Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

wheel building how short is too short?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

wheel building how short is too short?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-15 | 01:19 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
wheel building how short is too short?

The prowheelbuilder calculator gave me 295, I ordered 294 because this other calculator gave me 293. now, I have most of the nipples tightened pretty good, but haven't trued it yet. The measurements confirm that the distance is indeed 295, not 294. so I will have 1 mm of thread sticking out the nipples. the other thing is I'm doing 2 crosses, which consumes a little more length with the weaving pattern. also, the measurement is from spoke hole on the hub to the rim, which consumes another mm because the nipple sits on a seat on the inside of the rim. So now the rim is tightened pretty good, and I have 3 mm of threads exposed on each nipple. When I really tighten and true it, I can maybe get another mm covered, but even that's pushing it.

So what's the deal? Should I send these spokes back for 296 mm? the actual measurement from hub to rim is approx 295. my spokes are 294. the nipple sitting on the seat inside the rim takes away another mm from the spoke length.
spectastic is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 02:09 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

I don't get where you're taking the measurements, so I'll just give you the basics and let you decide.

The head is what holds against the rim, so you want good thread engagement there. The tubular section that goes through the rim is weaker than the spoke, so if the spoke doesn't reach the head, you have a weak spot. Here's a drawing that shoes right and wrong.



As a guideline, correct is 1mm shy of the top of the head, with a tolerance of 1mm or so either way.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
nipple-thread.jpg (44.4 KB, 110 views)
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 02:42 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,687
Likes: 300
Originally Posted by spectastic
.. I have 3 mm of threads exposed on each nipple.
If you have 3 mm thread showing between nipple and hub, you are lacking a lot of possible thread engagement.
I wouldn't ride such a wheel, and I would definitely not pass it on to someone else.

And along with FB, I don't think you're measuring right.

Originally Posted by spectastic
.. the nipple sitting on the seat inside the rim takes away another mm from the spoke length.
Your average double-wall rim is a little thicker than that, and then you want the spoke to continue past the rim by something like 1 mm to get good engangement with the nipple head/flange.
dabac is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 05:29 AM
  #4  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 1,903
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Originally Posted by spectastic
........ the other thing is I'm doing 2 crosses, which consumes a little more length with the weaving pattern.......... .
Compared to what?
3X takes a longer spoke, while 1X takes a shorter spoke.
IF this is a front (I assume, since you only mention 1 spoke length) try 1X. That will allow using a 3.5mm shorter spoke than 2X.

I don't understand how you can have 1mm of threads sticking OUT of the nipple AND 3 mm still showing????


BTW- When building a wheel, I run all the nipples by fingers to just cover the threads and still have "sloppy" spokes.

Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 04-07-15 at 05:32 AM.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 06:05 AM
  #5  
le mans's Avatar
Steel is real
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 772
Likes: 18
From: Australia

Bikes: Custom - Record Vortex 8 spd Nexus & Mistral Le Mans 3 spd Shimano. Giant Kronos. Raliegh Single Speed

The measurements confirm that the distance is indeed 295, not 294. so I will have 1 mm of thread sticking out the nipples. the other thing is I'm doing 2 crosses, which consumes a little more length with the weaving pattern.

if you filled in the calculator for doing a 2 cross pattern then that should be the correct length
le mans is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 08:01 AM
  #6  
Tunnelrat81's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
It sounds to me like you either incorrectly input your info into the spoke calculator, or you're lacing it wrong. Also, if you're building correctly: Aligned elbows of the heads-in spokes with somewhat slack spokes, tension relieving as you go etc., no shop is going to accept a return of those spokes because they are no longer new.

As stated above. A STARTING point with lots of slack left in the spokes is when the nipples are set at the last exposed thread all around the wheel. If you're at/near final tension with multiple threads showing, something is not right, and I also wouldn't ride the wheel.

It sounds like you calculated for radial or 1x and are building 2x. It might help if you posted the hub, rim specs and let someone here put it into the calculator for you and give you some hard feedback. Otherwise, the picture is unclear.

For now, there's no use continuing to work on it though, so I would stop everything until you figure out what went wrong. The wheel is going to need to be rebuilt no matter what. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but many people have made lacing/building mistakes in the process of learning how to build wheels, and it does eventually get easier if you do it often enough.

-Jeremy
Tunnelrat81 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 10:16 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 4
From: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

if there are still 2-3mms of threads showing once the wheel is built. the spokes are way too short. i'm surprised you could even get the last two or three spokes started by hand.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 01:41 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
here's a few pictures

https://imgur.com/RAkKBSt,8jT1CxZ,x2jdXyE
spectastic is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 01:58 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 4
From: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

ya, that's what i expected to see.

of course the proof of the pudding is in the eating... but i would be looking at spokes about 2-3mm longer, maybe more. they should just about be coming out of the TOP of the nipple when all is said and done, IMO. at least that's the way i've been doing it on the thirty or forty sets i've built over the years for my own use.

on mine i thread the nipple on, by hand, up to the end of the threads, then start using the spoke wrench. and even then i sometimes don't really need it for a couple more turns.

like i said, i would have to think getting those last couple of spokes even started must have been tough.

of course it's possible the spokes have an inordinate amount of threading, but i've never seen such a thing. if so, it would explain just about everything and may very well work out to your satisfaction. good luck.

Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 04-07-15 at 02:05 PM.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 02:03 PM
  #10  
DiabloScott's Avatar
It's MY mountain
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,184
Likes: 4,248
From: Mt.Diablo

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Originally Posted by spectastic


Yeah, that is way too short. The only exception would be if they were custom threaded and had a lot longer threaded section than standard spokes... I saw that once on a 20" wheel for an HPV
DiabloScott is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 02:10 PM
  #11  
CliffordK's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,576
Likes: 5,472
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
I always measure my own rims and hubs rather than going by the manufactures measurements.

I use the entire length of the nipple as part of my calculations, although I seem to get long spokes, so perhaps I need to add in a fudge factor for spoke stretching. Sometime I'll get my measurements exact.
CliffordK is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 02:31 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,239
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area, Calif.
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
Yeah, that is way too short. The only exception would be if they were custom threaded and had a lot longer threaded section than standard spokes...
Agreed. To be sure I'd look at the end of the nipples from the inside of the rim channel. The spoke ends should come out almost to the end of the nipple.
prathmann is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 02:47 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

As I posted very early on. The spoke should come to within 1mm of the top of the nipple. Figuring the nipple's head at about 4mm or so, that leaves 3mm thread engagement in the head. I prefer to think of from this direction, and suggest taking a paper clip and using it as a depth gauge. If the clip can stick 3mm into he nipple, then she spokes are too short.

Another way to look at i is that spokes typically have 10mm of thread. Short nipples are 12mm, so if you see one thread, showing the spoke is 3mm from the top, or already 1mm short of ideal, though probably OK. If you see 2 threads showing, that means the spoke isn't reaching the head, (refer to the picture I posted earlier) and you're dependent on the nipple to hold it together.

As they say, a chain is only as strong as the weakest link, which in this case is the thin walled brass tube that the nipple consists of, and you will get failures between the end of the spoke and nipple head.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 03:10 PM
  #14  
Tunnelrat81's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DiabloScott

Yeah, that is way too short. The only exception would be if they were custom threaded and had a lot longer threaded section than standard spokes... I saw that once on a 20" wheel for an HPV
If I had ordered spokes and they came this way...I would be sending them back even if they were the right length. That's just tacky.

*edited to add*

Are those wheelsmith spokes? That abrupt taper on the butting looks familiar.

Also, can you tell us what your other wheel parts are? That will help us get you some better info so that you can get the right ones next time.

-Jeremy

Last edited by Tunnelrat81; 04-07-15 at 03:15 PM.
Tunnelrat81 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 07:54 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

I'm having eye strain issues but from the picture it appears to me that you've laced the wheel 3-cross instead of 2-cross. I think I'm seeing one crossing before the spoke leaved the hub flange and then two more crossings. If you entered a 2-cross pattern into the computer program but laced the wheel 3-cross that would explain why the spokes are short.
Al1943 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 07:59 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Al1943
I'm having eye strain issues but from the picture it appears to me that you've laced the wheel 3-cross instead of 2-cross. If you entered a 2-cross pattern into the computer program, that would explain why the spokes are short.
Good catch. Yes it is laced 3x. If the OP relaces correctly (2x) it might come out right, or a last closer.

To the OP, when counting crosses, you have to include the one right at the hub flange where adjacent spokes go back past each other. So 3x, one right at the flange, one about an inch out, and the last one which you weave.

With 2x the first cross is usually out in sight, then the laced cross.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 08:02 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
Originally Posted by Tunnelrat81
If I had ordered spokes and they came this way...I would be sending them back even if they were the right length. That's just tacky.

*edited to add*

Are those wheelsmith spokes? That abrupt taper on the butting looks familiar.

Also, can you tell us what your other wheel parts are? That will help us get you some better info so that you can get the right ones next time.

-Jeremy
yea they're wheelsmith spokes. rim is sun cr-18, front hub is deore xt. rear hub is alfine 8 36H disk.
spectastic is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 09:29 PM
  #18  
Tunnelrat81's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by spectastic
yea they're wheelsmith spokes. rim is sun cr-18, front hub is deore xt. rear hub is alfine 8 36H disk.
Hopefully one you re-lace the wheel in 2x, you'll be in good shape. In the future though, you might consider just buiding 32h wheels in 3x anyway. Front wheels don't have to worry about drive forces, but with so many holes in the flange, more tangential spoke angle is easier for the hub flange to support. It's the same reason why radial lacing isn't recommended for 32 or 36 hole front wheels, it puts the hub flange under a very high, poorly supported force.

