Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

You can't have infrastructure everywhere

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

You can't have infrastructure everywhere

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-14, 02:32 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
FenderTL5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 794

Bikes: Trek 7.3FX, Diamondback Edgewood hybrid, KHS Montana

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KD5NRH
Not even necessarily there; look at how much Dallas and Fort Worth benefit from the White Rock and Trinity River trail systems. It's actually pretty difficult to parallel those by car, but they eliminate several miles of street riding for many useful routes. If there were equivalent E-W trails, one could easily turn a 15-20 mile ride to anywhere in the city into at most 2-3 miles of streets to get to a trail and then a fully separated ride on riverbank trails without any really serious elevation changes.

The trick, IMO, would be to work out a grid overlay of trails, with "squares" of a reasonably large size, (2-5 miles for a large area like that) then focus on getting proper infrastructure along that grid. After that, it becomes a much easier process of just watching where conflicts still arise and addressing those individually.
That's a great idea.
Nashville has been working on connecting the greenway system. However, the challenge here has been private property owners, some being commercial, who are unwilling to allow the city to use a portion of their land for the greenway extensions.

So we have a series of greenways that are not connected. You can ride a beautiful greenway 6-10 miles and back for recreation but not on any meaningful commute route.
FenderTL5 is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 02:46 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by auldgeunquers
This is common practice in much of Europe. Maddening to drive around in when you're not a local.
And it's intentionally maddening because european cities are often designed so that urban-center trips require one to drive to a ring road on the periphery. The whole point is to make public and active transport more convenient than driving in urban centers.

Last edited by spare_wheel; 10-10-14 at 03:00 PM.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 02:53 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
mikeybikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edgewater, CO
Posts: 3,213

Bikes: Tons

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
I disagree. Many residential streets like this can and should be converted to bike streets/greenways/bike boulevards.

*20 mph or less speed limit.
*signs/paint indicating bikes and peds have priority
*intersection improvements for pedestrians.
*speed bumps and other traffic-control devices.
*periodic diverters that eliminate through traffic.
These are all good things for streets like mentioned in the OP to help calm traffic. I think though, those types of treatments should be evaluated on a street-by-street basis.

I do think a flat 20mph speed limit unless otherwise posted would be nice instead of our standard 25mph. In fact, just lower speed limits everywhere. I don't like my city being separated by 45mph-55mph arterials.
mikeybikes is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 02:57 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FenderTL5
So we have a series of greenways that are not connected. You can ride a beautiful greenway 6-10 miles and back for recreation but not on any meaningful commute route.
We've just got the one at the moment, and it's a prime example of useless design; 1.8 miles long, and the ends are less than a mile apart. Just curves along the river through undeveloped land, parallels a street for a whole block in the middle, and then follows the river again until it ends on a dead end street just the other side of downtown. No real access to anything other than the park itself, and even that is pathetic since they stopped that end of the trail under a bridge at a small runoff ditch just outside the park. You have to dismount and lug the bike through a ~5ft wide, 3ft deep trough, then 50 yards across the grass to get to another improved surface. (Or you can cut off to a small side street and cross the state highway the bridge is for.)
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 02:59 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
And it's intentionally maddening. In fact, european cities are often designed so that urban-center car trips require one to drive to a ring road on the periphery. The whole point is to make public and active transport more convenient than motoring in urban centers!
Fine for the people that live in the urban centers, but a real hassle for anyone visiting. Ever tried to learn the bus routes in an unfamiliar area, where you don't even know the streets yet?
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 03:09 PM
  #31  
Fahrradfahrer
 
jwarner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 367

Bikes: n+1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
And it's intentionally maddening. In fact, european cities are often designed so that urban-center car trips require one to drive to a ring road on the periphery. The whole point is to make public and active transport more convenient than motoring in urban centers!

