Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14275997)
Some observations from my ride today got me wondering about how other riders are treated by traffic when people are riding in a no passing zone and it's clear for the motorists to pass.
What's everyone's experience with traffic and solid double yellow lines? Anyone have much success preventing high speed traffic from passing in a no passing zone when the road is clear? I think part of the no passing thing is that Americans are not taught so much how to drive, but how to obey the rules... ("stay between the lines, the lines are your friend.") |
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
(Post 14281477)
But sadly as has been said before too many people ignore even the yield signs. Not even bothering to slow down in the least little bit.
|
Originally Posted by hagen2456
(Post 14280574)
Thanks for your answer. My guess is that having "too many" no passing zones will make drivers tend to ignore them. Like the "too many" stop signs I've read about here, too. I wonder what makes traffic planners implement "too many" whatever.
|
Many of the newest versions of the passing laws specifically refer to bicyclists being passed in no passing zones. All the ones I've read about, anyways.
Question : Is passing bicycles in a no-passing zone one of the amorphous "rules of the road"? |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 14280679)
In PA I see people passing Amish buggies all the time regardless of whether there's a double-yellow down the middle of the road. As far as I can tell (I'm usually there for only a few weeks each year so don't know every nuance of the local laws) it's considered a perfectly acceptable thing to do when faced with such a slow-moving vehicle.
I imagine it's either technically illegal but never enforced, or there's some threshold below which a vehicle is deemed sufficiently slow-moving that passing across a double-yellow is legal. (2) When an obstruction exists making it necessary to drive to the left of the center of the roadway, provided the driver yields the right-of-way to all vehicles traveling in the proper direction upon the unobstructed portion of the roadway within such distance as to constitute a hazard. |
Originally Posted by CB HI
(Post 14284045)
PA has similar law and handles it the same as Florida.
http://law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/v...3.001.000.html |
PA no passing zone law
§ 3307. No-passing zones. (a) Establishment and marking.--The department and local authorities may determine those portions of any highway under their respective jurisdictions where overtaking and passing or driving on the left side of the roadway would be especially hazardous and shall by appropriate signs or markings on the roadway indicate the beginning and end of such zones and when the signs or markings are in place and clearly visible to an ordinarily observant person every driver of a vehicle shall obey the directions of the signs or markings. Signs shall be placed to indicate the beginning and end of each no-passing zone. (b) Compliance by drivers.--Where signs and markings are in place to define a no-passing zone as set forth in subsection (a), no driver shall at any time drive on the left side of the roadway within the no-passing zone or on the left side of any pavement striping designed to mark a no-passing zone throughout its length. (c) Application of section.--This section does not apply under the conditions described in section 3301(a)(2) and (5) (relating to driving on right side of roadway). 3301 a. (2) When an obstruction exists making it necessary to drive to the left of the center of the roadway, provided the driver yields the right-of-way to all vehicles traveling in the proper direction upon the unobstructed portion of the roadway within such distance as to constitute a hazard. |
the part about yielding the right of way is widely ignored. It's a little scary. I have a theory that there used to be a lot more head-on accidents and people have gotten complacent
|
Originally Posted by CB HI
(Post 14284109)
PA no passing zone law
The no passing law is exempted for obstructions which SMV became legally considered. HB 171, Pennsylvania's 4 foot safe passing law, included language allowing passing of pedalcycles in no passing zones.
Originally Posted by penn four foot passing law
(b.1) Overtaking pedalcycles.‑‑It is permissible to pass a pedalcycle, if done in accordance with sections 3303(a)(3) (relating to overtaking vehicle on the left) and 3305 (relating to limitations on overtaking on the left).
It's too bad florida claims bikes can be passed as "obstructions" across double yellow lines. one of the de facto rules of the road exhibited everywhere - pass bicyclists in no passing zones if safe. Here's an example from a state that specifically allows passing bicyclists in a no passing zone, Kansas...
