Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Enraging Stories like this make me reconsider cycling

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Enraging Stories like this make me reconsider cycling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-14, 10:28 AM
  #26  
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,518

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by surgeonstone
With ladies, at least 50%.
And remember, for every ONE you see, there is another one on the other end of the line. Does that make 100% of them?
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 10:33 AM
  #27  
SuperGimp
 
TrojanHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 13,346

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 47 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
A few very close calls will having you singing a different tune.
I've had worse than close calls. I'm not advocating riding stupidly but do you agree that "It's insanely dangerous out there now."? If you do, go the bubble wrap route, it's the only safe thing to do.
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 11:46 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Go Ducks!
Posts: 1,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is why every one of us should be running a BRIGHT red blinkie, such as a Serfas Thunderbolt. Best $45 you'll ever spend. Think about it- a texting driver is still glancing up; still using their peripheral vision. These blinkers are bright; they will catch the eye of Ms. TextyPants and save your life.

The rider in the story needed to call the police immediately. $5000 bike, injuries, driver admitting fault (which will change once people start telling him to STFU).... rider screwed up there.
Long Tom is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 12:08 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,804

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5833 Post(s)
Liked 2,664 Times in 1,482 Posts
I simply reject the notion that roads these days are nearly as dangerous as some people seem to believe.

Of course there's some risk, but there's always been. Have cell phones increased it, possibly oe maybe even probably, but the actual risk level is still relatively low.

There's a big difference between being reasonably cautious and being paranoid. In the big picture, cycling on public roads is still a relatively safe activity.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 12:33 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Long Tom
This is why every one of us should be running a BRIGHT red blinkie, such as a Serfas Thunderbolt. Best $45 you'll ever spend. Think about it- a texting driver is still glancing up; still using their peripheral vision. These blinkers are bright; they will catch the eye of Ms. TextyPants and save your life.
No it won't. "Ms. TextyPants" is still gonna squash you into gutter jelly.

The rider in the story needed to call the police immediately. $5000 bike, injuries, driver admitting fault (which will change once people start telling him to STFU).... rider screwed up there.
No argument there. Jeez - might as well have set $5K on fire.
achoo is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 12:37 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 925 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
And remember, for every ONE you see, there is another one on the other end of the line. Does that make 100% of them?
Hadn't thought o that...let me think....yes!
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 12:38 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 925 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
Yeah...I can still visualize my father merging onto the freeway at rush hour steering with his elbows while lighting a smoke.

People were stupid back then too. Just only every 7 minutes or so (lifespan of a cigarette), not every 7 seconds.
Touche...
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 05:11 PM
  #33  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New England
Posts: 328

Bikes: Cannondale six-13

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked 108 Times in 24 Posts
I went out two nights ago and saw a guy riding his bike no-hands and texting. There are plenty of idiots to go around. I really worry about riding nowadays. If I meet my demise on the bike and go to that last road in the sky my wife gets $300,000 from on policy and $250,000 from another one. No surprisingly she supports my riding.
Ray9 is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 08:04 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
I used to think that females were more likely to be texting/chatting away while driving. I wondered if I was falling victim to observation bias, so my wife and I started to note the gender of the folks playing with their toys while driving. My gender bias was shown to be just that. It was pretty close to 50% for each gender.

We then set about noting the gender of the next two thousand motorists we encountered, assuming that we were riding around at about the same time of day and locations as when we were counting the toy addicts. Predictably, the gender balance of the motorists was also even.

Even though I'm sure most of the folks blaming young females for being the only drivers texting were just joking, the stereotype just didn't hold up where I live, at least it didn't three years ago.
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 08:06 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Maybe the OP should avoid going out for ice cream too: SUV rams people at ice cream shop; 1 dead, 6 hurt - SFGate
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 08:57 PM
  #36  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
Stories like this do NOT tell you anything about how many people actually text while driving, or bicycle safety rates.

E.g. the actual rates of distracted driving, and using electronic while driving, haven't actually increased since 2010.

Similarly, the numbers of bicycle fatalities has dropped over the past ~20 years. According to FARS, the number of bicycle fatalities in 1994 was 802; in 2011, it was 677. The rate has stayed consistent at 2% of all crash-related fatalities. Your friend's incident doesn't tell you anything about this, either.

It's good that we become more aware of distracted driving, and we should do more to get people to pay attention when behind the wheel. But one unfortunate incident involving someone you know (who, in turn, apparently wasn't smart enough to call the police when it happened) doesn't tell us anything at all about the behavior of the general public.
And the improvement in emergency trauma care has likely saved the lives of twice the number of victims. Thus, by 1994 normalization the current number of cyclists deaths would be at a level of 1,200 deaths.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 04-26-14, 10:38 PM
  #37  
Just a person on bike
 
daihard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,140

Bikes: 2015 Trek 1.1, 2021 Specialized Roubaix, 2022 Tern HSD S+

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
No you are not alone. Two years ago I started running a Dinotte 300+ rear flasher and a Serfas 550+ front flasher DAY AND NIGHT. I don't operate the front light on flash mode at night generally.
I keep my front light on all the time now, too, after crashing and fracturing my wrist due to an inattentive driver in the broad daylight. It might be safer to just stay home, but I love riding too much to do that.
__________________

The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
daihard is offline  
Old 04-27-14, 07:24 AM
  #38  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by TrojanHorse
I've had worse than close calls. I'm not advocating riding stupidly but do you agree that "It's insanely dangerous out there now."? If you do, go the bubble wrap route, it's the only safe thing to do.
No, it is not insanely dangerous out there... however I do feel that the potential for a clueless texting distracted motorist plowing into me on an arterial roadway has gone up significantly.... and to that end, I often seek other routes.

