Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Stupid question about checking crankbolt tightness...

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Stupid question about checking crankbolt tightness...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-16, 05:00 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stupid question about checking crankbolt tightness...

Hello. A few days ago I replaced a square taper bottom bracket and re-installed the crankset(Exage 400lx) with a socket wrench. I got it as tight as I could and did sense that it was moving into place onto the spindle. But I'm not sure if it was tight enough.

I haven't ridden it yet because I'm paranoid about damaging to the crank arm. Because of that, I am borrowing a torque wrench from my brother.

Here's the dumb/noob question: Can I check the torque with the already tightened bolts? Or do I have to unloosen the bolt and/or take off the cranks and start anew with the torque wrench?
richeydog is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 05:04 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
With the bolt already tightened, if you have the torque wrench set at X Nm or Ft lbs, the bolt will be AT LEAST that tight, not accounting for static friction. (Which isn't that much and shouldn't throw your measurement off that much.)

So yes, you can, but the bolt could be overtightened and you wouldn't know it. Safest thing to do would be to loosen the bolt and tighten it again.
corrado33 is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 05:07 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,020

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5944 Post(s)
Liked 2,852 Times in 1,591 Posts
If the bolt is under torqued significantly and turns as you come to torque all is good.

If you come to the torque reading without the bolt moving there ate three possibilities.

1- over torqued already,
2- torqued to spec
3- under torqued, but close enough that the dry friction is enough to fool the torque wrench.

So if it it doesn't move, consider the third possibility, and loosen then properly tighten coming to the torque spec in one continuous motion.


If you're curious, you might tighten to 90% of torque spec, stop then retorque and see if the static friction is high enough to fool the torque wrench when you're 10% short.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 01-26-16, 05:14 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,847

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1174 Post(s)
Liked 936 Times in 619 Posts
If the torque wrench handle is significantly longer or shorter than your regular wrench, tighten to 85-90 % with the torque wrench. Then give a last "oomph" with your socket wrench to get a feel for the correct tightness.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 05:27 PM
  #5  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,935

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1816 Post(s)
Liked 1,309 Times in 902 Posts
I wouldn't loosen it, just to retorque. If it's over torqued, it'll just stay that way. Any possible damage is already done.

I would recheck the torque after riding. Just in case things "settled in".
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 05:39 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Ronno6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Deep South
Posts: 1,335

Bikes: Cannondale SR's and ST's from the '80's

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 46 Times in 20 Posts
Can the crank bolt be accurately re-torqued without pulling the crankarm off the spindle??
If the bolt is currently over-torqued, would the crankarm not be driven onto the spindle in excess?

Just wondering.
Ronno6 is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 05:41 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the advice.

I'm following Park Tool's recommendations for tightness. Torque Specifications and Concepts | Park Tool

It tells me the Crank bolt tightness (including spline-type cranks and square-spindle cranks) should be between 305–391 IN-LB, or 25 to 32 FT-LBs.

Is this still valid?
richeydog is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 06:05 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 276
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
With the bolt already tightened, if you have the torque wrench set at X Nm or Ft lbs, the bolt will be AT LEAST that tight, not accounting for static friction. (Which isn't that much and shouldn't throw your measurement off that much.)
Hunh, static friction is generally a huge correction between bolt tension and torque (never mind the thread pitch etc anyway.) But specified torque is specified torque, and accounts for all that, unless you've got rust or something. As for at being "at least" that tight, I don't get it. Again, the only meaningful meaning of "that tight" is torque without getting into tension, and the toque is what the wrench says it is, unless there's something wrong with the wrench. I don't know why you'd expect it to be in general more than the wrench says it is. Do all torque wrenches read low?
Flinstone is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 08:13 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: st augustine fl
Posts: 1,003

Bikes: 2017 BMC Roadmachine 01 Enve wheels, Sram red etap,Cinelli Vigorelli single speed, 2009 Cannondale Capo, 2016 trek Domane 6.9, disc and Di2, 2016 Scott Scale 710, 27.5 plus tires and boost rims

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 81 Posts
Read a bit on this subject, you want dynamic torque and not static torque. A good example is the checking of automotive or motorcycle headbolts , always back them off,one at a time, and retorque.

Without backing off first you really have no clue as to what may be holding the bolt (locktite,rust?) or is the bolt too tight? For the few seconds extra it takes to back off before torqueing it is worth it.
bykemike is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 08:24 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
I wouldn't loosen it, just to retorque. If it's over torqued, it'll just stay that way. Any possible damage is already done.

