Profits: Bikes vs Helmets ?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Profits: Bikes vs Helmets ?
I had an interesting discussion this morning about the Build It For Isabella campaign. People4Bikes is funded by bicycle mfr.'s and retailers. Obviously they want to sell more product. The question that came up is if a shop would rather sell more bikes, or fewer bikes but also helmets along with them (from a monetary standpoint, not ethical or anything else)?
EG, if the inclusion of a helmet for Isabella makes bicycling seem dangerous and thus discourages people from buying and riding bicycles. Do the profits from a helmet make up for a lost bicycle sale?
Hopefully this makes sense.
EG, if the inclusion of a helmet for Isabella makes bicycling seem dangerous and thus discourages people from buying and riding bicycles. Do the profits from a helmet make up for a lost bicycle sale?
Hopefully this makes sense.
#2
Full Member
Profit margins for accessories are typically much higher than they are for bikes. From a purely monetary standpoint, if a shop is only selling bikes, while being unsuccessful at selling accessories to go with them, then that shop is not likely to do well in terms of profit.
On the other hand, if it's merely a one-off choice between selling a bike or selling a helmet, then I'd prefer to sell the bike. The helmet alone does them no good, whereas they can ride a bike without one. My hope would be for them to come back later for accessories and maintenance due to having had a good experience with purchasing their bike from my shop.
Of course, one can debate whether the recommendation of a helmet truly discourages anyone from riding a bike because it "makes bicycling seem dangerous," but that's beside the point. Ultimately, I'll try to sell bikes and accessories together, not only for the sake of greater profit margins, but also to help improve a customer's overall cycling experience in terms of comfort, preparedness, safety, efficiency, etc.
On the other hand, if it's merely a one-off choice between selling a bike or selling a helmet, then I'd prefer to sell the bike. The helmet alone does them no good, whereas they can ride a bike without one. My hope would be for them to come back later for accessories and maintenance due to having had a good experience with purchasing their bike from my shop.
Of course, one can debate whether the recommendation of a helmet truly discourages anyone from riding a bike because it "makes bicycling seem dangerous," but that's beside the point. Ultimately, I'll try to sell bikes and accessories together, not only for the sake of greater profit margins, but also to help improve a customer's overall cycling experience in terms of comfort, preparedness, safety, efficiency, etc.
#3
Senior Member
Gross margin on a bike is about 35; for helmets 50.
Shops don't make much money on bike sales; they live on accessory sales and repairs. Helmets are only a part of accessory sales, and most riders buying a bike also purchase more than just a helmet as an accessory purchase the the time of the bike sale.
If helmets making cycling seem dangerous means less bike sales, it means less customer traffic, less bike sales, but more importantly less total accessory sales and potential future labor.
Flipside is that in many states where helmet use is optional for adults, it is still mandatory for kids.
Shops don't make much money on bike sales; they live on accessory sales and repairs. Helmets are only a part of accessory sales, and most riders buying a bike also purchase more than just a helmet as an accessory purchase the the time of the bike sale.
If helmets making cycling seem dangerous means less bike sales, it means less customer traffic, less bike sales, but more importantly less total accessory sales and potential future labor.
Flipside is that in many states where helmet use is optional for adults, it is still mandatory for kids.
#4
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
But the real question - you said the same thing I was thinking:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
How do helmets make bikes seem 'dangerous' and fewer bikers; but seat-belts and airbags don't have any effect on cars or the opposite effect? Honestly, I've never been able get my head around this mismatch of reality/perception.
But the real question - you said the same thing I was thinking:
But the real question - you said the same thing I was thinking:
#6
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
Guess it depends on how old one is. When I was a kid, wearing safety gear to ride, skate, ect. was basically unheard of, but today the message seems to be "OMG, yer-gonna-die" if you don't use safety gear. Many people believe it because that's what they've been taught, and never knew it any other way.
Side note - over the weekend I saw a guy wearing my first helmet from the late-80s. Specialized version of this:
That helmet is ~25 years old. I don't have any bikes that old!
#7
Senior Member
If you wade through the pinned Helmet Thread (godz bless you if you do...), you'll find before and after studies where mandatory helmet laws were implemented -- like Australia -- where ridership drops after helmets become required by law. But this thread is dangerously close to Helmet Thread banishmentation, so if you really want to talk about stuff like that, go do it there, not in this thread...
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
How do helmets make bikes seem 'dangerous' and fewer bikers; but seat-belts and airbags don't have any effect on cars or the opposite effect? Honestly, I've never been able get my head around this mismatch of reality/perception.
But the real question - you said the same thing I was thinking:
But the real question - you said the same thing I was thinking:
At least it is clear that a proper motor vehicle grade helmet can actually afford substantial protection for motorists and is thus unlikely to generate as much heated debate as the subject does for cyclists.
#9
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
If you wade through the pinned Helmet Thread (godz bless you if you do...), you'll find before and after studies where mandatory helmet laws were implemented -- like Australia -- where ridership drops after helmets become required by law. But this thread is dangerously close to Helmet Thread banishmentation, so if you really want to talk about stuff like that, go do it there, not in this thread...
* exaggeration for humor.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
I grew up in the '70s - no seatbelts, helmets, etc. Both seatbelts and helmets came into common use in the '80s. For me, I started using seatbelts as a rule in the mid-80s and bike helmets in the late-80s.
Side note - over the weekend I saw a guy wearing my first helmet from the late-80s. Specialized version of this:
That helmet is ~25 years old. I don't have any bikes that old!
