A New Bike Lane That Could Save Lives and Make Cycling More Popular
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,952
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3796 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
798 Posts
A New Bike Lane That Could Save Lives and Make Cycling More Popular
Color me skeptical. Besides I don't like the idea of taking bikelanes past the basic concept of just giving us a little more real estate, but maybe that's just me set in my old ways of cycling.
Curious on everyone's opinion. I don't really see anything here that unique, but then again I don't spend much time looking at various bike infrastructure designs. There's also a 5-minute video on the link.
BTW, this seems to be something, for now, only in Portland, Or.
A New Bike Lane That Could Save Lives and Make Cycling More Popular | Autopia | WIRED
Curious on everyone's opinion. I don't really see anything here that unique, but then again I don't spend much time looking at various bike infrastructure designs. There's also a 5-minute video on the link.
BTW, this seems to be something, for now, only in Portland, Or.
A New Bike Lane That Could Save Lives and Make Cycling More Popular | Autopia | WIRED
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 997
Bikes: 2013 leader 721. 2015 leader 725. 2012 fuji feather
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I personally think it looks dumb. We're going to have to deal with pedestrians a lot if you use this plan. And every person who gets out of a car now is forced to walk across the bike lane to get to the sidewalk. While it may be better than getting doored, pedestrian/cyclist collisions will increase.
I'd much rather ride in traffic. This type of infrastructure is too expensive and it won't get approved in most cities. It would be much more cost effective to increase penalties to motorists who injure/kill cyclists.
I'd much rather ride in traffic. This type of infrastructure is too expensive and it won't get approved in most cities. It would be much more cost effective to increase penalties to motorists who injure/kill cyclists.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
If this garbage is implemented in the US, it will necessitate ending right-on-red (a good idea in and of itself) and the insertion of extra phases for the bikes in every signal cycle. Of course, that means we will spend lots of extra time at the intersections, and we'll still be at risk from the scofflaws who both don't observe the no right turn on red and who stop well past their limit lines.
Overall, we would do better to get to the heart of the issue: we need to enforce our existing traffic laws. With these designs, we still have all the scofflaw motorist issues, but then are shunted into narrow tracks that force us to ride at near-pedestrian speeds (negating our biggest urban advantage: we're faster than cars). No thanks.
Overall, we would do better to get to the heart of the issue: we need to enforce our existing traffic laws. With these designs, we still have all the scofflaw motorist issues, but then are shunted into narrow tracks that force us to ride at near-pedestrian speeds (negating our biggest urban advantage: we're faster than cars). No thanks.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW Arkansas, USA
Posts: 1,031
Bikes: 2015 Giant Roam 2 Hybrid
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Looks interesting but is it practical?
How many drivers are going to tear out their undercarriages on those protective islands?
It still doesn't protect from right hooks. It just puts another island they have to skirt in the street that drivers can fixate on and still not look past the hood of their car. Now it has stopped cyclists behind it.
Looks like it severely hampers auto traffic by effectively reducing the lane count.
Car and trucks are still going to block it by jumping the curb and parking closer to their destination. Then what? Ride in the (now limited) traffic lane with the cars? This will only piss off the motorists even more.
I guarantee you they will be used for parking and storing equipment and materials when service is needed for ANYTHING on the street.
Pedestrian usage from the parking lane.
Overall it LOOKS like a good idea, but will the features provide any benefit in the real world?
How many drivers are going to tear out their undercarriages on those protective islands?
It still doesn't protect from right hooks. It just puts another island they have to skirt in the street that drivers can fixate on and still not look past the hood of their car. Now it has stopped cyclists behind it.
Looks like it severely hampers auto traffic by effectively reducing the lane count.
Car and trucks are still going to block it by jumping the curb and parking closer to their destination. Then what? Ride in the (now limited) traffic lane with the cars? This will only piss off the motorists even more.
I guarantee you they will be used for parking and storing equipment and materials when service is needed for ANYTHING on the street.
Pedestrian usage from the parking lane.
Overall it LOOKS like a good idea, but will the features provide any benefit in the real world?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
This design and similar ones have been discussed quite a bit in Portland. The pros and cons I see:
Pros:
Don't get doored by drivers or cut off by cars pulling in/out of parking spot.
Less likely to be right hooked (much less likely where signals are adjusted, and somewhat less likely where intersection is not signalized).
Cons:
Get doored by passengers and blocked by people walking to parked cars. Mom unloading her baby buggy or helping grandma and her walker could block the bike lane for minutes at a time.
Hard to pass slower cyclists. Impossible to pass bike trailers, two abreast riders, weaving newbies.
Trash, leaves, snow, even rain flooding pile up in the lane. Needs special equipment to sweep.
Ride right next to pedestrians, children, dogs, etc. Worrisome at 10 mph, outright dangerous at 25 mph.
