What does it mean when the width is written on the RIM?
10-15-16 | 05:56 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 69
Likes: 2
What does it mean when the width is written on the RIM?
I see some 26” wheels, they are rated 26x1.5 or 26x1.75/2.125 etc, this is written on the rim. Measuring the internal width of the rim is usually less than the stated number and even putting on a tire the width can vary a lot, for example a 26x1.5 rim can take a 1.5” wide tire or wider or thinner (according to sheldon brown’s chart and my own experience too). So what is the reason for the second number in the 26 x X.XX when it is written on the rim? And why do some rims have two numbers after the x, for ex 26x1.75/2.125?
10-15-16 | 03:11 PM
#2
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 164
From: Mountain Brook. AL
It means the rim manufacturer wants to be precise as to rim stats. It makes it a little easier to know what size tire is
optimal, which referring the doubly numbered rims, the tire sizes the rim maker feels the rim is suited for.
optimal, which referring the doubly numbered rims, the tire sizes the rim maker feels the rim is suited for.
10-15-16 | 05:37 PM
#4
Really Old Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,639
Likes: 1,887
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3
Back in my bike flipping days, I've seen rims marked 1.5 that was wider than one marked 1.75.
Either would be totally fine for a 1.25" tire.
Either would be totally fine for a 1.25" tire.
10-15-16 | 06:21 PM
#5
Nigel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 7
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
Straight answer - next to nothing.
The 559 is the important number.
The important measurement is the inside width, which may or maynot have any correspondence with the numbers on the label.
The 559 is the important number.
The important measurement is the inside width, which may or maynot have any correspondence with the numbers on the label.
10-16-16 | 10:56 PM
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
I want to say that when a rim width is listed with ISO or ETRTO nearby, it's the inner width. But I'll welcome corrections. 
10-17-16 | 09:04 AM
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,353
Likes: 5,471
From: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
I disagree WRT the example given and the common experience of tires of vastly different widths being OEM speced on rims with this "1.5" label. (Note I said "label" not dimension or size). If fact it could be said that having a tire reference on a rim is misleading.
Back in the beginning of the MtB movement we (the USA) had various import tariffs on bikes and parts (IIRC it was the industry group known as BMA/6 that lobbied and attained said tariffs). These tariffs used the dimensional language that was in use by the US manufactures at that time. So 26x1.75, 26x1 3/4, 26x2.125 were all the spec that triggered a tariff. So the foreign manufactures simply changed their labeling of some parts to end up with a work around of the tariffs. These different labels caught on by the buying public (if for no other reason then the need to believe their non US made bike was better and unique then the gas pipe stuff the US mostly made).
Is this what really happened? I have never had a manufacturer industry insider or a government employee confirm this but I have heard this story from a number of supply side and retail sources over the years. Andy.
