Are you carefully dodging my question, or am I not understanding you correctly? If someone decides not to wear a helmet based on his/her judgment, I believe it is his/her call, not any others'. Do you agree? [Yes/No] (To be clear, please assume an MHL isn't in place.)

I don't ask myself these not questions.

Should I not go to Alabama today? Yes, I should not go to Alabama today.
Should I not go to Alaska today? Yes, I should not go to Alaska today.
Should I not go to Alberta today? Yes, I should not go to Alberta today.
Should I not go to Arizona today? Yes, I should not go to Arizona today.
Should I not go to British Columbia today? No, I should go to British Columbia today.
Should I not got to California today? Yes, I should not go to California today.
....

Obviously you ask yourself these questions. I don't waste much time not answering these not questions.

-mr. bill

This is not one of those "not" questions. Let me write it here again for your convenience. :)

I believe the decision (not) to wear a helmet should be up to the individual cyclist. Do you agree? [Yes/No] (To be clear, please assume an MHL isn't in place.)

One of your problems is that you change statements like "I don't take risks on the bike so don't have a significant risk of crashing and landing on my head" into statements like "you argue that you are fantastic bike handlers an the ultimate safe riders".

In case you were wondering why no one takes your stuff seriously here.

This is a thread about helmets. If you want to talk about clipless pedals you should go start a thread about them.

I haven't crashed a road bike in more than two decades. And I've never landed on my head. Frankly, I feel kind of bad for people who think crashing is inevitable.

I'm not sure he's even wondering about that... :D

You're almost certainly right.

But then, you thought you were going to get a straight answer from Mr. Don't Blame Me I'm From Massachusetts, so I guess we're both a little naïve, hmm? :lol:

And I've had only 2 crashes in 40+ years. But I had those two crashes, and you had yours -- albeit over 20 years ago. They happen sometimes, even if rarely.

They happened to me because I was racing. I suspect that any kind of mass-start racing makes crashing inevitable. And I suspect that many other kinds of bike riding also makes crashing inevitable. For me, it's off-road riding. Between the nature of the thing and the fact that I kind of suck at it, I fall. And because I fall, I wear my helmet.

But on the road, after I quit racing I switched to relatively upright randonneuring bikes with stable handling and wide tires, and I take absolutely no chances at all. While I admit to the possibility of crashing that bike in those circumstances, it strikes me as pretty unlikely, and history so far bears this out.

So "inevitable" - as in "If you ride a bike you will eventually crash" - will always seem a very sad testament, to me.

:roflmao2:

I didn't know you were a racer - - Some day I need to pick your mind, and get to know you better :) Which is one of the reasons I would never race lol True, true -- May have been a poor choice of words on my part. Nevertheless, not many riders have your experience and ride with your level of expertise and safety.

I would like to point out something to the worlds greatest cyclist and anti helmet crowd. Let be give you some advice I have learned in my 76+ years of life. You claim you alway ride safe, and will never crash.

NEVER say never, and NEVER say always. The fickle finger of fate has a way of goosing you when you least expect it. :)

As a reply to both of the above, I'll mention that I don't consider myself any kind of magician on the bike. I'm merely competent, at least on a road bike, and that doesn't seem like a unattainable standard. I also have never claimed that I will "never" crash. I have merely claimed that I am pretty unlikely to, and even if I do, I am very unlikely to strike my head. Again, this is claimed on decades of experience.

It is akin to claiming that I do not need a helmet while walking, because even though some people do fall and strike their heads while walking, it has never happened to me and is pretty unlikely to in the foreseeable future. That does not make me some kind of incredibly talented walker...

:rolleyes:

Complaining about typos? Really?

You aren't making any sense with the other stuff either.

And the "ragequit" nonsense is still a fantasy (the point you are ignoring).

If you bought the bike new, see what the shop has for helmets and what they recommend. If it's a recent new bike purchase, see if they will grant you some kind of accessories discount if one was not offered in the first place. The same place which sold you a Trek should also sell the Trek house brand of helments, Bontrager. The Solstice is their cheapest helmet, one size fits most; next level up is the Quantum, which comes in different sizes for better fit and style. These are more typical bike style helmets, with many vents and some angular styling.

Most shops also sell other helmet brands and even though I work in primarily a Trek shop, Bontrager no longer markets a nice skate-style/"Urban" helmet with fewer vents and a rounded shape. I used to wear a Giro Section, still in production, now wear a Surface, which looks like it has been discontinued, or replaced by their Sutton/Reverb soft brim design.

When I eventually need to replace mine, I'll also be looking into POC (Receptor and Crane models) and Bern helmets, with Bern probably getting the nod due to visors. I like visors...

You should be able to hook up lights to any of these. I gave up on a helmet mounted headlight, but my Giro Surface has a zip tie through two back holes to accommodate a blinky red taillight.

But can you say for absolute certain you wont be involved in an accident tomorrow?? Or maybe on May 3rd.

I wear one. I have always demanded that my kids wear one. Not sure how my daughter would have fared without hers at 5 when she crashed. I do not want to know. Ryan Smiths father urges any who ride to wear one The Ryan Smith Foundation

You can choose not to wear one.

I choose to wear one.

Carry on

My question to you is, why not apply the same great principle to other daily activities? Why limit it to cycling? :)

No. But neither can you, regardless of the activity. And that's the whole point, despite the fact that you'll dismiss it because this is a bicycle site: people weigh risks and benefits all the time, and come up with various solutions based upon their own data. That their solutions might not match yours does not make hem stupid, Darwin candidates, organ donors, or anything else.

I mean, sometimes I do wear a walking helmet, if I'm walking up mountains with ropes. That doesn't mean everyone should wear a walking helmet for every walk, and it doesn't mean that I'd call you names on the internet if you measure your risks of walking and decide to do it bareheaded - even though you can't say for absolute sure that you won't have a walking accident tomorrow.

Playing the numbers like some of the anti helmet posters he do, is just that playing the numbers. Remember if you flip a coin 100 times, and every time it came up heads, the odds on the next flip are still 50-50. Just because you have not had an accident for 20 years does not mean you wont have one tomorrow. Defy the odds and wear a helmet.

The intellectual laziness is astounding.

What are the odds of a sober adult riding a Townie at 12mph around the cul-de-sac having a crash AND hitting their head in such a manner that they have brain damage or die? One in a million? One in ten million? So if every time I get on my bike my odds are one in a million of cracking my skull open, perhaps I am willing to take that chance.

Now what about the professional downhill freestyle bike racer. What are his chances of brain damage or death with every competitive ride? Maybe one in a thousand? Or would it be one in ten-thousand? Certainly his chances of injury would be much greater than the Townie guy, yet if he goes 9,999 rides without busting his head open, he STILL has a one in ten-thousand chance of getting hurt on the 10,000th outing right? He is not CERTAIN to crack his skull once every 10,000 rides is he?

My cycling actually falls between those two examples and I wear a helmet 100% of the time. It's a habit and I enjoy wearing hats anyway. Given how many people play the Lotto in the USofA, I don't think most folks have a very good grasp of probability and math anyway. I doubt they think about all that before they put on their helmet, or not.

I must question the judgement of several bare-headers here (and even a few helmeteers). Not because they ride without a helmet, but because they keep trying to engage in reasonable debate with ryda. Guys, you know this is hopeless.

I'm not in a debate. I am just keeping my typing skills sharp between jobs. Mission accomplished.