Ultegra 9-spd triple and TA Specialties outer ring.
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 2
From: Cedar Rapids, IA
Bikes: 2018 Salsa Marakesh / 2006 HooKooEKoo / 2005 CoMotion Nor'wester / 1987 Trek 520 and 560EX (1 ea.)
Ultegra 9-spd triple and TA Specialties outer ring.
Has anyone had luck using a 48 tooth TA Specialities outer ring on an Ultegra 6500 triple crankset? Does it shift correctly with STI brifters?
I did a little research and am not finding it too encouraging so far, I thought this combo would be fairly straightforward.
I did a little research and am not finding it too encouraging so far, I thought this combo would be fairly straightforward.
#4
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 1,678
From: San Diego, CA
It will work but from my experience the shifting will tend to hesitate just slightly. Some people are fine with that, others not so much. Nothing works better than the properly matched OEM Shimano rings but of course they don't make a 48 for your 6500. Sometimes better gear ratios are worth the slight inconvenience of slower shifting.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
There is another potential problem. Assuming your crank has the original 52/42/30 chainrings, the substitution of a 48T for the largest ring and lowering the front derailleur so it's positioned properly may cause the inner cage of the front derailleur to hit the 42T middle ring. Most current front derailleurs are spec'ed for a 10 tooth or more difference between adjacent chainrings and that 6T difference may cause interference.
#6
There is another potential problem. Assuming your crank has the original 52/42/30 chainrings, the substitution of a 48T for the largest ring and lowering the front derailleur so it's positioned properly may cause the inner cage of the front derailleur to hit the 42T middle ring. Most current front derailleurs are spec'ed for a 10 tooth or more difference between adjacent chainrings and that 6T difference may cause interference.
Two things to try:
1. don't lower the front derailleur. Leave it hanging in midair and see if it shifts OK and doesn't lose the chain to the outside.
2. try a "double" front derailleur. If you're not changing the inner ring (i.e. a 30-42-48 triple) it might work if the derailleur has enough movement to cover all the rings. The "double" inner cage plate is probably skinny enough that you can lower it to where it makes the shift.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#7
Francophile

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,828
Likes: 2,146
From: Seattle
Bikes: Lots
There is another potential problem. Assuming your crank has the original 52/42/30 chainrings, the substitution of a 48T for the largest ring and lowering the front derailleur so it's positioned properly may cause the inner cage of the front derailleur to hit the 42T middle ring. Most current front derailleurs are spec'ed for a 10 tooth or more difference between adjacent chainrings and that 6T difference may cause interference.
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 2
From: Cedar Rapids, IA
Bikes: 2018 Salsa Marakesh / 2006 HooKooEKoo / 2005 CoMotion Nor'wester / 1987 Trek 520 and 560EX (1 ea.)









