Changing rotor size
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Changing rotor size
I just bought my first bike with disc brakes, they are TRP Spyre-C mechanical discs. It came equipped with 160mm rotors. Would there be any compatibility issues if I want to try 140mm rotors? Is it just a matter of changing the rotors, or would other adjustments need to be made?
#2
Banned
caliper has to grip the disc, so it's mounting has to be lower to stay on the disc,
of course.
but the materials the discs are cut from remain same as larger of same
make & model..
of course.
but the materials the discs are cut from remain same as larger of same
make & model..
#3
Non omnino gravis
Really depends on how the calipers attach to the frame-- most post/IS mounts have a minimum rotor size, and pretty much all frames have a maximum rotor size. For instance my Ritchey can run a 160mm rear rotor, and no other. The caliper cannot be mounted 10mm lower to fit a 140mm rotor, and the frame will not clear a 180mm rotor.
There is absolutely no benefit to a smaller rotor other than saving a tiny bit of weight-- about 10-15g per rotor. You could achieve greater savings by switching to lightweight rotors like Ashima AiRotors, going to titanium fasteners, or both.
There is absolutely no benefit to a smaller rotor other than saving a tiny bit of weight-- about 10-15g per rotor. You could achieve greater savings by switching to lightweight rotors like Ashima AiRotors, going to titanium fasteners, or both.
#4
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6201 Post(s)
Liked 4,204 Times
in
2,358 Posts
I just bought my first bike with disc brakes, they are TRP Spyre-C mechanical discs. It came equipped with 160mm rotors. Would there be any compatibility issues if I want to try 140mm rotors? Is it just a matter of changing the rotors, or would other adjustments need to be made?
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#5
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
If there are adapters under the brake calipers then 140 mm rotors will probably work.
If the calipers mount directly to the frame/fork with no adapters then 140 mm rotors will not work.
TRP recommends 160 mm rotors on the front when using Spyre calipers.
The whole topic begs the question of why anyone would go through the trouble to replace 160 mm rotors with 140 mm rotors.
-Tim-
If the calipers mount directly to the frame/fork with no adapters then 140 mm rotors will not work.
TRP recommends 160 mm rotors on the front when using Spyre calipers.
The whole topic begs the question of why anyone would go through the trouble to replace 160 mm rotors with 140 mm rotors.
-Tim-
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,989
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2493 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
They do? Is that as a lower limit? That would make sense. As an upper limit restriction, less so. Last year I bought a set of Spyres for our tandem and at the same time I bought adapters (TRP has adapters and rotors up to 203mm) so I could mount 180mm rotors front and rear. The LBS did not think this was a bad idea. Usually its the front end that has no upper limit on rotor size because there is nothing to get in the way. The front end is also where the greater capacity brake can do the most good. I recently bought another high performance tandem that I requested be equipped with Spyre calipers. It came with 160mm rotors f/r and I was planning to move the rear 180 from the older tandem to the front of the new one. Can you point me to the information from TRP that explains this restriction on rotor size?