Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.
View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll

The Helmet Thread 2

Reply

Old 02-09-19, 10:08 PM
  #2776  
downhillmaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 411
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Cyclists (like everybody else) make all sorts of statements about ideas/opinions they believe to be true.

BF posters make all sorts of statements about ideas/opinions they believe to be true.

A lot of the opinions held to be alleged "facts" ARE nonsense no matter how passionately held the belief in their objective reality.

Any BF thread on the subject of Bicycle Helmet Safety, especially when it includes heated rhetoric and specious arguments about their alleged effectiveness in risk reduction, will provide ample evidence of this sort of nonsense.
Cool story bro.
Way to completely miss the point. It only takes one.
You keep believing that every single person is clueless or lying about their own experience though 👍

Last edited by downhillmaster; 02-10-19 at 03:43 AM.
downhillmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-19, 11:17 PM
  #2777  
79pmooney
A Roadie Forever
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,308

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1388 Post(s)
I know I am just one data point but I would not be posting here if not for a helmet. (I don't know that I would had died. I might have survived in vegetative state.)

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-19, 11:30 PM
  #2778  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 10,674

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4970 Post(s)
People refuse to understand, then realize they don't understand, then claim that no one else makes sense ... because if everyone else was making sense, those people would understand.

No one is saying that is certain cases helmets cannot prevent some injuries.

Same with knee- and elbow pads.

In fact, people could cycle in hockey pants, and have significant hip protection ... and football shoulder pads to more collarbone protection.

In fact, people could cycle on stationary trainers in their garages .....

So let's make staying in the garage mandatory.

In the case of @79pmooney though ..... if he was in a wheelchair he might post more, and I find his posts most insightful and intelligent.
Maelochs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 12:37 AM
  #2779  
Stadjer
Senior Member
 
Stadjer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,060

Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1880 Post(s)
when I get on a bike, I don’t really have full control over whether I crash or not
So he doesn't know how to ride a bike and he shows no interest in doing proper science. Just another zealot.
Stadjer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 03:42 AM
  #2780  
downhillmaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 411
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Originally Posted by 79pmooney View Post
I know I am just one data point but I would not be posting here if not for a helmet. (I don't know that I would had died. I might have survived in vegetative state.)

Ben
According to some you have no clue what you are talking about.
Snap out of your objective reality man
downhillmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 03:51 AM
  #2781  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Maelochs View Post
People refuse to understand, then realize they don't understand, then claim that no one else makes sense ... because if everyone else was making sense, those people would understand.

No one is saying that is certain cases helmets cannot prevent some injuries.

Same with knee- and elbow pads.

In fact, people could cycle in hockey pants, and have significant hip protection ... and football shoulder pads to more collarbone protection.

In fact, people could cycle on stationary trainers in their garages .....

So let's make staying in the garage mandatory.

In the case of @79pmooney though ..... if he was in a wheelchair he might post more, and I find his posts most insightful and intelligent.
You have to wonder, don't you. I'm sure this post is meant to be humorous, up to the last line, anyway, which borders on the offensive..
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 07:17 AM
  #2782  
jon c. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 3,557
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 891 Post(s)
Riding with a helmet is safer than riding without one. No one can honestly dispute that. If you choose to ride without one, I have no problem with that. But all the rhetoric in the world about extraneous items like knee pads doesn't change the reality that it is safer to ride with a helmet than without one.
jon c. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 10:51 AM
  #2783  
Stadjer
Senior Member
 
Stadjer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,060

Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1880 Post(s)
Originally Posted by jon c. View Post
Riding with a helmet is safer than riding without one. No one can honestly dispute that.
Yes, I can.
If you choose to ride without one, I have no problem with that. But all the rhetoric in the world about extraneous items like knee pads doesn't change the reality that it is safer to ride with a helmet than without one.
Actually, there's a very strong correlation between helmet wearing and danger for the cyclist. It's not causation and it has probably more to do with other factors, but the numbers simply don't support the claim that a helmet makes cycling safer.
Stadjer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 11:05 AM
  #2784  
parkbrav
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 117
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Stadjer View Post
Yes, I can.
Actually, there's a very strong correlation between helmet wearing and danger for the cyclist
Look at the vignette from my friend's excursion to mountain bike in China without a helmet. If you're set on doing risky things, you're going to do them whether or not you're wearing a helmet. I think my story sets out another point, which is if given the choice to act safely, some people are going to choose to make the decision to act unsafely and endanger themselves
parkbrav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 11:05 AM
  #2785  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
And the references for your second point?
-
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 11:24 AM
  #2786  
Stadjer
Senior Member
 