Side note - over the weekend I saw a guy wearing my first helmet from the late-80s. Specialized version of this:
That helmet is ~25 years old. I don't have any bikes that old!
#12
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
we had a '70's Nova with lap belt and shoulder belt in the headliner, never used either of them. by the '80s seatbelt worked much better and were easier to use.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,248
Bikes: This list got too long: several ‘bents, an urban utility e-bike, and a dahon D7 that my daughter has absconded with.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 363 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times
in
48 Posts
I remember some cars in the 70s' had clips in the headliner to secure the shoulder belt so it wouldn't always be dangling down, in tee way. They really never expected people to use them.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Lanovran and mconlonx, thanks for the info. I would guess that if it's a choice between selling two bikes + helmets + accessories and selling three bikes + accessories that the profits on the third bike + accessories would make up (or more than make up?) for the loss of two helmet sales?
#15
makn'a phonecall to doggy
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The blue suit.
Posts: 489
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am given to understand the profit margin regarding bicycling helmets is greater than movie theatres' popcorn--r&d included.
#16
makn'a phonecall to doggy
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The blue suit.
Posts: 489
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^ I reference the mfg/wholesale portion. The retailer does well on it also.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Gross margin on a bike is about 35; for helmets 50.
Shops don't make much money on bike sales; they live on accessory sales and repairs. Helmets are only a part of accessory sales, and most riders buying a bike also purchase more than just a helmet as an accessory purchase the the time of the bike sale.
If helmets making cycling seem dangerous means less bike sales, it means less customer traffic, less bike sales, but more importantly less total accessory sales and potential future labor.
Flipside is that in many states where helmet use is optional for adults, it is still mandatory for kids.
Shops don't make much money on bike sales; they live on accessory sales and repairs. Helmets are only a part of accessory sales, and most riders buying a bike also purchase more than just a helmet as an accessory purchase the the time of the bike sale.
If helmets making cycling seem dangerous means less bike sales, it means less customer traffic, less bike sales, but more importantly less total accessory sales and potential future labor.
Flipside is that in many states where helmet use is optional for adults, it is still mandatory for kids.
#18
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,981
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: antipodes
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Been there, fun if your not too serious about anything. I know the studies, I know it's a "reality" that people ride less when required to wear a helmet. But this doesn't match mandatory seat belt laws or the 17 airbags* required in all new cars. That's what hurts my head.
Helmets on the other hand are worn on the head, they exert weight and presence on the most sensitive and sensory part of your body. They may also be in vision, at the top of the eyeline, and they have straps tightened over the face where there is millions (billions?) of nerve cells. They subtly affect hearing and may cause other bodily sensations too. Affect can also include the perception of broader relational experiences, so the relationship bicycle helmets have to the experience of other helmets (motobike, construction, rock climbing or whatever) can be considered as modulating the affective response.
I think it would be certain that seat belts also modulate the perception of motor vehicle danger, but my guess is not as much due to their different ways they are bodily experienced.
#21
Senior Member
Lanovran and mconlonx, thanks for the info. I would guess that if it's a choice between selling two bikes + helmets + accessories and selling three bikes + accessories that the profits on the third bike + accessories would make up (or more than make up?) for the loss of two helmet sales?
I don't think this is at all a helpful or valid way to look at the situation as it ignores a whole bunch of current reality.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I don't think people consider safety all that much when selecting a sport, or sports equipment. My observation has been that adults with great hair... tend to ride bare-headed. Others tend to put something on their head. Most cyclists that wear kits [around here] seem to also wear a cycling helmet [and shoes].
I wear a helmet because my wife insists I do.... and I pick my conflicts carefully. She says I have to set a proper example for the children (grandkids?). Other than that.... I think helmets are mostly fashion statements. But I wouldn't consider riding without one.
#23
Senior Member
I would be. And I work as a production buyer. But figure in all the other costs vs. the actual material cost and plant time for manufacturing only the helmet and then the actual helmet manufacture becomes a very small percentage of the overall cost: Packaging, assembly, shipping, warehousing, misc. overhead. And then you get into distribution which adds more shipping, warehousing, and overhead, on top of distributor markup. Same thing at a shop. Once it hits shop shelves, divide retail price by 10 to get a rough idea of total manufacturing costs -- that $50 helmet probably cost the helmet manufacturer $5 fresh off the manufacturing line, without shipping.
#24
Senior Member
I would be. And I work as a production buyer. But figure in all the other costs vs. the actual material cost and plant time for manufacturing only the helmet and then the actual helmet manufacture becomes a very small percentage of the overall cost: Packaging, assembly, shipping, warehousing, misc. overhead. And then you get into distribution which adds more shipping, warehousing, and overhead, on top of distributor markup. Same thing at a shop. Once it hits shop shelves, divide retail price by 10 to get a rough idea of total manufacturing costs -- that $50 helmet probably cost the helmet manufacturer $5 fresh off the manufacturing line, without shipping.
My guestimate is based on US manufacturing and polypropylene or polyethylene manufacturing as that is what I work with. I don't do polystyrene, but it would cost less than half what EPP or EPE does.
#25
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
Just to manufacture it? About $1.50/lb or less I would guess for polystyrene. It doesn't cost any more to manufacture a $50 helmet at a bike shop than it does to manufacture a $15 helmet at Walmart.
My guestimate is based on US manufacturing and polypropylene or polyethylene manufacturing as that is what I work with. I don't do polystyrene, but it would cost less than half what EPP or EPE does.
My guestimate is based on US manufacturing and polypropylene or polyethylene manufacturing as that is what I work with. I don't do polystyrene, but it would cost less than half what EPP or EPE does.