I would recheck the torque after riding. Just in case things "settled in".
My thought as well, but I tend to try to avoid over-thinking such things...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 08:36 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,160

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4236 Post(s)
Liked 3,963 Times in 2,359 Posts
Two good points here mentioned. To check torque on previously tightened fittings- slightly loosen the retighten to spec. The VERY good suggestion to check torque after an initial use or three (and use point one when doing this). I find the 'set it "right" and forget it' path to be one often with roots to trip over. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 08:39 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,004

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4875 Post(s)
Liked 4,041 Times in 2,620 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
I wouldn't loosen it, just to retorque. If it's over torqued, it'll just stay that way. Any possible damage is already done.

I would recheck the torque after riding. Just in case things "settled in".
Careful. The old gospel was that after you tightened the crank, then rode it, the crank would lever against the edge of the bolt which would shove it a tiny amount further on to the taper. (Especially if you rode hard.) So you check the torque. It's low. You tighten to spec. And ride again. Same thing. The crank wedges on further. You tighten again. And keep doping this until the crank splits at the corners of the taper and falls off. Or you have permanently enlarged the taper and weakened the crank.

I've seen cranks broken that way but never heard the story. I play it safe. Get the crank on tight and leave it until it is time to take it off or i have reason to thnk there is a problem.

Ben
79pmooney is online now  
Old 01-26-16, 09:54 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
I wouldn't loosen it, just to retorque. If it's over torqued, it'll just stay that way. Any possible damage is already done.

I would recheck the torque after riding. Just in case things "settled in".
I see.

What's the maximum torque a person could achieve with a socket wrench? The wrench in question is 6-3/4 long.
richeydog is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 10:16 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
With the bolts tight, I set the torque wrench on it at 30 ft-lbs. The left arm seemed to move a little before the wrench clicked. The right arm(drive side) didn't show noticeable movement before clicking out.

Last edited by richeydog; 01-27-16 at 12:57 PM.
richeydog is offline  
Old 01-26-16, 11:32 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,160

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4236 Post(s)
Liked 3,963 Times in 2,359 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
Careful. The old gospel was that after you tightened the crank, then rode it, the crank would lever against the edge of the bolt which would shove it a tiny amount further on to the taper. (Especially if you rode hard.) So you check the torque. It's low. You tighten to spec. And ride again. Same thing. The crank wedges on further. You tighten again. And keep doping this until the crank splits at the corners of the taper and falls off. Or you have permanently enlarged the taper and weakened the crank.

I've seen cranks broken that way but never heard the story. I play it safe. Get the crank on tight and leave it until it is time to take it off or i have reason to thnk there is a problem.

Ben
Ben- Many wrenches will take issue with your method and description. To suggest that the crank arm will lever against the retaining bolt/nut and further move up the spindle is not what some feel is really happening.

Instead as the arm is worked over the spindle with pedaling forces the arm's hole slightly opens up. There is no driving force moving it up the taper of the spindle (other then over tightening, a different force then you focus on). But this slight molding of the arm's taper to that of the spindle's causes a possible slop to develop in time. It is this opening up of the arm's fit to the spindle that causes the arm to, in time and cycles of use, fall off. At no time does the arm want to move up the spindle's taper (unless the bolt/nut is further tightened).

So the need to re torque the retaining bolt/nut is an initial bedding in follow up. Once this initial break in is done and compensated for (by the small amount of re torqueing of the retaining bolt/nut) little later maintenance is needed.

It's common for the LH arm retaining bolt/nut to need more tightening after initial use then the RH side does. By a larger amount... Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 07:53 AM
  #16  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,847

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1174 Post(s)
Liked 936 Times in 619 Posts
Originally Posted by richeydog
I see.

What's the maximum torque a person could achieve with a socket wrench? The wrench in question is 6-3/4 long.
Depends how heavy you are. Max torque is when both feet are off the ground.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 08:23 AM
  #17  
Don't make me sing!
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 1,022

Bikes: 2013 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 1986 Centurion Elite RS, Diamondback hardtail MTB, '70s Fuji Special Road Racer, 2012 Raleigh Revenio 2.0, 1992 Trek 1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
Depends how heavy you are. Max torque is when both feet are off the ground.
It depends how strong you are. I can exert far more force than my weight!
kevindsingleton is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 08:59 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flinstone
Hunh, static friction is generally a huge correction between bolt tension and torque (never mind the thread pitch etc anyway.) But specified torque is specified torque, and accounts for all that, unless you've got rust or something. As for at being "at least" that tight, I don't get it. Again, the only meaningful meaning of "that tight" is torque without getting into tension, and the toque is what the wrench says it is, unless there's something wrong with the wrench. I don't know why you'd expect it to be in general more than the wrench says it is. Do all torque wrenches read low?

It's a bike. It's close enough. Seriously. Yes the static friction will cause your torque wrench to read a bit high until you break it loose but again... I reiterate, it's a bike, it's close enough.