I think this is how it should be in my opinion. We, as a culture or society (in the US anyway), seem to have lost the ability to move under our own power, even when all we have to do is go a few blocks (or around the grocery judging from the number of people/ whole families I see driving around the motorized carts). This, and the associated health problems such as obesity are self-perpetuating, and (I am guessing) expand logarithmically as new generations learn from old, and children leave childhood larger and larger (once they have those lipid cells, they can only reduce their size, not get rid of them) and with poorer habits and expectations.

Imagine the cost, health, and societal benefits if we restricted movement in dense urban areas to human powered or public transportation, and started making those driving automobiles pay for the privilege of not carpooling and/or drives of less then [insert some reasonable distance] miles. Don't make driving illegal, but make other forms of transportation more attractive and practical financially and socially.

Just my opinion, and I realize this would take some time and big paradigm shift across the board, but you know how to eat an elephant don't you? One bite at a time.
jwarner is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 04:48 PM
  #32  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by KD5NRH
Not even necessarily there; look at how much Dallas and Fort Worth benefit from the White Rock and Trinity River trail systems. It's actually pretty difficult to parallel those by car, but they eliminate several miles of street riding for many useful routes. If there were equivalent E-W trails, one could easily turn a 15-20 mile ride to anywhere in the city into at most 2-3 miles of streets to get to a trail and then a fully separated ride on riverbank trails without any really serious elevation changes.

The trick, IMO, would be to work out a grid overlay of trails, with "squares" of a reasonably large size, (2-5 miles for a large area like that) then focus on getting proper infrastructure along that grid. After that, it becomes a much easier process of just watching where conflicts still arise and addressing those individually.
Wait a minute... it sounds as if you are proposing a bicycle freeway... heavens, what a concept... easy connections to and from certain core areas of town from which one can then take surface streets to finish a journey. OMG, whatever will they think of next.

/sarcasm off.

Really it is a brilliant plan. And yet it is constantly downplayed as not workable, few areas have tried it, therefore "it just can't be done." And yet this same plan works for automotive traffic.

Of course such a plan would require funding, and where ever would that come from... nah, never mind, just expand the freeways... sigh.
genec is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 05:32 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jwarner

Imagine the cost, health, and societal benefits if we restricted movement in dense urban areas to human powered or public transportation, and started making those driving automobiles pay for the privilege of not carpooling and/or drives of less then [insert some reasonable distance] miles. Don't make driving illegal, but make other forms of transportation more attractive and practical financially and socially.

Just my opinion, and I realize this would take some time and big paradigm shift across the board, but you know how to eat an elephant don't you? One bite at a time.
History has already shown us what it takes to make such sweeping changes to a society, and how it fails miserably.

Some things must evolve on their own as they are now, we just need to be patient.
kickstart is offline  
Old 10-10-14, 11:17 PM
  #34  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
History has already shown us what it takes to make such sweeping changes to a society, and how it fails miserably.

Some things must evolve on their own as they are now, we just need to be patient.
No, it doesn't fail miserably... that is the lie. Such sweeping changes to society are only difficult when there are so many ways that the paradigm shift is thwarted by huge subsidies to other less efficient means of movement... the way the automobile is currently heavily subsidized in America.
genec is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 11:35 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Of course such a plan would require funding, and where ever would that come from...
Lots of Federal matching out there for MUPs, actually. Unfortunately, my town wasted about $2M (total city+state+Fed money) to build an 8' wide sidewalk to nowhere.

Bosque river trail in Stephenville, TX, United States | MapMyWalk
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 03:39 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
Some things must evolve on their own as they are now, we just need to be patient.
Tromping around the ruins of societies that had "come to jeebus" moments is one of my hobbies. Just sayin'
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 07:07 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Wait a minute... it sounds as if you are proposing a bicycle freeway... heavens, what a concept... easy connections to and from certain core areas of town from which one can then take surface streets to finish a journey. OMG, whatever will they think of next.

/sarcasm off.

Really it is a brilliant plan. And yet it is constantly downplayed as not workable, few areas have tried it, therefore "it just can't be done." And yet this same plan works for automotive traffic.