Frankly if I had not seen how many drivers appear to be staring at phones during their morning commutes, I might not be so concerned.... but while out walking my dog, I see far too many motorists doing something other than driving. I have however also noticed that texting doesn't appear to be such an attraction during later hours or on weekends.... it seems to be the domain of folks driving in the 7:00-8:30 AM time slot around here. That tells me that other times and other roads are more likely to be safer for cyclists.
genec is offline  
Old 04-27-14, 09:13 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
IR Baboon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bemidji, MN
Posts: 108

Bikes: Surly LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TrojanHorse
You guys should definitely stay at home in a dimly lit room and wrap yourselves in bubble wrap.
Yes, but that's for reasons totally unrelated to cycling...

Last edited by IR Baboon; 04-27-14 at 09:14 AM. Reason: Forgot the quote
IR Baboon is offline  
Old 05-06-14, 09:28 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Leastbest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: LaGrange, OH
Posts: 74

Bikes: Specialized Secteur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't think it is "insanely dangerous" out there. There is merely risk that needs to be managed. I was raised by an agoraphobic and thereby by fear. I lived in fear the first third of my life and once it was gone I started really living. I love riding and take reasonable precautions.
Leastbest is offline  
Old 05-06-14, 09:49 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Posts: 1,851

Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wow, if I saw the driver texting after he hit me because of texting, I would have grabbed his phone and thrown it out the window. Of course, I would never have accepted a ride from him in the first place. Police would have been called.
spivonious is offline  
Old 05-06-14, 10:32 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Nachoman
As a totally rough estimate, I would say that about 20% of the drivers I see on the road are messing with their cell phone.
I ride up to them and scream: "Put away the phone!".
(I love doing good deeds.)
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 05-06-14, 10:43 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by OldsCOOL
It's a dangerous world. Life is potentially fatal.
Life is 100% fatal.

It's a Beautiful World.

mconlonx is offline  
Old 05-06-14, 11:22 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by recneps345
It really is. I only ride in low traffic areas, and I can always here cars coming up on me to where I can make sure they see me. Texting has really gotten rampant out there.
Low traffic areas, as in the places where drivers figure it is safe to text?
Keith99 is offline  
Old 05-06-14, 12:13 PM
  #45  
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,029

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99
Low traffic areas, as in the places where drivers figure it is safe to text?
exactly. i see far worse driving behavior in low volume residential areas vs. faster well traveled roads where drivers actually have to pay attention at all times to avoid issue.
noisebeam is offline  
Old 05-06-14, 09:21 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,648
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99
Low traffic areas, as in the places where drivers figure it is safe to text?
Let's see. Drive in an area where I get passed by 20 cars per hour....or where I get passed by 200 cars per hour. You do the math on what is going to be more dangerous.
recneps345 is offline  
Old 05-07-14, 05:54 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
bmontgomery87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 997

Bikes: 2013 leader 721. 2015 leader 725. 2012 fuji feather

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I try my best to ride through neighborhoods or areas with lower speed limits.
When you're on a fast moving road, ride quickly, stay vigilant and hope for the best.

And when someone hits you because they're texting, and ruins your bike, call the authorities, don't ask for a ride home. People aren't going to learn unless they face some type of consequence for their actions.
bmontgomery87 is offline  
Old 05-07-14, 07:43 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
surgeon

The point you make is the absoute truth. Twenty years ago no one was talking or texting on a cell phone, and the world kept on turning.

That is why I say that cell phones should shut down when they are moving faster than 10mph. If they did, I can 100% assure anyone that the world will continue to turn just as it did before cell phones.
rydabent is offline  
Old 05-07-14, 08:21 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by recneps345
Let's see. Drive in an area where I get passed by 20 cars per hour....or where I get passed by 200 cars per hour. You do the math on what is going to be more dangerous.
It would depend on the road... if the 20 car per hour was a narrow two lane, double yellow line, and with no shoulder, and the 200 car per hour was a 4 lane with a wide shoulder, the 200 car per hour road could be proven to be the safer option.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 05-07-14, 09:12 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,648
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
It would depend on the road... if the 20 car per hour was a narrow two lane, double yellow line, and with no shoulder, and the 200 car per hour was a 4 lane with a wide shoulder, the 200 car per hour road could be proven to be the safer option.
On average, the road with 20 cars is going to be way safer than the 200. There are exceptions as you mentioned, but in my case I can assure you I am way safer on the roads I frequent that if I were to take some of the roads with hundreds of cars passing each ride.
recneps345 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.