Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Commute/Touring double

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Commute/Touring double

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-16 | 02:03 PM
  #1  
andy_p's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
From: Wales, UK

Bikes: Saracen Skyline, Stanton Switchback, Cotic SolarisMAX

Commute/Touring double

I have a commute/light touring bike, currently with a square-taper triple. I'm thinking about fitting a 48/34, 11-34 9 speed double. As far as I can tell, currently only SRAM sell a new 48-34 crankset (VIA, Apex, or S-100). These need a GXP bottom bracket. I also can't find any information on price - could anyone hazard a guess at how much all of this would cost? Also, will it fit in my existing bottom bracket?

My other option is to buy new chainrings, and source a crank. It seems that 104mm BCD 48t outer chainrings are more common, so I suppose I would have to find a MTB double crank. I currently have a square taper BB, but it would be nice to go to a hollowtech one.

I would appreciate any comments on the above - am I missing anything? Should I stick with a triple?
andy_p is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 02:11 PM
  #2  
ypsetihw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY

Bikes: s-1

what are the rings on your triple? have you considered just taking the small ring off and then getting the appropriate sized individual rings? it's easy enough to limit your derailleur, so you don't have to buy all new.

the other option is to ebay a standard 50/34 compact double in 110bcd and just swap the larger ring, although 50-48 would not make much of a difference. here's one for $30 Vuelta Montagna Compact Road Crankset Square Taper 50 34 170 or 175 New | eBay
ypsetihw is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
SRAM 48/34 rings are standard 110mm BCD and will work on any 110mm BCD crank, even a vintage 110/74 triple mounted on a short square taper spindle to make it like a double.

I personally would avoid 104mm BCD MTB cranks, as they tend to have very wide Q-factors, wider than road triples, and I really don't see a problem with running a triple besides Q-factor.
2lo8 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 02:23 PM
  #4  
dsbrantjr's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,327
Likes: 1,112
From: Roswell, GA

Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta

Don't base your decision on trying to use your old bottom bracket just find a crankset which suits you (or use your old one with new rings as suggested) and buy a BB to go with it.
dsbrantjr is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 02:26 PM
  #5  
andy_p's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
From: Wales, UK

Bikes: Saracen Skyline, Stanton Switchback, Cotic SolarisMAX

Originally Posted by ypsetihw
what are the rings on your triple? have you considered just taking the small ring off and then getting the appropriate sized individual rings? it's easy enough to limit your derailleur, so you don't have to buy all new.
I could :-) However, I don't really like the crank on there. I'm also thinking about an upgrade to Hollowtech/GXP BB.

Originally Posted by ypsetihw
the other option is to ebay a standard 50/34 compact double in 110bcd and just swap the larger ring, although 50-48 would not make much of a difference. here's one for $30 Vuelta Montagna Compact Road Crankset Square Taper 50 34 170 or 175 New | eBay


Thanks! That's a great tip.
andy_p is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 02:32 PM
  #6  
andy_p's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
From: Wales, UK

Bikes: Saracen Skyline, Stanton Switchback, Cotic SolarisMAX

Originally Posted by 2lo8
I personally would avoid 104mm BCD MTB cranks, as they tend to have very wide Q-factors, wider than road triples, and I really don't see a problem with running a triple besides Q-factor.
Thanks for the info! I don't really have much against a triple, but the marginal gains in weight, aesthetics, simplicity, set-up, and use, all add up.
andy_p is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 02:47 PM
  #7  
trailangel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 750
From: Pasadena, CA

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

You are not looking hard enough:
Cranksets - Components
https://www.compasscycle.com/shop/co...-double-crank/
trailangel is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 04:30 PM
  #8  
andy_p's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
From: Wales, UK

Bikes: Saracen Skyline, Stanton Switchback, Cotic SolarisMAX

Originally Posted by trailangel
My pockets aren't deep enough
andy_p is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 04:45 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
But they're shiny.

I'm not a huge fan of GXP. 22mm spindle, 22.2mm bearing.
2lo8 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 04:48 PM
  #10  
AnkleWork's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 105
From: Llano Estacado

Bikes: old clunker

Welcome to the Personal Shopping Service Thread. Please relax while we complete your shopping for you.
AnkleWork is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 05:19 PM
  #11  
Andy_K's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,103
Likes: 4,737
From: Beaverton, OR

Bikes: Yes

Personally, I hate 50-34 for commuting (see here if you want to see the ugly discussion). I think 46-34 is OK. My main commuter currently has 39-30 (a triple with the outer ring replaced with a bashguard).


Shimano Metrea is supposed to have a 46-32 option, but like SRAM VIA it may not see a lot of after-market offering. Who knows? It was supposed to be out by now.


If you aren't worried about Q-factor and chainline there are a lot of MTB doubles available that might work for you.


I've spent a lot of time obsessing about gearing, and have gone through periods of really wanting some kind of double to work. In general, I've concluded that I really prefer triples. Component manufacturers don't seem inclined to support me in this opinion.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-16 | 05:32 PM
  #12  
andy_p's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
From: Wales, UK

Bikes: Saracen Skyline, Stanton Switchback, Cotic SolarisMAX

Originally Posted by Andy_K
Personally, I hate 50-34 for commuting (see here if you want to see the ugly discussion). I think 46-34 is OK. My main commuter currently has 39-30 (a triple with the outer ring replaced with a bashguard).


Shimano Metrea is supposed to have a 46-32 option, but like SRAM VIA it may not see a lot of after-market offering. Who knows? It was supposed to be out by now.


If you aren't worried about Q-factor and chainline there are a lot of MTB doubles available that might work for you.


I've spent a lot of time obsessing about gearing, and have gone through periods of really wanting some kind of double to work. In general, I've concluded that I really prefer triples. Component manufacturers don't seem inclined to support me in this opinion.
Ah damnit now I'm back to square one! I happen to really like the range of speed available on the 39t. I rarely leave the 39t on my commute, which has a few lumps and a lot of starting from standing. Saying that, the outer 48t on my proposed double, along with a 11-34 cassette, would only be one gear "faster" than the existing 39t and 11-32 cassette.
andy_p is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-16 | 06:50 PM
  #13  
gomadtroll's Avatar
old and in the way
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, Alaska

Bikes: Icicle Cycles..custom touring bike, Fargo 1st gen

for nine speeds there is a 12-36 cassette, most are 11-34. so a double =34x36..this is not low enough for me for the touring part.

I prefer triple, a 24 smaller ring and a 34 rear sprocket, 24x34. 19.2 gear inches or 20 max, for those special occasions when I don't want to walk.

I use a square taper also, Phil wood bb keeps going, so hard to change.

The doubles, imho, change more than the crank rings, it means going 10sp min, the rear derailuer, chain,
, larger cog in the cassette, 42? any one. the rear derailuer,

greg
old and in the way.
gomadtroll is offline  
Reply
Old 07-25-16 | 07:12 AM
  #14  
ypsetihw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY

Bikes: s-1

why not a 38 or 39 or even 33T single up front? my commuter is a 1x7 with a 33 up front and an 11-28 8 speed in the back with the smallest cog locked out due to frame clearance. it has a really low gear, is very simple to setup, adjust, and maintain, and the highest gear will still get it to 25mph, which is more than I need when loaded or towing a trailer.
ypsetihw is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Again
Bicycle Mechanics
16
08-26-11 11:13 PM
joejack951
Bicycle Mechanics
23
01-21-11 12:03 PM
|3iker
Bicycle Mechanics
17
06-23-10 04:28 PM
richardtc
Bicycle Mechanics
6
02-27-10 12:48 PM
RFC
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
23
12-06-09 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.