Stadjer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,060

Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1880 Post(s)
Originally Posted by parkbrav View Post
Look at the vignette from my friend's excursion to mountain bike in China without a helmet. If you're set on doing risky things, you're going to do them whether or not you're wearing a helmet. I think my story sets out another point, which is if given the choice to act safely, some people are going to choose to make the decision to act unsafely and endanger themselves
There are studies that suggest wearing helmets make people act more unsafely, but that's not really what I mean. My viewpoint is that cycling itself isn't dangerous and safe to the point that a helmet has no advantage. The merit of a helmet comes with added danger, like cycling for sport or cycling in dangerous environments. If that's the only cycling you do you might as well wear a helmet everytime you go cycling. But let's not forget about the possibility, or dream for some, to cycle somewhere in someway that a helmet isn't of any use.
Stadjer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 01:05 PM
  #2787  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 6,665

Bikes: Surly LHT, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 917 Post(s)
Originally Posted by jon c. View Post
Riding with a helmet is safer than riding without one. No one can honestly dispute that.
Well...this IS A&S where anything can be disputed.

A helmet only increases your safety IF you hit your head just right. And the helmet makes your head substantially LARGER, so you are more likely to make contact with an object than with your bare head. How many head injuries could have been avoided if the head had not made contact with the ground without the helmet?

There are many people who will not ride a bicycle if they are forced to wear headgear. <-- This will certainly makes them safer from a cycling head injury, and can not be disputed!
JoeyBike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 01:20 PM
  #2788  
cb400bill
Administrator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 15,989

Bikes: Fuji SL 2.1 (carbon fiber), Pinarello Stelvio (steel), Cannondale Synapse (aluminum)

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Another helmet thread merged into Helmet Thread 2.
cb400bill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 01:29 PM
  #2789  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
Originally Posted by JoeyBike View Post
Well...this IS A&S where anything can be disputed.

A helmet only increases your safety IF you hit your head just right. And the helmet makes your head substantially LARGER, so you are more likely to make contact with an object than with your bare head. How many head injuries could have been avoided if the head had not made contact with the ground without the helmet?
To answer your last question, < .001%. You, surely, must see that helmets provide 1 or 2% max extra thickness, so a helmet that hits the ground at, say 8 kph, is going to provide lots of protection, whereas it would have to hit it at, say, .0001 kph to avoid any damage? I'm assuming the head is decelerating at a good rate, by the way, with which most experts would argue. In either case, the downward force is not going to cease in the 1 - 2 cm protection the helmet provides.

I don't understand what you mean by your second sentence. You need to provide proof for that sentence with evidence, which, frankly, you'll be pushing to find.
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 01:39 PM
  #2790  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 6,665

Bikes: Surly LHT, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 917 Post(s)
Originally Posted by avole View Post
I don't understand what you mean by your second sentence. You need to provide proof for that sentence with evidence, which, frankly, you'll be pushing to find.
If a person refuses to ride a bicycle under a mandatory helmet law, then they are 100% safe from a cycling head injury because they are not riding a bike. This use of a helmet, I agree, will do a fine job of preventing head injuries for those persons who give up cycling rather than wear a helmet.

No study is required as proof. Don't ride a bike and you won't get hurt doing it.

Last edited by JoeyBike; 02-10-19 at 01:53 PM.
JoeyBike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 01:40 PM
  #2791  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
Not sure about this

Originally Posted by cb400bill View Post
Another helmet thread merged into Helmet Thread 2.
While I understand why, I'm not sure about this, as I suspect certain people will dismiss the entire thread as more nanny cyclist rubbish, or simply not bother to read it.

Perhaps it would be better to have basic safety thread, which includes the advisability of using helmets, even if it is a legal requirement or not. After all, this forum is a successful one read by many enthusiasts throughout the world, so has a widespread influence, and with that, as I'm sure you are more than aware great responsibility.
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 02:16 PM
  #2792  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
Originally Posted by JoeyBike View Post
If a person refuses to ride a bicycle under a mandatory helmet law, then they are 100% safe from a cycling head injury because they are not riding a bike. This use of a helmet, I agree, will do a fine job of preventing head injuries for those persons who give up cycling rather than wear a helmet.
?? Where did mandatory law come into it? You didn't mention it your earlier post. I'm also not convinced by your analogy - lots of people refuse to obey mandatory helmet laws, and they ARE riding bikes. In fact, how would you know they'd refused to ride a bicycle: they were wearing clips vélo jaunes in protest??

By the way, I rode 1,8 km in Bangkok to the start of the airport cycle track at dusk. I would never advise this, but to go back meant going the same way as rush hour traffic, so I judged it safer to continue, and walked a lot of the way. At the track they refused me entry as I'had no helmet, but lent me one, as they also did the the access device, as I had no money either, and I was off. Lots of people on the track, visitors, locals, all kinds of bikes. I have to say the helmet and the access device gave me a great sense of reassurance, as did the friendly nature of all those organisers and participants. One example, but thoughts of safety in foreign countries with unknown attitudes of other road users can sometimes concern the innocent tourist.
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 02:46 PM
  #2793  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 6,665

Bikes: Surly LHT, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 917 Post(s)
Originally Posted by avole View Post
?? Where did mandatory law come into it?
The OP of the latest thread (now merged with "The Helmet" thread) stated:Cycle helmet safety - recent study concludes they're a must.


This is where I got the mandatory idea, from the OP headline that suggested such.
JoeyBike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 02:58 PM
  #2794  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
Fair enough, though that title, while not incorrect, was meant to bring attention to the report - I hadn't been aware there is a history of contentious bike helmet threads on this forum. They are compulsory in many countries now, not just my ex home countries, and I can see no reason why not. As noted, I've occasionally forgotten mine, but have always been aware of the consequences.
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 05:02 PM
  #2795  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 27,384

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Originally Posted by avole View Post
While I understand why, I'm not sure about this, as I suspect certain people will dismiss the entire thread as more nanny cyclist rubbish, or simply not bother to read it.
Some might read posts from certain posters that have the similar tone as your recent posts on the subject who are also as sure of the correctness of their message, and dismiss those certain posters as helmet proselytizing nannies.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-19, 08:02 PM
  #2796  
Gresp15C
Senior Member
 
Gresp15C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,437
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Stadjer View Post
There are studies that suggest wearing helmets make people act more unsafely, but that's not really what I mean. My viewpoint is that cycling itself isn't dangerous and safe to the point that a helmet has no advantage. The merit of a helmet comes with added danger, like cycling for sport or cycling in dangerous environments. If that's the only cycling you do you might as well wear a helmet everytime you go cycling. But let's not forget about the possibility, or dream for some, to cycle somewhere in someway that a helmet isn't of any use.
... such as the United States.

I certainly dream of a day when I don't need a helmet.

My own view is that "studies" are not going to settle this matter anytime soon. Look up "replication crisis" in the behavioral sciences. Car safety involves far more vehicles and miles of travel, making it more amenable to scientific study, and still it's difficult. Also, the insurance companies have a vested interest in gathering good data for cars. Cycling will always be rare enough in the US that it won't rise to the level of being a public health issue. We have bigger fish to fry. Driving a car is more dangerous than it should be.

In the absence of convincing studies, the next best thing for me is just to use my own common sense. Naturally I can't force that on anybody else.
Gresp15C is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 05:05 AM
  #2797  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 20,653
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7480 Post(s)
Originally Posted by avole View Post
What does this mean?
Was I right or was I right?
indyfabz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 06:00 AM
  #2798  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
Originally Posted by indyfabz View Post
Was I right or was I right?
As they said in earlier times, I doff my hat to you, sir
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 10:11 AM
  #2799  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 14,212

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Originally Posted by avole View Post
To answer your last question, < .001%. You, surely, must see that helmets provide 1 or 2% max extra thickness, so a helmet that hits the ground at, say 8 kph, is going to provide lots of protection, whereas it would have to hit it at, say, .0001 kph to avoid any damage? I'm assuming the head is decelerating at a good rate, by the way, with which most experts would argue. In either case, the downward force is not going to cease in the 1 - 2 cm protection the helmet provides....
Well ... the helmet is 1 or 2 inches extra thickness, not 1-2%, and the nominal reason that a helmet protects against TBI is that when that thickness crushes the impulse is spread out over time. Which presents lower force to your skull. This does result in lower risk of traumatic brain injury, but of course does not prevent it.

It isn't really known whether the extra thickness increases the chance of banging your head, though you'd expect that to be the case. Secondly, it's also not known for certain but generally accepted that it's rotational forces that results in more of the TBI injuries than linear impact. The extra thickness (presenting a longer lever against the ground) may actually exacerbate that risk, but that also lacks supporting data.

Originally Posted by avole View Post
You have to wonder, don't you. I'm sure this post is meant to be humorous, ....
He is making a logical point, a pretty good one actually.
wphamilton is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 11:04 AM
  #2800  
avole
Logic free zone
 
avole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,024

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 585 Post(s)
WPH Have you heard the expression "if you have nothing to say, don't say anything"?
avole is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service