Originally Posted by Kansas traffic code 8-1516
The driver of a vehicle may pass a bicycle proceeding in the same direction in a no-passing zone with the duty to execute the pass only when it is safe to do so.
|
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14284307)
actually, not quite. it was illegal for motorists to pass bicyclists under that allowance until Pennsylvania added language specifically mentioning pedalcycles and passing in no passing zones. previous to which, it was technically illegal for motorists to pass a bicyclist in a no passing zone.
HB 171, Pennsylvania's 4 foot safe passing law, included language allowing passing of pedalcycles in no passing zones. states generally don't allow passing other vehicles, including bicyclists, under 'obstructing' standards in no passing zones. no passing zones are quite restrictive of road users and passing. It's too bad florida claims bikes can be passed as "obstructions" across double yellow lines. one of the de facto rules of the road exhibited everywhere - pass bicyclists in no passing zones if safe. Here's an example from a state that specifically allows passing bicyclists in a no passing zone, Kansas... So, the question remains: should motor vehicles be allowed to pass bicyclists in no passing zones if safe to do so? Should states codify this allowance as part of safe passing legislation? do these types of laws make bicycle traffic more acceptable to other road users when encountering bikes in no passing zones? |
the preferred version?
inaccurate mumbo jumbo about the 'engineering' of passing aside, :rolleyes: no passing zones are designated significantly differently than john postulates -example of a states' no passing standards should states legalize passing bicyclists in no-passing zones, similar to Kansas law?
Originally Posted by kansas traffic statute 8-1516
The driver of a vehicle may pass a bicycle proceeding in the same direction in a no-passing zone with the duty to execute the pass only when it is safe to do so.
Do you consider it a de facto rule of the road, that motorists will pass you while bicycling, even in a no passing zone if its safe to do so? Would knowing its legal to pass bicyclists in no passing zones enhance motorists' acceptance of bicyclists on the roads? I consider them positive steps in traffic law, both as recognition of a de facto rule of traffic, and the laws' legitimacy factor. (I already know bicyclists are legitimate road users, its just not all motorists think this) |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14286060)
the preferred version?
inaccurate mumbo jumbo about the 'engineering' of passing aside, :rolleyes: no passing zones are designated significantly differently than john postulates -example of a states' no passing standards snips Bek is now making his standard argument in favor of a law that allows overtaking a cyclist within a no-passing zone instead of a law that allows overtaking a similarly slow vehicle within a no-passing zone. The mere mention of "bicycle" in such a law enables Bek to claim that it represents cyclists' rights, while the more accurate "slowly moving vehicle" law, while providing equal protection for cyclists as well as matching the engineering requirements, would not allow Bek to advance a claim of cyclists' rights. Nothing but propaganda in Bek's argument. |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14284307)
So, the question remains: should motor vehicles be allowed to pass bicyclists in no passing zones if safe to do so? ? The question to me is why shouldn't they? What are the pros and cons? |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14286060)
Do motorists frequently pass you in no passing zones?
Do you consider it a de facto rule of the road, that motorists will pass you while bicycling, even in a no passing zone if its safe to do so? Would knowing its legal to pass bicyclists in no passing zones enhance motorists' acceptance of bicyclists on the roads? I consider them positive steps in traffic law, both as recognition of a de facto rule of traffic, and the laws' legitimacy factor. (I already know bicyclists are legitimate road users, its just not all motorists think this) Motorists frequently pass me despite double white lines down the middle of the road (our version of your double yellow lines). I don't have a problem with it, if the road ahead is clear there's no reason why I need to be a rolling roadblock. I expect motorists to pass me if it is safe to do so. If the posted speed limit is significantly faster than I can manage on my bike why wouldn't any motorist want to go at closer to the posted speed limit, if they could safely pass me? |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 14287171)
In the UK:
Motorists frequently pass me despite double white lines down the middle of the road (our version of your double yellow lines). I don't have a problem with it, if the road ahead is clear there's no reason why I need to be a rolling roadblock. I expect motorists to pass me if it is safe to do so. If the posted speed limit is significantly faster than I can manage on my bike why wouldn't any motorist want to go at closer to the posted speed limit, if they could safely pass me? John Forester (I think) made a comment here or on another thread about too many laws leading to motorists "checking off boxes" when they drive... |
Originally Posted by John Forester
(Post 14282701)
The decision to paint a double-yellow center line is made by considering the sight distance required to safely overtake a vehicle that is moving rather close to the speed limit. The newest versions of the overtaking law allow overtaking of very slow vehicles, despite a double-yellow line, provided that there is sufficient sight distance for the overtaking movement to be completed safely. I presume that these versions are likely to spread to more states.