Please report back to use on how the rebuild goes once you have it laced 2x. It will be a good feeling to have the wheel completed, and know that you've done it right. I still remember the satisfaction my first wheel build gave me. It was and exciting process, a little stressful, and felt amazing to complete. That wheel is still going strong after many years of riding. With care in balancing spoke tension, I have no doubt you're experience will be the same.

-Jeremy
Tunnelrat81 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-15 | 10:03 PM
  #19  
Thread Starter
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
Originally Posted by Tunnelrat81
Hopefully one you re-lace the wheel in 2x, you'll be in good shape. In the future though, you might consider just buiding 32h wheels in 3x anyway. Front wheels don't have to worry about drive forces, but with so many holes in the flange, more tangential spoke angle is easier for the hub flange to support. It's the same reason why radial lacing isn't recommended for 32 or 36 hole front wheels, it puts the hub flange under a very high, poorly supported force.

Please report back to use on how the rebuild goes once you have it laced 2x. It will be a good feeling to have the wheel completed, and know that you've done it right. I still remember the satisfaction my first wheel build gave me. It was and exciting process, a little stressful, and felt amazing to complete. That wheel is still going strong after many years of riding. With care in balancing spoke tension, I have no doubt you're experience will be the same.

-Jeremy
thanks, although I was suggested to stick to 2 cross lacing on the rear because of the larger diameter of the alfine internally geared hub. I can see why, because all the weaving across a shorter distance is more stressful for the spokes.
spectastic is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-15 | 02:35 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,687
Likes: 300
Originally Posted by spectastic
.. I was suggested to stick to 2 cross lacing on the rear because of the larger diameter of the alfine internally geared hub. I can see why, because all the weaving across a shorter distance is more stressful for the spokes.
Nah, that's not it.
Too many crosses on a low flange hub leaves the shank of one spoke overlapping the head of the adjacent spoke, which makes a future spoke replacement more work w/o offering any improvement otherwise.
Once you're at tangential, past tangential doesn't make it any better.
Too many crosses on a high-flange hub and/or small rim makes the spokes (try to) sit at an angle when they meet the rim, taking a bend just outside the nipple. If bad enough -for the amount of use the wheel sees - they'll break there.
dabac is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-15 | 05:25 PM
  #21  
Thread Starter
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
Originally Posted by Al1943
I'm having eye strain issues but from the picture it appears to me that you've laced the wheel 3-cross instead of 2-cross. I think I'm seeing one crossing before the spoke leaved the hub flange and then two more crossings. If you entered a 2-cross pattern into the computer program but laced the wheel 3-cross that would explain why the spokes are short.
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Good catch. Yes it is laced 3x. If the OP relaces correctly (2x) it might come out right, or a last closer.

To the OP, when counting crosses, you have to include the one right at the hub flange where adjacent spokes go back past each other. So 3x, one right at the flange, one about an inch out, and the last one which you weave.

With 2x the first cross is usually out in sight, then the laced cross.
i didnt read the posts until now, but yes, I just realized that I laced 3 cross instead of 2 cross. I've corrected the lacing, and now have more than enough thread engagement. I'm actually bordering too long spokes as I'm tightening the thing. I had assumed that 2 cross meant 2 crosses OUTSIDE the diameter of the hub, not total crosses. now i know.
spectastic is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-15 | 05:15 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,687
Likes: 300
Originally Posted by spectastic
I'm actually bordering too long spokes as I'm tightening the thing.
It's possible to save a marginal build by slipping a washer underneath each nipple.
dabac is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-15 | 05:28 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by spectastic
I'm actually bordering too long spokes as I'm tightening the thing. .....
Originally Posted by dabac
It's possible to save a marginal build by slipping a washer underneath each nipple.
Before you get too invested, take a spare spoke and nipple and see how much overrun room you have above the top of the nipple. That will tell you whether you want to go forward as it is, or add a washer, or start fresh with shorter spokes.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-15 | 05:52 AM
  #24  
Thread Starter
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Before you get too invested, take a spare spoke and nipple and see how much overrun room you have above the top of the nipple. That will tell you whether you want to go forward as it is, or add a washer, or start fresh with shorter spokes.
I'm cutting it pretty close. I think the wheel is properly tensioned now, but I'm at the end of the thread in my spokes. I'm going to have to change out new spokes anyway for the rear wheel, so I guess I'll take these out and exchange for 1 mm shorter spokes
spectastic is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-15 | 06:56 AM
  #25  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 1,903
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Since you have a double wall rim, you can be a little long.
Typically, if you threaded the nipple ALL the way on, you would have 1-2 threads protruding past the nipple head.
As long as you have proper true & tension, you should be good. Not ideal, but........
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.