goes out and has a not at fault accident that gave him severe brain damage or death due to failure to strap on a helmet. Not all accidents are the riders fault, and that's another flaw in your logic, your assuming he's never going to crash because he's never going to be at fault, you left out the other guy entirely.
|
|
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
(Post 15429644)
Your flawed again, you cannot feign being in a thinking mode when you're actually asleep.
|
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
(Post 15429450)
But your example is flawed as Rydabent pointed out. Your logic is assuming that rider b has never had an accident and thus with his experience and safety record he would be safer then rider a...duh! But that still doesn't mean that tomorrow rider b goes out and has a not at fault accident that gave him severe brain damage or death due to failure to strap on a helmet. Not all accidents are the riders fault, and that's another flaw in your logic, your assuming he's never going to crash because he's never going to be at fault, you left out the other guy entirely.
I do not assume that rider B never had an accident, or that he has a flawless safety record. Riders with more experience and experience riding in different conditions are safer riders, suffering less crashes than inexperienced riders, exhibiting a lower crash rate per miles traveled than inexperienced riders. Helmets are not proof against severe brain damage/death, so no safety nod to rider A according to your specific situation; accidents not attributable to rider fault could happen to either rider, so no difference there, either. Although I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt -- experience on a bike usually means greater situational awareness, so a more experienced rider has a better chance of avoiding a "not at fault accident." I also am not assuming that rider B will never crash. Are you claiming that Rider A is the safer rider? |
Snappy comeback for snotty "Where's your helmet?"
I often get snotty shouts of "Where's your helmet?"
(Not that it matters much, but it often happens when I'm pedaling my cruiser to my gramma's around the corner, wearing a straw hat and seersucker ensemble in summer, say. Or if I'm on a ride on my own and it's 90F/90deg-humidity. I do wear a helmet on group rides, fast rides, etc. But that's just me.) Anyway, I searched but couldn't find any snappy comebacks. There have to be some. I've used "Where's your manners?" (Since adults chiding adults in public is terrible etiquette, and which due to bad etiquette's proximity to rudeness in turn comes close to fighting words.) I just heard about a good one on BikeSnobNYC today where a girl snottily says "Nice helmet" to a helment-less guy and the BikeSnob instructs that the correct reply in that situation is "Nice tits!" ...Winner so far, but limited opportunity. --JP |
Originally Posted by JeffOYB
(Post 15430564)
I've used "Where's your manners?" (Since adults chiding adults in public is terrible etiquette, and which due to bad etiquette's proximity to rudeness in turn comes close to fighting words.)
"You're wearing it, you M-Fing thief! Better yet, if you follow through.And now you have the nerve to mock me while you're wearing MY helmet. Give me my helmet back right now, or I'm going to knock your head off while you're wearing MY helmet" That should shut the moron up for awhile, though some morons are persistent with the where is your helmet gibberish; see this thread for proof. |
Originally Posted by JeffOYB
(Post 15430564)
BikeSnob instructs that the correct reply in that situation is "Nice tits!"
...Winner so far, but limited opportunity. Look them straight in the eye and say, "Nothing left up there, nothing worth protecting, nothing to lose. Wanna race?" |
I like
I have never EVER asked anyone where their helmet is. But after your last post I may start. If that person attempts to attack me as you suggest, he will end up sorry. He would not be smart on two accounts. First it would be assualt which is illegal, and second, he would not know what I did in the military which gets us back to his being sorry. |
Thank god for helmets
Crashed over the weekend. I was going down on Metcalf Rd. and after the 4th turn, I knew I was going to fast so I slowed down a lot on the entry of the 5th turn to make a safe turn since I couldn't tell what was behind it. Then ways away was another blind turn so I was clinching on both brakes to make sure that I'm at a safe speed... then it happened unexpectedly. My rear wheel locked up and I slid on my left side. Skidded for about 20 feet before I hit the mountain wall with my shoulder before I put a dent on my helmet after hitting a boulder on the wall. After inspecting my bike and realized that blood was gushing from my left hand, I couldn't figure out how the wheels locked on a straight away. It's a good thing there was a good samaritan who helped me bundled up my open wounds. Then I went to where the skid marked started. Then there it was. A long welt on the road - an elevated crack just like a welt mark on a skin - 2 feet from the skid mark. I may have clinched my brakes without me realizing it after the impact.
I'm all bandaged up on my upper left thigh, arms and knuckles, I have a bruised right shoulder and no concussion, I was conscious after impact, and thank you for my helmet or I would either been a vegetable right now, or not even here to post this. Surprisingly, the bike really is okay. I couldn't believe it took the impact. The only scratches are very minor on the left brakes and hardly noticeable, and the bar end cap and tape. I am going to have Trek inspect it next week when I'm a bit better. W When I'm 100% I will go back up there and really go down even slower and make a stop at the area where I hit my head and put a rosary. That could have been my death spot... |
Originally Posted by mconlonx
(Post 15425744)
Who is the safer rider?