Sadly, it's been my experience that too many motorists do not allow sufficient time/space for the traffic that is in the correct lane to pass/clear before they make their pass by crossing over the double-yellow line. Or at best they don't allow enough space between themselves and the bicycle that they are attempting to pass. |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 14287188)
Agreed... now if only the motorists would do this in a safe and good manner... see my post #51 above.
John Forester (I think) made a comment here or on another thread about too many laws leading to motorists "checking off boxes" when they drive... |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14284307)
actually, not quite. it was illegal for motorists to pass bicyclists under that allowance until Pennsylvania added language specifically mentioning pedalcycles and passing in no passing zones. previous to which, it was technically illegal for motorists to pass a bicyclist in a no passing zone.
So an extra law for something that was already legal. Simply adds more confusion on the meaning of the laws in totality. |
Originally Posted by CB HI
(Post 14288612)
actually, not quite. It was legal before to pass any SMV including cyclist under the obstruction exemption I cited. PA has decided to add specific law making it expressly clear that cyclist can be passed. That was done to quite objections to the 3 feet passing law.
So an extra law for something that was already legal. Simply adds more confusion on the meaning of the laws in totality. That's debatable. Most states are clear that no passing zones mean no passing. Pennsylvania may have been ambiguous like florida's, which required road users to think of bicycles not as 'road users' but as 'obstructions' when passing. A pretty sorry state of affairs. The addition to Pennsylvania law clarifies it is legal to pass the most frequently encountered slow moving vehicle in no passing zones in pennsylvania. it is a clarification in the law, and one that likely enhances acceptance of bicyclists sharing narrow two lane roads with motorists. |
Virtually all my riding in on two lane roads with double lines (rural FL panhandle). Passing zones are few and far between, but so are other vehicles on many of these roads. It would be insane for drivers not to pass across the double line. They'd often have to sit behind me for a mile or more. Every once in a while, I get a driver, usually a teen aged female, who won't cross the lines. I hate it when they do that.
|
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14288802)
snip
The addition to Pennsylvania law clarifies it is legal to pass the most frequently encountered slow moving vehicle in no passing zones in pennsylvania. it is a clarification in the law, and one that likely enhances acceptance of bicyclists sharing narrow two lane roads with motorists. |
.....statutory regulation of vehicles interacting with bikes in traffic code can aid in legitimizing bike traffic to other road users- why yes, John.
How astute of you. |
Originally Posted by Bekologist
(Post 14290003)
.....statutory regulation of vehicles interacting with bikes in traffic code can aid in legitimizing bike traffic to other road users- why yes, John.
How astute of you. |
....and some laws are preferential towards bicyclists, and treat bicyclists preferentially. Most of the 20 state safe passing laws are a good example.
I get passed by motorists across the double yellow line all the time. Maybe more states should make it legal. Sometimes states include it in safe passing legislation. There's no reason for state traffic laws need to be strictly vehicle neutral. There can be positive value and preferential treatment as a result of bike and vulnerable road user specific laws clarifying how other traffic operates around bicyclists and vulnerable road users. Sometimes bike traffic should be treated differently than the motor vehicles, both in statute and in practice. |
"is something magical about the bicycle that makes such safe and lawful."
Yes their dimensions are magical- bikes are short 6 feet narrow 2.5 feet slow 15 mph- easy to safely pass- hence the magically sensible laws allowing the double yellow pass. Bikes aren't cars. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.