Medicinal Cyclist
Quote:
Yeah, some son I turned out to be--dragging her into the 41.Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
I think you brought her into this.
Maximus
Quote:
Exactly.Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
You'd have to be pretty stupid to post your IQ on here. Hence anyone claiming a high number is lying.
And the ones not posting it, might be ashamed of how low it is. Conclusion: Everybody is stupid.
Quote:
And the ones not posting it, might be ashamed of how low it is. Conclusion: Everybody is stupid.
No, self-selection bias.Originally Posted by Gluteus
Exactly.And the ones not posting it, might be ashamed of how low it is. Conclusion: Everybody is stupid.
Have bike, will travel
None of the accumulated data provided from posters on a forum will have any integrity.
Does that answer your question?
Does that answer your question?
Banned.
Quote:
I think that's considered average. Below 100 is less than average, above is above average. I'm pretty certain that 100 is the baseline...it's all fairly arbitrary.Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
I think that is the mean.
urbanknight
Over the hill
close
- Join DateMar 2006
- LocationLos Angeles, CA
- Posts:24,587
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:2,524
-
Liked:1,356 Times in 784 Posts
Well, this is the internet, so 192.
urbanknight
Over the hill
close
- Join DateMar 2006
- LocationLos Angeles, CA
- Posts:24,587
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:2,524
-
Liked:1,356 Times in 784 Posts
Quote:
It's a secret society. Anyone in it can't tell you, so anyone who tells you is not in it Originally Posted by ARider2
Any MENSA folks here?

edit: I'm in it

Banned.
Quote:
They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
outliers on the chart could cause the mean and the average to diverge.
gmt
Quote:
incorrect.Originally Posted by tspek
They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.
I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.
Quote:
And you are a scratch golfer?Originally Posted by urbanknight
Well, this is the internet, so 192.
Banned.
Quote:
I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.
We're sort of speaking about different things. I know what a normal distribution is, what I'm saying is that when they design the test (and it's redesigned frequently as IQ tends to collectively change over time) they do so in a way that they hope the mean, mode and average is 100. If you score 100 you are considered exactly normal, no more, no less.Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
incorrect.I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.
The test doesn't look at other results to make the comparison, that's something we do. The test is flawed and so realistically the mean, mode and average are likely to be different from 100.
my iq is around 80, but I think about everything twice, so I am gonna answer 160
Quote:
Not reallyOriginally Posted by tspek
I think that's considered average. Below 100 is less than average, above is above average. I'm pretty certain that 100 is the baseline...it's all fairly arbitrary.
Quote:
Already nailedOriginally Posted by tspek
They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.
Quote:
I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.
Much closerOriginally Posted by Trumpy McGrumpy
incorrect.I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.
Being an ESE teacher I have a little practical experience. The Stanford test is set up with 100 as the baseline measure for "normal intelligence." "Normal intelligence" is considered to be any number within 2 standard deviations of 100 and the SD=15. Therefore normal intelligence is considered to be within the IQ range of 70 to 130. Above that school kids start getting recommended for Gifted programs. Below that, until recently they were considered to fall within a range of mental handicaps and before that they were labeled ********. Some psychologists still use terms like ******** but schools no longer do.
The Stanford is widely considered outdated and the current version of the WISC is preferred. Also, IQ can be assessed through performance as well. It is not an indicator of academic success.
Of course I'm contributing to a thread I should move to Foo so my performance IQ must be pretty low.

ahsposo
Artificial Member
close
- Join DateJan 2010
- LocationThe Cloud
- Posts:7,162
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:6,221
-
Liked:7,425 Times in 4,421 Posts
Standard deviation in the 41 is pretty high.