Rider A) Wears a helmet. New hybrid, new rider. Casual rider, rides on sunny days, commuted to the office once, does some short shopping trips on the bike. Rider B) Does not wear a helmet, rides a 20 year old road bike, been riding for more than three decades, commutes, tours, rides in all weather and conditions. Who's the safer rider? Rider A) Wears a helmet. New hybrid, new rider. Casual rider, rides on sunny days, commuted to the office once, does some short shopping trips on the bike. Rider B) Does not wear a helmet. New hybrid, new rider. Casual rider, rides on sunny days, commuted to the office once, does some short shopping trips on the bike. No one who cares about a reasonable standard of evidence would argue that they can choose betwen Rider A and Rider B on the basis of safety. |
I prefer to thank the manufacturer
|
Originally Posted by pdedes
(Post 15434173)
I prefer to thank the manufacturer
Oh wait... you mean the HELMET's manufacturer! In all seriousness... glad you're (mostly) ok and will be riding again!!! |
Thanks for sharing. I know there are many who don't believe helmets have much value, but your story along with personal experiences reaffirm my belief that though they aren't perfect, they do offer a certain amount of insurance.
|
thanks for sharing
|
Originally Posted by gundom66
(Post 15434117)
I would either been a vegetable right now, or not even here to post this. ...That could have been my death spot...
On my end, it's worth wearing a helmet to avoid the much less serious injuries I just described. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by rydabent
(Post 15431499)
I like
I have never EVER asked anyone where their helmet is. But after your last post I may start. If that person attempts to attack me as you suggest, he will end up sorry. He would not be smart on two accounts. First it would be assualt which is illegal, and second, he would not know what I did in the military which gets us back to his being sorry. |
Originally Posted by gundom66
(Post 15434117)
thank you for my helmet or I would either been a vegetable right now, or not even here to post this.
|
What if rider A and B are one of the same, joined at the shoulders at birth but having two heads. Rider head A wears a helmet but rider head B does not, who survives in a crash resulting in both heads hitting the pavement at the same velocity?
|
Originally Posted by curbtender
(Post 15415718)
I've got a choice to wear a tight short brim Cinelli hat or my helmet. I'm riding through a congested city area then out to some nice country roads. I like the hat and the helmet doesn't hinder my riding. I'm one who's benefited from a helmet, backpack, long pants accident in a comute situation. Sometimes I'm more worried about losing skin then breaking a skull.
Having said that, maybe it is just my thick Irish skull that has prevented me from serious head injuries. I have bounced it off the pavement a couple times. I've also picked a lot of gravel out of arms, legs and other parts from spills. I also have some non-bike related skin grafts and I can attest that they are no fun. I still do not wear a helmet, nor knee or elbow pads (is that next?) I ride over 2000 mile a year. |
Originally Posted by JoshSlocum
(Post 15435566)
Thank you. I am 67 and have been riding a bike since I was 6. When people ask, "Why don't you wear a helmet?" I always (ALWAYS!!!) respond with, "I am more worried about losing skin."
Having said that, maybe it is just my thick Irish skull that has prevented me from serious head injuries. I have bounced it off the pavement a couple times. I've also picked a lot of gravel out of arms, legs and other parts from spills. I also have some non-bike related skin grafts and I can attest that they are no fun. I still do not wear a helmet, nor knee or elbow pads (is that next?) I ride over 2000 mile a year. |
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
(Post 15435549)
What if rider A and B are one of the same, joined at the shoulders at birth but having two heads. Rider head A wears a helmet but rider head B does not, who survives in a crash resulting in both heads hitting the pavement at the same velocity?
|
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
(Post 15435549)
What if rider A and B are one of the same, joined at the shoulders at birth but having two heads. Rider head A wears a helmet but rider head B does not, who survives in a crash resulting in both heads hitting the pavement at the same velocity?
|
Originally Posted by RazrSkutr
(Post 15434154)
Here's another way of thinking about it:
Who's the safer rider? Rider A) Wears a helmet. New hybrid, new rider. Casual rider, rides on sunny days, commuted to the office once, does some short shopping trips on the bike. Rider B) Does not wear a helmet. New hybrid, new rider. Casual rider, rides on sunny days, commuted to the office once, does some short shopping trips on the bike. No one who cares about a reasonable standard of evidence would argue that they can choose betwen Rider A and Rider B on the basis of safety. In the extremely unlikely event of a crash involving a strike to to the head which might result in a less than serious head injury, I'd expect the helmeted rider to sustain less injury. Since helmets have minimal bearing on safe cycling, the margin is slim, but the helmeted rider gets the "safer rider" nod, all other things being equal. |
Originally Posted by JoshSlocum
(Post 15435664)
Forgot to add: if a helmet makes you feel safer, more hip, or for whatever reason, then wear one. Just don't join the (industry lobby) effort to force me to wear one.
|
Originally Posted by MMACH 5
(Post 15436978)
I have yet to see anyone post in here in favor of mandatory helmet laws. MHLs were mentioned recently, but it's quite a unanimous opinion that they are championed and put into effect by non-cyclists.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.