Of course such a plan would require funding, and where ever would that come from... nah, never mind, just expand the freeways... sigh.
It's not so much the funding that stands in the way as the simple fact that it would be near-impossible to build a bike version of a freeway without negatively affecting motorist convenience. Motorist entitlement trumps all (for now).
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 10-11-14, 11:44 PM
  #38  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
It's not so much the funding that stands in the way as the simple fact that it would be near-impossible to build a bike version of a freeway without negatively affecting motorist convenience. Motorist entitlement trumps all (for now).
Really... different grade level roads, sidewalks and railways manage to do this all the time. I fail to see how this could come even close to being a terrible inconvenience to motorists.

I guess the term below grade or above grade crossing is just a falsehood?

Here is what wiki says about such things...
Advantages
Roads with grade separation generally allow traffic to move freely, with fewer interruptions, and at higher overall speeds; this is why speed limits are typically higher for grade-separated roads. In addition, less trouble between traffic movements reduces the risk for accidents.
genec is offline  
Old 10-12-14, 08:37 AM
  #39  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
Tromping around the ruins of societies that had "come to jeebus" moments is one of my hobbies. Just sayin'
Sayin' incomprehensible gobbledegook seems to be another.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-12-14, 08:48 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by KD5NRH
Lots of Federal matching out there for MUPs, actually. Unfortunately, my town wasted about $2M (total city+state+Fed money) to build an 8' wide sidewalk to nowhere.
We have a mup like that in town here. It's about 4 miles long. It's pretty useless for commuting or any kind of "serious" bike riding, but it does get a fair amount of use on weekends by walkers, dog walkers, and people tootling around on bikes, often with kids. It's more like a long skinny park rather than transportation infrastructure.

And unconnected to that, for a few blocks on Main Street downtown, we have my least favorite cycling infrastructure items, sharrows. They only serve to confuse and imply that rules of sharing the road are somehow different between roads with and without sharrows.

Last edited by Looigi; 10-12-14 at 08:58 AM.
Looigi is offline  
Old 10-12-14, 08:54 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
intransit1217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Kenosha , Wi
Posts: 1,231

Bikes: 2 Masi giramondo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
Retrofitting cycling specific infrastructure to residential neighborhoods like this is not very practical and politically impossible.

But USA is both growing and maintaining existing roads. Where new neighborhoods are growing, cycling infrastructure could be included and might prompt, or developers might be coerced to pay for, development of cycling infrastructure to connect new construction with existing cyclepaths, or as a much weaker solution, painted bike lanes. When existing roads are maintained and re-paved, it's a perfect opportunity to widen and include addition or augmentation of cycling infrastructure. Much along the Complete Streets model.

All that's needed is the will to do it, and unfortunately, where cyclists who use roads are a minority, the will is just not there. Change minds and the streets will follow.
This.

Highway H, not far from me has been recently repaved, and maybe widened just a touch. Outside of the white line is marked for bikes now. And they painted channels between the turn lanes and thru lanes at the intersections. H is a two lane 45 zone. I should write to the city and thank them.
intransit1217 is offline  
Old 10-12-14, 11:20 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Sayin' incomprehensible gobbledegook seems to be another.
Au contraire -- there has been incredible progress in deciphering mayan hieroglyphs. Diamond's "Collapse" is a good introduction to what happens to societies that develop the collective denial evident in this comment thread.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 10-12-14, 11:22 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
Motorist entitlement trumps all (for now).
Oil prices gyrate in the short term but the trend is up, up, and away.

spare_wheel is offline  
Old 10-12-14, 02:25 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,543 Posts
Originally Posted by Looigi
snip

And unconnected to that, for a few blocks on Main Street downtown, we have my least favorite cycling infrastructure items, sharrows. They only serve to confuse and imply that rules of sharing the road are somehow different between roads with and without sharrows.
+1
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shiloh253
Commuting
55
06-03-15 10:13 AM
gerv
Living Car Free
6
01-11-14 10:42 PM
cpt. Howdy
Commuting
57
02-20-11 03:52 PM
JeremyLC
Commuting
29
02-09-11 09:50 AM
vol
Northeast
5
12-19-10 09:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.