View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#2251
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
so the Dutch who enjoy bicycling the most, use helmets the least and see fewer deaths than any other country. the Australians who enjoy mandatory helmet laws, a downturn in cycling and have had an increase in cycling related deaths.
again IMSO it ain't the helmets saving lives, it's better motorist habits and better cycling skills that don't even put helmets to use in the first place that's saving lives. but I'm not anti-anything here, I'm just sick of snooty, snotty, condescending attitudes using bad data and supposition to deride, degrade and taunt those that differ from the standard shtick.
we do not live in a black and white world. the helmet thread shouldn't be a black and white absolute. of coarse it's hilarious that they sell $200+ helmets that offer no better protection than a $30 helmet.
again IMSO it ain't the helmets saving lives, it's better motorist habits and better cycling skills that don't even put helmets to use in the first place that's saving lives. but I'm not anti-anything here, I'm just sick of snooty, snotty, condescending attitudes using bad data and supposition to deride, degrade and taunt those that differ from the standard shtick.
we do not live in a black and white world. the helmet thread shouldn't be a black and white absolute. of coarse it's hilarious that they sell $200+ helmets that offer no better protection than a $30 helmet.
#2252
Cycle Year Round
In one aspect the $200 helmet is safer than the $30 helmet in that it does not completely cook your head on a century ride.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#2253
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2254
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Actually, probably less safe. The extra vents may increase rotational injury... it's those super freakin' hot skate-helmets that conform to the shape of the skull so well and that have few vents to "catch" on surface area that seem to be somewhat more effective. Yet, for people so concerned about safety and seemingly willing to do anything "even if there is a 1% chance it will help", we don't see those around more. Funny, that.
#2255
Cycle Year Round
Actually, probably less safe. The extra vents may increase rotational injury... it's those super freakin' hot skate-helmets that conform to the shape of the skull so well and that have few vents to "catch" on surface area that seem to be somewhat more effective. Yet, for people so concerned about safety and seemingly willing to do anything "even if there is a 1% chance it will help", we don't see those around more. Funny, that.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#2256
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
I also notice that the anti helmet clik is very prone to name calling anyone that doesnt agree with them.
#2257
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
- "The chance of your dying in a car-less spill is about 10,000,000 to 1"
- "From the description of your helmet, the shell failed and so liner compression didn't occur, so it failed to have an beneficial effect."
- "You were hit by an SUV and took a concussion; no, the helmet didn't even POSSIBLY mitigate that down from death - when helmets overload the shell fails first, so no liner compression, so benefit."
Just because you're not smart enough to understand the very basic science doesn't mean that other people aren't. You might not like it or understand how it is done, but knowledge of the basic science and statistics involved does indeed let one make reasonably authoritative ststatements about reality - indeed, this is what science is for!
Last edited by meanwhile; 05-20-12 at 08:25 AM.
#2258
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2259
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They also make shell failure more likely. It's worth remembering that a very high proportion of helmets when tested randomly fail to meet even the basic cert level they are supposed - cert testing is done with helmets that are cherrypicked by helmet makers.
#2260
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The science is THIS simple:
- Cycling helmets are designed to absorb a tiny amount of energy - a minute fraction of the amount of energy needed to create even a concussion, let alone a serious brain injury
- When they overload, the shell fails before liner compression and there is no benefit (because the liner will now split before compressing)
- They were originally designed to solve a specific problem for very young children whose skulls are relatively flexible and are likely to fall off bikes without cars being involved; they were never designed to be a safety solution for the dangers that adults face.
- Cycling helmets are designed to absorb a tiny amount of energy - a minute fraction of the amount of energy needed to create even a concussion, let alone a serious brain injury
- When they overload, the shell fails before liner compression and there is no benefit (because the liner will now split before compressing)
- They were originally designed to solve a specific problem for very young children whose skulls are relatively flexible and are likely to fall off bikes without cars being involved; they were never designed to be a safety solution for the dangers that adults face.
#2261
Senior Member
Again, this is profoundly foolish. Because you CAN look at accidents and say stuff like
- "The chance of your dying in a car-less spill is about 10,000,000 to 1"
- "From the description of your helmet, the shell failed and so liner compression didn't occur, so it failed to have an beneficial effect."
- "You were hit by an SUV and took a concussion; no, the helmet didn't even POSSIBLY mitigate that down from death - when helmets overload the shell fails first, so no liner compression, so benefit."
Just because you're not smart enough to understand the very basic science doesn't mean that other people aren't. You might not like it or understand how it is done, but knowledge of the basic science and statistics involved does indeed let one make reasonably authoritative ststatements about reality - indeed, this is what science is for!
- "The chance of your dying in a car-less spill is about 10,000,000 to 1"
- "From the description of your helmet, the shell failed and so liner compression didn't occur, so it failed to have an beneficial effect."
- "You were hit by an SUV and took a concussion; no, the helmet didn't even POSSIBLY mitigate that down from death - when helmets overload the shell fails first, so no liner compression, so benefit."
Just because you're not smart enough to understand the very basic science doesn't mean that other people aren't. You might not like it or understand how it is done, but knowledge of the basic science and statistics involved does indeed let one make reasonably authoritative ststatements about reality - indeed, this is what science is for!
- "Your chance of dying in a car-less spill is the same whether you are wearing a helmet or not."
