Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Chain riding between new chainrings

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Chain riding between new chainrings

Old 01-03-18, 11:31 AM
  #1  
12strings
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Chain riding between new chainrings

I had an FSA Vero triple chainset (30,39,50...paired with a Sora 9-speed transmission) and replaced the middle chainring with a 42 tooth ring. Now I sometimes get the chain not going all the way to the small ring when down-shifting. It works a lot of the time, bit sometimes, under load, it will rest between the rings and they will spin without engaging the chain. It doesn't jam, not enough room.

I'm thinking 2 possibilities:

1. New middle ring is incompatible (it had indents for the bolts, and upshifts fine, so don't think its on backwards.) It is labeled as a 10-speed ring.

2. Small ring got put back on backwards. When looking at it, the dish of the teeth take them father away from the middle ring. Is that correct? Flipping it would definitely bring them closer, bit if its wrong might make them too close...there are no markings on the small ring, or indents for bolts to inset...very plain.

Any help would be appreciated... Otherwise ill try flipping the small ring and see what happens.
12strings is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 11:42 AM
  #2  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,315 Times in 826 Posts
With friction shifting I never had this issue.. 52-42-26 .. 50-40-24.. 48-36-22..

.
When looking at it, the dish of the teeth take them father away from the middle ring
Too vague.. measure it.. speak of those numbers...
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 11:47 AM
  #3  
12strings
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob View Post
With friction shifting I never had this issue.. 52-42-26 .. 50-40-24.. 48-36-22..

.
Too vague.. measure it.. speak of those numbers...
Maybe will try tonight...what I mean is that the teeth of the ring are closer to the center of the bike than the center of the ring. So flipping it will definitely make them closer...bit maybe too close.
12strings is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 11:55 AM
  #4  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,315 Times in 826 Posts
Chain line; a 2nd line parallel to the bike center line ..... distance to the middle chainring ,


and the cog in the middle of the rear cluster, 5-7-9-11, or the gap between the 2 central cogs , if an even number 6-8-10.





....
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 12:00 PM
  #5  
curbtender
Senior Member
 
curbtender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 6,799

Bikes: Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Schwinn Speedster, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, MB3

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 549 Times in 377 Posts
Yes, it could be backward, or a spacer misplaced? Wouldn't hurt to take it off and check. Does the middle ring have any ramping to it?
curbtender is online now  
Old 01-03-18, 12:33 PM
  #6  
12strings
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by curbtender View Post
Yes, it could be backward, or a spacer misplaced? Wouldn't hurt to take it off and check. Does the middle ring have any ramping to it?
Yes it does, and as I said, it upshifts small to middle. The ramps may be too far from the center of the ring?

This is it, the 42t one...
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B007HVFPU0/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1515004488&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=fsa%2B42%2Btooth%2Bring&dpPl=1&dpID=41%2Bfgh96glL&ref=plSrch&th=1& psc=1

Last edited by 12strings; 01-03-18 at 12:38 PM.
12strings is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 01:13 PM
  #7  
bradtx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,576

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
12strings, If up and down shifting between middle and outer is okay, flip the inner chain ring and see ho w that works.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 01:59 PM
  #8  
headasunder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 314
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Normally any markings like tooth count are stamped on the side of the inner ring that faces the frame.
headasunder is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 03:04 PM
  #9  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 22,519

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2564 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times in 754 Posts
I've seen this happen, even with friction shifting, when using a modern narrow chain with a crank designed for a wider chain.

A couple things to try: 1) as you suggest, perhaps the middle ring is backwards, although the counterbores for the chainring bolts make this difficult to miss. It would be an easy fix, if it is the case, though.


2) Try a wider chain. Are you perhaps using a 10 or 11-speed chain with your 9-speed cluster?
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 06:16 PM
  #10  
12strings
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I am definitely using a 9-speed chain. Upon further examination and experimentation, I have determined that the inner ring WAS oriented correctly...flipping it made the chain rub the middle ring constantly.

I also determined that the new chainring does not seem to have as large of ramps as the old one, so that seems to be the problem. I plan to install the old ring...back to 39t.
12strings is offline  
Old 01-03-18, 07:34 PM
  #11  
ThermionicScott 
7-speed cultist
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 20,113

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)

Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2797 Post(s)
Liked 748 Times in 525 Posts
Any pics of the setup as you had it? Since you're mixing chainrings that weren't designed to shift together, you might try re-orienting the middle ring in one of the other 4 possible positions to see if it shifts better for you.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 01-04-18, 07:11 AM
  #12  
12strings
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott View Post
Any pics of the setup as you had it? Since you're mixing chainrings that weren't designed to shift together, you might try re-orienting the middle ring in one of the other 4 possible positions to see if it shifts better for you.
Thanks, I think I'm done experimenting with this ring. The ramps are noticeably smaller on the new ring, and they just don't stick out enough to consistent push the chain onto the small ring.

No big loss, it was a $20 chainring. I was hoping to get a bit more top end out of my middle gear, but its not a big deal.

Fyi, I think I got mixed up in my mind, having read that a 10 speed crankset will work with a 9 speed drivetrain...I mistakingly assumed that a 10-speed chainring mounted on an "8/9" (per the labal on my fsa crank) crank would also work, but it seems the spacing of the rings is too wide to work consistent.

What probably WOULD have worked, is putting the small ring on backwards, with some kind of spacer to move it a bit farther from the middle ring, bit not as far as it was when installed correctly.
12strings is offline  
Old 01-04-18, 09:43 AM
  #13  
ThermionicScott 
7-speed cultist
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 20,113

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)

Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2797 Post(s)
Liked 748 Times in 525 Posts
Originally Posted by 12strings View Post
Thanks, I think I'm done experimenting with this ring. The ramps are noticeably smaller on the new ring, and they just don't stick out enough to consistent push the chain onto the small ring.

No big loss, it was a $20 chainring. I was hoping to get a bit more top end out of my middle gear, but its not a big deal.

Fyi, I think I got mixed up in my mind, having read that a 10 speed crankset will work with a 9 speed drivetrain...I mistakingly assumed that a 10-speed chainring mounted on an "8/9" (per the labal on my fsa crank) crank would also work, but it seems the spacing of the rings is too wide to work consistent.

What probably WOULD have worked, is putting the small ring on backwards, with some kind of spacer to move it a bit farther from the middle ring, bit not as far as it was when installed correctly.
I prefer a 42T to a 39T as well. Gives you a little more upper range before you need to switch out of it, so I get it.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 01-04-18, 11:56 AM
  #14  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,315 Times in 826 Posts
Potentially you can fill the gap with spacers and an extra set of bolts , DIY drilled and threaded..

so the chainrings wont spread, and the chain wont force itself in the gap.



You create unnecessary problems trying to shift under a load, are you doing that ?








...
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-04-18, 12:50 PM
  #15  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,422

Bikes: Lots. Just...lots.

Mentioned: 177 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1504 Post(s)
Liked 832 Times in 406 Posts
It is possible that your problem is related more to 1) your Sora FD (which I am going to assume is being shifted by an STI and not a down tube or bar end friction shifter), and 2) the change in chainring size. I know that Shimano STI shifting systems tend to be very sensitive with regard to chainring tooth count, and even though 39 to 42 teeth doesn't sound like a lot, it may be just enough to confuse your FD.

I experienced this personally when trying to improve the shifting on my Voyageur: it balked badly between the middle and inner gears as a 50/34/24 and after trying multiple FD's would only make the shift if I was four gears down from the largest cog, but it now shifts perfectly every time in every possible gear combination using a crankset with the 48/36/24 chainrings for which it was designed. So, there's that.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is online now  
Old 01-04-18, 12:58 PM
  #16  
Bike Gremlin
Mostly harmless
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,174

Bikes: Custom made on Scott Speedster frame, Custom made on a 1996. steel MTB frame (all but frame changed at least once in the past 20 years).

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 994 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by rccardr View Post
It is possible that your problem is related more to 1) your Sora FD (which I am going to assume is being shifted by an STI and not a down tube or bar end friction shifter), and 2) the change in chainring size. I know that Shimano STI shifting systems tend to be very sensitive with regard to chainring tooth count, and even though 39 to 42 teeth doesn't sound like a lot, it may be just enough to confuse your FD.

I experienced this personally when trying to improve the shifting on my Voyageur: it balked badly between the middle and inner gears as a 50/34/24 and after trying multiple FD's would only make the shift if I was four gears down from the largest cog, but it now shifts perfectly every time in every possible gear combination using a crankset with the 48/36/24 chainrings for which it was designed. So, there's that.
There's also difference in chainring ramps and gaps profiles. 42-52 combo doesn't use the same profile as 39-53 one. The old standards of Shimano chainring labeling were A and B. Now they have also M (for MTB I guess), T for trecking, FD, NB and loads of others. Combining two (or three) different labels on one crankset is not advised - sometimes it works better, sometimes worse. Some explanation can be found here (A, B and E types at least):

The Truth About the Shimano A and B Type Chainrings - The Tall Cyclist
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 01-04-18, 01:09 PM
  #17  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,422

Bikes: Lots. Just...lots.

Mentioned: 177 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1504 Post(s)
Liked 832 Times in 406 Posts
An excellent point, and one which I competely missed. That happens when you exclusively use downtube shifters- everything can eventually be made to work!
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is online now  
Old 01-04-18, 02:04 PM
  #18  
12strings
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Well, the original crank, chainrings and the new one were FSA.

With Sora derailer. I'm sure there is a shim fix possible, but not sure I want to mess with it.
12strings is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raria
Bicycle Mechanics
17
10-17-18 02:48 PM
El Gato27
Bicycle Mechanics
3
09-30-18 07:55 PM
Ludkeh
Tandem Cycling
14
02-06-13 03:35 PM
jim p
Bicycle Mechanics
24
07-12-12 11:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.