Left turns become a two-signal phase wait.
Implicitly tells drivers that cyclists don't belong on their streets.
Admittedly I've never seen one of these in action, but at this point I'm skeptical leaning to negative.
So many people who want "separated cycle infrastructure" seem to have the idea that urban cyclists shouldn't need to watch for cars or pedestrians or other hazards, but should be able to sail along as if they were on a MUP. They also seem to think all cyclists ride slowly.
I think that, in dense commercial areas where there are also a lot of pedestrians, car traffic should be calmed to 20-25 mph using posted limits, speed cameras/signs, roadway narrowing (bumpouts, center medians, etc), speed humps, signal timing, etc, and cyclists should simply ride in the same lanes as cars. On commercial, residential, or arterial streets where car speeds are >30 mph, there should be painted bike lanes alongside the parking zone, ideally nice a wide with a painted buffer to the adjacent traffic lane, and these should be on every such street instead of just a few. In quiet residential areas where car speeds are naturally 20-25 mph, I don't see the need for any special treatment.
Pros:
Don't get doored by drivers or cut off by cars pulling in/out of parking spot.
Less likely to be right hooked (much less likely where signals are adjusted, and somewhat less likely where intersection is not signalized).
Cons:
Get doored by passengers and blocked by people walking to parked cars. Mom unloading her baby buggy or helping grandma and her walker could block the bike lane for minutes at a time.
Hard to pass slower cyclists. Impossible to pass bike trailers, two abreast riders, weaving newbies.
Trash, leaves, snow, even rain flooding pile up in the lane. Needs special equipment to sweep.
Ride right next to pedestrians, children, dogs, etc. Worrisome at 10 mph, outright dangerous at 25 mph.
Left turns become a two-signal phase wait.
Implicitly tells drivers that cyclists don't belong on their streets.
Admittedly I've never seen one of these in action, but at this point I'm skeptical leaning to negative.
So many people who want "separated cycle infrastructure" seem to have the idea that urban cyclists shouldn't need to watch for cars or pedestrians or other hazards, but should be able to sail along as if they were on a MUP. They also seem to think all cyclists ride slowly.
I think that, in dense commercial areas where there are also a lot of pedestrians, car traffic should be calmed to 20-25 mph using posted limits, speed cameras/signs, roadway narrowing (bumpouts, center medians, etc), speed humps, signal timing, etc, and cyclists should simply ride in the same lanes as cars. On commercial, residential, or arterial streets where car speeds are >30 mph, there should be painted bike lanes alongside the parking zone, ideally nice a wide with a painted buffer to the adjacent traffic lane, and these should be on every such street instead of just a few. In quiet residential areas where car speeds are naturally 20-25 mph, I don't see the need for any special treatment.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Every so often someone "rediscovers" this faulty design. I can easily see pedestrian collisions, right hooks, and jams caused by bikes waiting to "turn" left.
#7
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,720 Times
in
2,537 Posts
if I understand this properly, we already have this kind of bike lane, and it's dangerous as anything I have ever seen. Moving the bike lane back from the road intersection allows motorists to turn and get up to speed by the time they see you. Closest I have ever gotten to being hit was on our bike lanes. Modern motor vehicles accelerate very quickly, it was amazing how fast the person got to me from the parallel road. I have often thought that to make things safer, they actually need to merge the separated bike lane into the roads at the intersections. Still doesn't make it safe though.
My favorite part of the intersections is that now you have to look 4 ways to cross an intersection, including behind you. I guess that's why there is a stop sign at every driveway
My favorite part of the intersections is that now you have to look 4 ways to cross an intersection, including behind you. I guess that's why there is a stop sign at every driveway
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
It's just a private citizen's vision and has not been endorsed by any organization or government entity in Portland. These facilities have not been built and there is no plan to build them.
I agree with bcarfree that the dangers of cycling (which are greatly exaggerated) are almost entirely due to poor driving skills and inattention by motorists. A great illustration of the lack of correlation between infrastructure and safety are the many cities in Japan with high mode share, very little bike-specific infrastructure, and low accident rates. Perhaps the fact that Japan has strict liability has something to do with this. (In Japan a motorist is always liable for insurance purposes when they hit a cyclist regardless of what the cyclist was doing.)
I agree with bcarfree that the dangers of cycling (which are greatly exaggerated) are almost entirely due to poor driving skills and inattention by motorists. A great illustration of the lack of correlation between infrastructure and safety are the many cities in Japan with high mode share, very little bike-specific infrastructure, and low accident rates. Perhaps the fact that Japan has strict liability has something to do with this. (In Japan a motorist is always liable for insurance purposes when they hit a cyclist regardless of what the cyclist was doing.)
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I can think of a few places that would be an improvement over present conditions, but in general I prefer normal bike lanes. Can't see how one can form an intelligent opinion without knowing where it will be.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Bike lane where cyclists remain hidden from drivers behind parked cars until they fly off the sidewalk (at least as drivers see it) at each intersection at speed.
AND it requires a lot of space.
A huge part of the danger for cyclists is not being seen, this makes it an order of magnitude worse.
This might be nice for 'pedestrians on bikes' but for anyone going faster than a brisk walk it is a recipe for disaster.
If widely implemented it will be the death of cycling as we know it, a boon only for those who are perfectly happy at 10 MPH and under.
AND it requires a lot of space.
A huge part of the danger for cyclists is not being seen, this makes it an order of magnitude worse.
This might be nice for 'pedestrians on bikes' but for anyone going faster than a brisk walk it is a recipe for disaster.
If widely implemented it will be the death of cycling as we know it, a boon only for those who are perfectly happy at 10 MPH and under.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Bike lane where cyclists remain hidden from drivers behind parked cars until they fly off the sidewalk (at least as drivers see it) at each intersection at speed.
AND it requires a lot of space.
A huge part of the danger for cyclists is not being seen, this makes it an order of magnitude worse.
This might be nice for 'pedestrians on bikes' but for anyone going faster than a brisk walk it is a recipe for disaster.
If widely implemented it will be the death of cycling as we know it, a boon only for those who are perfectly happy at 10 MPH and under.
AND it requires a lot of space.
A huge part of the danger for cyclists is not being seen, this makes it an order of magnitude worse.
This might be nice for 'pedestrians on bikes' but for anyone going faster than a brisk walk it is a recipe for disaster.
If widely implemented it will be the death of cycling as we know it, a boon only for those who are perfectly happy at 10 MPH and under.
#12
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
Color me skeptical. Besides I don't like the idea of taking bikelanes past the basic concept of just giving us a little more real estate, but maybe that's just me set in my old ways of cycling.
Curious on everyone's opinion. I don't really see anything here that unique, but then again I don't spend much time looking at various bike infrastructure designs. There's also a 5-minute video on the link.
BTW, this seems to be something, for now, only in Portland, Or.
A New Bike Lane That Could Save Lives and Make Cycling More Popular | Autopia | WIRED
Curious on everyone's opinion. I don't really see anything here that unique, but then again I don't spend much time looking at various bike infrastructure designs. There's also a 5-minute video on the link.
BTW, this seems to be something, for now, only in Portland, Or.
A New Bike Lane That Could Save Lives and Make Cycling More Popular | Autopia | WIRED
It's just begging for a long or articulated vehicle to come across the refuge, and motorists are not going to be amused about being placed behind all of this and potentially hindering the view of crossing traffic, causing right of way difficulties and the possibility of increased accidents, not only with other cars but cyclist themselves.
One vehicle that runs quickly through a light turning red and all heck is asking to happen.
The big problem is ODOT can't be counted on to engineer these things that well. Already they have mid-block crosswalk signals in strange places, and out of area drivers who have never seen one blow right through the flashing lights, making them more dangerous than just waiting to cross. I have no faith in the idea for that reason alone.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBwMRGxtZ9k
#15
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
US drivers aren't a bit like Scandinavian or European drivers.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#16
Senior Member
This is NOT a new design and was not designed by Nick Falbo as the article stated. It has been standard practice for some decades in The Netherlands, Sweden, and Finland and is becoming more common in Copenhagen, Germany and elsewhere. It is the most typical design seen in a grid of streets though is just one of numerous designs that Dutch engineers use.
This was originally documented by Mark Wagenbur @ bicycledutch.com in 2010 with an update here: Junction design in the Netherlands | BICYCLE DUTCH
This design works very well for bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. It provides less congestion for all and is safer than other alternatives.
This was originally documented by Mark Wagenbur @ bicycledutch.com in 2010 with an update here: Junction design in the Netherlands | BICYCLE DUTCH
This design works very well for bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. It provides less congestion for all and is safer than other alternatives.
Last edited by CrankyOne; 06-20-14 at 06:46 AM.
#17
Senior Member
I feel we need something here on our major intersections. All I know is the new Left Turn Lane changes are NOT bicycle friendly.
#18
Senior Member
If this garbage is implemented in the US, it will necessitate ending right-on-red (a good idea in and of itself) and the insertion of extra phases for the bikes in every signal cycle. Of course, that means we will spend lots of extra time at the intersections, and we'll still be at risk from the scofflaws who both don't observe the no right turn on red and who stop well past their limit lines.
Overall, we would do better to get to the heart of the issue: we need to enforce our existing traffic laws. With these designs, we still have all the scofflaw motorist issues, but then are shunted into narrow tracks that force us to ride at near-pedestrian speeds (negating our biggest urban advantage: we're faster than cars). No thanks.