- "From the description of your helmet, the shell failed after compression of the liner, so it may have provided some protection."
- "You were hit by an SUV and took a concussion -- did you really expect a helmet to perform better than they are supposed to? Although there is compression of the liner, so it may have provided some kind of protection before forces involved in the accident exceeded the safety spec of the helmet."
I got no problem with science; my problem is idiots like you dissembling on topics like this, using science like it's a black and white kind of thing, no shades of grey, where in fact, there's plenty of study that still needs to go down before anyone can claim anything definitively either way.
#2263
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW Texas
Posts: 1,122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Comparing helmet use in the Netherlands to the USA is like comparing apples to tomatoes. As far as I'm aware there is no other country that has the level of bicycle infrastructure nor the changed attitudes of drivers towards bicycle riders that the Netherlands has. America's car-centric attitudes make the roads more dangerous for riders, thus causing a higher rate of death and injury to cyclists.
I wear a helmet, gloves, shirt, shorts/pants, and shoes all for the protection they can afford me while on my bike. I use a headlight, taillight and reflectors for the same reason. I have no belief that a helmet will save my life in all instances, but it can help sometimes and I don't mind wearing it.
If you don't want to wear one, don't. But arguing about it here and lambasting others isn't going to change people's views about bicycling being dangerous, or the laws that have already been passed for mandatory usage. Instead, write letters stating any facts or research to those that can effect change. Let's get that infrastructure started. Let's get more cars off the roads. Let's begin to restructure so that folks in the USA can feel as safe and have things in more convenient range like folks in the Netherlands.
I wear a helmet, gloves, shirt, shorts/pants, and shoes all for the protection they can afford me while on my bike. I use a headlight, taillight and reflectors for the same reason. I have no belief that a helmet will save my life in all instances, but it can help sometimes and I don't mind wearing it.
If you don't want to wear one, don't. But arguing about it here and lambasting others isn't going to change people's views about bicycling being dangerous, or the laws that have already been passed for mandatory usage. Instead, write letters stating any facts or research to those that can effect change. Let's get that infrastructure started. Let's get more cars off the roads. Let's begin to restructure so that folks in the USA can feel as safe and have things in more convenient range like folks in the Netherlands.
#2264
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 374
Bikes: Seven Axiom S
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Don't forget your helmet boys and girls
Here's my helmet after I crashed on the way to work last week. My bike slid out from under me...I went down hard. Landed on my shoulder and head. I walked away with a sprained wrist and some road rash (and a slight headache ). Nothing major.... My helmet took the brunt of the blow. Glad I was wearing it.
#2265
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edgewater, CO
Posts: 3,213
Bikes: Tons
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is a huge thread in A&S for your helmet fear mongering.
#2266
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Utica,NY,USA
Posts: 1,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
buy a lottery ticket.
i wear a helmet as an agreement with my wife, but i realize it's only useful in certain types of crashes in certain circumstances.
glad you survived.
i wear a helmet as an agreement with my wife, but i realize it's only useful in certain types of crashes in certain circumstances.
glad you survived.
#2268
bragi
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Personally, I'm a little doubtful about the usefulness of helmets, but I wear one just the same, because in the final analysis they're safer than nothing, and your photo and story bear out the wisdom of this choice. Most people will never actually need their helmet, and a tragic few will not be helped by one, but you never can tell, and it's better to be safe and dorky than confined to a wheelchair or an urn on the mantle.
#2269
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Utica,NY,USA
Posts: 1,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2271
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Seems to me that the loud ones in the U.S. - the "letter writers" - are the "vehicular cyclists" who are clamoring to get rid of infrastructure. Apparently having separate facilities for cyclists is "dangerous".
Of course, those folks are being largely ignored, as is the grand tradition for letter-writers in these great United States.
Meanwhile, reality on the ground is that there are numerous places with lots of helmets and high fatality rates, and numerous places with few helmets and low fatality rates. Simply shouting "Infrastructure!" every time that is mentioned is a fairly obvious attempt to distract everyone from the elephant in the room.
Of course, those folks are being largely ignored, as is the grand tradition for letter-writers in these great United States.
Meanwhile, reality on the ground is that there are numerous places with lots of helmets and high fatality rates, and numerous places with few helmets and low fatality rates. Simply shouting "Infrastructure!" every time that is mentioned is a fairly obvious attempt to distract everyone from the elephant in the room.
#2272
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 78
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, fear mongering. Well, have some more:
https://www.******.com/r/bicycling/co..._car_injuries/
The fact is, we can fully recover if any body part slams into concrete at 15 mph from 6 feet up, except one.
https://www.******.com/r/bicycling/co..._car_injuries/
The fact is, we can fully recover if any body part slams into concrete at 15 mph from 6 feet up, except one.
#2273
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 708
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Apparently having separate facilities for cyclists is "dangerous".
The vast majority of of separate facilities for cyclists, in America are, indeed, dangerous, either because of flaws in design, placement, implementation and/or maintenance, and/or because they are elements of programs which serve to restrict the rights of cyclists to use the roads safely.
It is certainly possible to design and build cycling facilities that are safe and convenient, and which don't have as their primary purpose getting cyclists out of the way of motorists. But it doesn't happen very often.
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."
~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."
~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
#2274
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 78
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts