Police kill rider with taser
#151
Senior Member
Because this thread was resurrected with notice of Federal lawsuit and no news of its resolution, perhaps this thread should remain open until and unless some kind of finding is posted.
#152
Hogosha Sekai
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STS
Posts: 6,669
Bikes: Leader 725, Centurion Turbo, Scwhinn Peloton, Schwinn Premis, GT Tequesta, Bridgestone CB-2,72' Centurion Lemans, 72 Raleigh Competition
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
15 Posts
So the criminal court resolution and an open ended lawsuit stemming directly from the original incident isn't appropriate to a thread based on the original incident? Sorry man but there were a few of us who wanted to see how this whole thing ended and it is still a very important topic: the ethics of how police interact with a bicycle rider is very relevant to us all.. especially one that did nothing wrong.
Last edited by RaleighSport; 07-16-14 at 08:10 AM.
#153
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,700 Times
in
2,520 Posts
I think it's fine. I changed the thread title because it's clear that tasering cyclists is not officially sanctioned and not without its costs to the LEO involved. Certainly not enough.
#154
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,727
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,436 Posts
I'm with Rollfast here. IMO this was never a bicycle related issue, it was a straight issue about police use of force. It's only here because the victim happened to be on a bicycle. He wasn't tasered because he was on a bicycle, so the fact that he was is unrelated to the issue. Had the victim been running away, or trying to drive away this thread would never have been started.
I'm not saying that there's not serious reasons that we should debate police use of force issues, but they're not a bicycle related issue.
I'm not saying that there's not serious reasons that we should debate police use of force issues, but they're not a bicycle related issue.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#155
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, the leafy NW side
Posts: 2,479
Bikes: 1974 Motobecane Grand Record, 1987 Miyata Pro, 1988 Bob Jackson Lady Mixte (wife's), others in the family
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 155 Times
in
79 Posts
IF it was a legit issue for discussion here in the first place then sure, a follow up...follows. If people got bent out of shape, got their feelings hurt and quit BF, posted inflammatory over-the-top invective and so got banned or whatever, that's on them. Looking at the last few pages, there's only one person who is now banned, and it's not likely that was from this thread as it happens to him regularly.
BUT...FB is right. The bicycle the poor guy was riding was incidental. A busybody reporting a 'threat' that wasn't, an overeager rookie cop responding, a 'questionable' person not reacting to his command, the fact that the victim was an elderly, almost certainly poor black man (with hearing loss and possibly an odd affect) 'refusing' an order...those are IMO the more likely reasons for the use of a taser and the resulting injury and death.
BTW I got called an 'idiot' for 'playing the race card' upthread. No reason to get in a shouting match with that guy, if he's that willfully blind, that's his business.
BUT...FB is right. The bicycle the poor guy was riding was incidental. A busybody reporting a 'threat' that wasn't, an overeager rookie cop responding, a 'questionable' person not reacting to his command, the fact that the victim was an elderly, almost certainly poor black man (with hearing loss and possibly an odd affect) 'refusing' an order...those are IMO the more likely reasons for the use of a taser and the resulting injury and death.
BTW I got called an 'idiot' for 'playing the race card' upthread. No reason to get in a shouting match with that guy, if he's that willfully blind, that's his business.
__________________
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.
- Dr Samuel Johnson
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.
- Dr Samuel Johnson
Last edited by Chicago Al; 07-16-14 at 10:59 AM.
#156
Seńior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
So you believe that there's a real possibility that this man presented a real and present danger to the police officer, or that he was clearly a danger to the community and the police officer felt that using a weapon was the only way to be sure he didn't escape? And therefore using a taser was the correct action?
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#157
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
As you may have noticed, any post that states or implies that bicyclist(s) is/are victim(s) of some sort of evil activity from either motorists or uniformed law personnel (or worse-both ) is considered an A&S issue.
#158
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,727
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,436 Posts
Yes, I noticed. So I guess that when daddy took the T-bird away, that would have been fodder for a sports car forum.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#159
Senior Member
So if a cyclist gets hit by a car, it would be ridiculous to post it here since it's just a "car hitting something/someone" issue, not specifically a bicycle/bicyclist issue? Like they could just as well have been a pedestrian?
This thread is worth it: if you're gonna get tazed, get off your bike first...
This thread is worth it: if you're gonna get tazed, get off your bike first...
#160
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,727
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,436 Posts
So if a cyclist gets hit by a car, it would be ridiculous to post it here since it's just a "car hitting something/someone" issue, not specifically a bicycle/bicyclist issue? Like they could just as well have been a pedestrian?
This thread is worth it: if you're gonna get tazed, get off your bike first...
This thread is worth it: if you're gonna get tazed, get off your bike first...
Some time back we had a thread relating to a police attempt to stop a group of cyclists "obstructing traffic". I believe it happened in your neck of the woods. In any case this was a bicycle issue, since the underlying cause was how/where the cyclists were riding. If the identical thing had happened while he was attempting to apprehend a bank robber fleeing by bicycle it wouldn't be a bicycle issue.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#161
Senior Member
You have to separate the main issues from the collateral ones. Riding in traffic and getting hit by a car is a bicycle safety issue. The type of car isn't. By the same token a police use of force issue isn't a bicycle one if the fact that the victim was riding isn't related to why he was tazed.
Some time back we had a thread relating to a police attempt to stop a group of cyclists "obstructing traffic". I believe it happened in your neck of the woods. In any case this was a bicycle issue, since the underlying cause was how/where the cyclists were riding. If the identical thing had happened while he was attempting to apprehend a bank robber fleeing by bicycle it wouldn't be a bicycle issue.
Some time back we had a thread relating to a police attempt to stop a group of cyclists "obstructing traffic". I believe it happened in your neck of the woods. In any case this was a bicycle issue, since the underlying cause was how/where the cyclists were riding. If the identical thing had happened while he was attempting to apprehend a bank robber fleeing by bicycle it wouldn't be a bicycle issue.
Mainly, I'm just interested to hear if anything happens regarding the suit filed in Federal court. And yes, less about the cycling issue than the victims/heirs rights issues involved here.
BeeTeeDubs: That was Rye NH, Chief of Police trying to stop the Wed eve local "Hammerfest." Flip-side is that the Seacoast Century received approval to ride through Rye as it has in the past, despite those yahoos and the deaths on the annual ride in Hampton last year. Glad the town could tell the difference between those causing issues and other cyclists, cycling groups.
#162
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
So if a cyclist gets hit by a car, it would be ridiculous to post it here since it's just a "car hitting something/someone" issue, not specifically a bicycle/bicyclist issue? Like they could just as well have been a pedestrian?
This thread is worth it: if you're gonna get tazed, get off your bike first...
This thread is worth it: if you're gonna get tazed, get off your bike first...
#163
Hogosha Sekai
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STS
Posts: 6,669
Bikes: Leader 725, Centurion Turbo, Scwhinn Peloton, Schwinn Premis, GT Tequesta, Bridgestone CB-2,72' Centurion Lemans, 72 Raleigh Competition
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
15 Posts
This thread covers how LEO's interact with "suspects" "persons of interest" or otherwise while riding bicycles, if you do not feel that it becomes a SAFETY or ADVOCACY issue that's your opinion. Personally however I already don't like a particular element which exists within the LEO community, the same element that exists in every part of our global community too.. yes I want to know when I'm out on my bicycle whether or not an LEO can/will taze me over any sort of suspicion, yes I do consider it advocacy to push for non harmful ways to stop riders if they're suspected of something rather than being tazered and allowed to fall to the ground at whatever your personal cruising speed is. If you feel this thread has no place being discussed here there's a very simple solution, stop clicking on the thread and don't post in it. Others of us feel this is a relevant discussion and it has already passed the muster of a moderator review
#164
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
With people responding to posts that are years old this thread is becoming a bit confused. If y'all want to continue the discussion start a fresh one. At least then everyone will be on the same calendar year. Closing this thread.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1nterceptor
Advocacy & Safety
19
08-15-12 01:02 PM
Chris516
Adaptive Cycling: Handcycles, Amputee Adaptation, Visual Impairment, and Other Needs
7
12-19-11 04:10 AM
Zephyr Boy
Advocacy & Safety
20
07-20-10 08:23 AM