Overall, we would do better to get to the heart of the issue: we need to enforce our existing traffic laws. With these designs, we still have all the scofflaw motorist issues, but then are shunted into narrow tracks that force us to ride at near-pedestrian speeds (negating our biggest urban advantage: we're faster than cars). No thanks.
The only time there is a special phase for bicycles is simultaneous green, when all motor traffic is stopped and bicycles may go in all directions (N, S, E, W, and both diagonals), which is exceptionally efficient. Otherwise bicycles automatically get green in the same direction as cars except when cars are allowed to turn.
#19
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13659 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I can't help but wonder if all the naysayers early on in this thread have ever ridden anywhere but on American streets?
I notice some folks have responded just above that have biked in some European cities and have claimed great success with these intersection designs.
While I can't claim to having encountered such designs, I can tell you that my experiences in Oulu, Finland were far better than the typical cycling I have done in the US over 50+ years, including, seven car free years and some 20+ years of bike commuting. Quit the armchair quarter backing folks... take a vacation in a European city with real cycling infrastructure and bike a few miles before you diss what you don't understand.
In Oulu I found a wonderful network of well designed bike paths, and a central city core that was car free. It was fantastic. In Barcelona I found unique intersections laid out in an octagon that permitted motorists to view cyclists before making turns or entering the intersection.
Here is just a tiny taste of Oulu bike paths:
BTW that is me talking, while riding and handholding an old Kodak digital cam. The motor sound you hear early on is from a car on the nearby road. The path network is well developed and took anyone riding a bike to any area of town they would want, often in a shorter route than if by driving. And yes, the paths were plowed in the winter... which is saying a lot as Oulu is near the Arctic Circle.
I was there on a work assignment and just had to rent a bike I was so enamored with the path network. It made Davis seem just like yet another "American bike ghetto." There is about 24% bike modal share in Oulu.
Even Honolulu surprised me with ample bike parking that far surpasses what we have in San Diego. (the bike lanes on the other hand left a bit to be desired.... but that is another discussion).
I notice some folks have responded just above that have biked in some European cities and have claimed great success with these intersection designs.
While I can't claim to having encountered such designs, I can tell you that my experiences in Oulu, Finland were far better than the typical cycling I have done in the US over 50+ years, including, seven car free years and some 20+ years of bike commuting. Quit the armchair quarter backing folks... take a vacation in a European city with real cycling infrastructure and bike a few miles before you diss what you don't understand.
In Oulu I found a wonderful network of well designed bike paths, and a central city core that was car free. It was fantastic. In Barcelona I found unique intersections laid out in an octagon that permitted motorists to view cyclists before making turns or entering the intersection.
Here is just a tiny taste of Oulu bike paths:
BTW that is me talking, while riding and handholding an old Kodak digital cam. The motor sound you hear early on is from a car on the nearby road. The path network is well developed and took anyone riding a bike to any area of town they would want, often in a shorter route than if by driving. And yes, the paths were plowed in the winter... which is saying a lot as Oulu is near the Arctic Circle.
I was there on a work assignment and just had to rent a bike I was so enamored with the path network. It made Davis seem just like yet another "American bike ghetto." There is about 24% bike modal share in Oulu.
Even Honolulu surprised me with ample bike parking that far surpasses what we have in San Diego. (the bike lanes on the other hand left a bit to be desired.... but that is another discussion).
Last edited by genec; 06-20-14 at 09:39 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 155
Bikes: Crossrip Elite, Bikesdirect tarck bike custom build
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Building European-style bike facilities doesn't turn a place into Europe, though. In an ideal world, yes, they would be fantastic. But this isn't an ideal world. This is America. (insert picture of eagle perched majestically in front of an American flag)
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I don't know why you think this necessitates being forced to slow down so much. Even in Amsterdam and Utrecht, both very congested with people, bicycles, and cars, I can often maintain a 18 mph pace if I'm in a hurry (most bicycle traffic though averages about 13-15 mph in urban areas like Amsterdam which is a very comfortable non sweat inducing pace).
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Also ratios matter. The first video I saw re the Netherlands showed an intersection where the bike traffic was a few feet backset to the right, but the limit line was a good 25 feet back.
That is entirely different from 15 feet out front but 15 feet to the right.
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
using barriers, flower planters, and parked cages to delineate a cycletrack is frowned upon in denmark -- for obvious reasons. (they don't call them "curb-separated cycle tracks" for nothing.)
#25
Just a person on bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,140
Bikes: 2015 Trek 1.1, 2021 Specialized Roubaix, 2022 Tern HSD S+
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
56 Posts
I'm not a fan of those "barriers," either. How do they deal with the demand for parking spots on the road in Denmark?
__________________
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)