So, rewording my statement since you obviously didn't understand. If you set a torque wrench at 10 N*m, check an already tightened bolt, and the torque wrench indicates it's at torque. One of two things is happening. 1. The bolt is tighter than 10 N*m. 2. The bolt is almost at 10 N*m and the static friction is making the torque wrench read slightly high.

Either case it's fine. It's a bike. It's not that big of a deal.
corrado33 is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 09:13 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Morris County, NJ
Posts: 1,102

Bikes: 90's Bianchi Premio, Raleigh-framed fixed gear, Trek 3500, Centurion hybrid, Dunelt 3-spd, Trek 800

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by kevindsingleton
It depends how strong you are. I can exert far more force than my weight!
True, but only if you have something to push against. With a socket wrench, the natural way to produce maximum force is by pushing straight down on a horizontally positioned handle. In that case, the maximum force is limited by your weight. A 6-3/4" handle is about half a foot long, so a 200lb man bearing down on it is exerting slightly over 100ft/lbs of force before he lifts himself off the ground. If you need more force, you'd need a longer handle.

"Give me a fulcrum and lever long enough, and I can move the Earth." - Archimedes
habilis is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 09:29 AM
  #20  
Don't make me sing!
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 1,022

Bikes: 2013 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 1986 Centurion Elite RS, Diamondback hardtail MTB, '70s Fuji Special Road Racer, 2012 Raleigh Revenio 2.0, 1992 Trek 1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by habilis
True, but only if you have something to push against. With a socket wrench, the natural way to produce maximum force is by pushing straight down on a horizontally positioned handle. In that case, the maximum force is limited by your weight. A 6-3/4" handle is about half a foot long, so a 200lb man bearing down on it is exerting slightly over 100ft/lbs of force before he lifts himself off the ground. If you need more force, you'd need a longer handle.
Well, now, that's not entirely true. It would still take 200 lbs of force to lift a 200 lbs man, but I get what you're saying!

Originally Posted by habilis
"Give me a fulcrum and lever long enough, and I can move the Earth." - Archimedes
The Earth is already moving, Archie! Math nerds! Sheesh!
kevindsingleton is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 09:45 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Morris County, NJ
Posts: 1,102

Bikes: 90's Bianchi Premio, Raleigh-framed fixed gear, Trek 3500, Centurion hybrid, Dunelt 3-spd, Trek 800

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by kevindsingleton
Well, now, that's not entirely true. It would still take 200 lbs of force to lift a 200 lbs man, but I get what you're saying!



The Earth is already moving, Archie! Math nerds! Sheesh!
The nerd is exerting 200lbs of force on himself but only 100ft/lbs of torque on the bolt.
habilis is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:04 AM
  #22  
Don't make me sing!
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 1,022

Bikes: 2013 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 1986 Centurion Elite RS, Diamondback hardtail MTB, '70s Fuji Special Road Racer, 2012 Raleigh Revenio 2.0, 1992 Trek 1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by habilis
The nerd is exerting 200lbs of force on himself but only 100ft/lbs of torque on the bolt.
I'm not even sure that works. If he applied the 200 lbs directly to the bolt (no wrench) it's 200 lbs. Extending that reach out 6 inches doesn't reduce the force.
kevindsingleton is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:08 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kevindsingleton
Well, now, that's not entirely true. It would still take 200 lbs of force to lift a 200 lbs man, but I get what you're saying!



The Earth is already moving, Archie! Math nerds! Sheesh!
Originally Posted by habilis
The nerd is exerting 200lbs of force on himself but only 100ft/lbs of torque on the bolt.
You guys are both ignoring what happens if you jump or hop while putting pressure on the lever. I often do this to loosen lugnuts on cars. I generally have to do this when using any wrench/ratchet less than a foot. Put the socket on it, stand on the bar, then hop a bit. Works every time. (Yes, I'm a light person.)
corrado33 is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:21 AM
  #24  
Don't make me sing!
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 1,022

Bikes: 2013 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 1986 Centurion Elite RS, Diamondback hardtail MTB, '70s Fuji Special Road Racer, 2012 Raleigh Revenio 2.0, 1992 Trek 1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
You guys are both ignoring what happens if you jump or hop while putting pressure on the lever. I often do this to loosen lugnuts on cars. I generally have to do this when using any wrench/ratchet less than a foot. Put the socket on it, stand on the bar, then hop a bit. Works every time. (Yes, I'm a light person.)
That's a little too advanced for this discussion! For that, you'd probably have to measure force in metric, or Kardashian, or something!
kevindsingleton is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:22 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
andr0id's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Looking forward to OP's next thread....

What new crank should I buy?
andr0id is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.