![]() |
Originally Posted by Kontact
(Post 20380677)
Shimano 11 speed freehub bodies and cassettes are 1.85mm wider than the 8/9/10 speed freehub.
|
Originally Posted by Eggman84
(Post 20381219)
Kontact, really like your posts in general (I learn a lot from them) so I'm not trying to start any battles here. But your response in this case is a little simplistic I believe. I could be full of it but Shimano compatible freehub body widths are not all the same. Yes, the Shimano 11s road freehub body is 1.85 mm wider than the Shimano 8/9/10s bodies (which were same for road and MTB) so an 11s road cassette fits exactly but an 11s MTB cassette must be fitted using an 1.85mm spacer. The Shimano 11s MTB freehub body is the same width as the Shimano 8/9/10s body so an 11s road cassette will not fit (about 1.85 mm to wide) but an 11s MTB cassette will fit with no spacer. Why? Because the largest cog on a Shimano MTB cassette is mounted on a spider with other cogs, and this largest cog overhangs the inside of the freehub body. But wont this interfere with the spokes? No, the monster 11s large cogs have such a large diameter that the chain and RD will not touch the spokes. Why didn’t Shimano make 11-speed road cassettes compatible with Shimano 8/9/10s hubs? The smaller large cogs of road-oriented cassettes, even with a 28 or 32 tooth large cog, would interfere with the spokes if fit on a 8/9/10s Shimano freehub, Notice that I have not said anything about any other manufacturer's hub (or cassette). This of course is completely off topic to the OPs question but just indicative of the non standardization we are dealing with. And it ain't getting any better in the near future,
I don't think any of the discussion about overhang or not really matter in terms of why the Xtender does or doesn't work on a Shimano cassette. Anyone who wants to measure the overhang just needs to put a straightedge over the back of their removed cassette. That will end any sort of debate. |
Originally Posted by Eggman84
(Post 20381219)
Kontact, really like your posts in general (I learn a lot from them) so I'm not trying to start any battles here. But your response in this case is a little simplistic I believe. I could be full of it but Shimano compatible freehub body widths are not all the same. Yes, the Shimano 11s road freehub body is 1.85 mm wider than the Shimano 8/9/10s bodies (which were same for road and MTB) so an 11s road cassette fits exactly but an 11s MTB cassette must be fitted using an 1.85mm spacer. The Shimano 11s MTB freehub body is the same width as the Shimano 8/9/10s body so an 11s road cassette will not fit (about 1.85 mm to wide) but an 11s MTB cassette will fit with no spacer. Why? Because the largest cog on a Shimano MTB cassette is mounted on a spider with other cogs, and this largest cog overhangs the inside of the freehub body. But wont this interfere with the spokes? No, the monster 11s large cogs have such a large diameter that the chain and RD will not touch the spokes. Why didn’t Shimano make 11-speed road cassettes compatible with Shimano 8/9/10s hubs? The smaller large cogs of road-oriented cassettes, even with a 28 or 32 tooth large cog, would interfere with the spokes if fit on a 8/9/10s Shimano freehub, Notice that I have not said anything about any other manufacturer's hub (or cassette). This of course is completely off topic to the OPs question but just indicative of the non standardization we are dealing with. And it ain't getting any better in the near future,
|
Originally Posted by MrRider
(Post 20381283)
... I'm just about to replace my 11-32 with an 11-42. Would that qualify as needing such a spacer EggMan? I'd have to order one wouldn't I? I thought I was now ready to slap it all together, but looks like I might not be there yet.
If you end up not needing it you can possibly return it or be out $6. A LBS should also have a supply of spacers. So if you slide the new cassette on your hub, and find you need a spacer, you could just run down to your LBS and they could fit the correct one on. I think the spacer goes on first, then the cassette. Good luck and hope you get the gearing you want. |
Originally Posted by Eggman84
(Post 20382124)
Based on the info you are providing, I assume your current 11-32 is an 11s road cassette and the proposed 11-42 is an 11s MTB cassette, So yes you should purchase a 1.85mm spacer like what you can find at https://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=61155&category=503about
If you end up not needing it you can possibly return it or be out $6. A LBS should also have a supply of spacers. So if you slide the new cassette on your hub, and find you need a spacer, you could just run down to your LBS and they could fit the correct one on. I think the spacer goes on first, then the cassette. Good luck and hope you get the gearing you want. The 11-32 cassette is Shimano 105 11-speed and the 11-42 is a Sunshine mtb cassette. I'll have the tools tomorrow to do the job and will use the local bike shop for the part. Thanks a lot. |
Originally Posted by Eggman84
(Post 20382124)
Based on the info you are providing, I assume your current 11-32 is an 11s road cassette and the proposed 11-42 is an 11s MTB cassette, So yes you should purchase a 1.85mm spacer like what you can find at https://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=61155&category=503about
If you end up not needing it you can possibly return it or be out $6. A LBS should also have a supply of spacers. So if you slide the new cassette on your hub, and find you need a spacer, you could just run down to your LBS and they could fit the correct one on. I think the spacer goes on first, then the cassette. Good luck and hope you get the gearing you want. It turned out that a spacer was not required for the 11-42 Sunshine mtb cassette. Just like the 11-32 Shimano 105 cassette, the Sunshine's big cog was also housed on a spider. Therefore I assume the freehub that came with my Giant Contend is such that a spacer is not required when a spider houses the big cog. I assume that with a typical road cassette, the biggest cog is not housed on a spider? In that regard perhaps this particular 11-32 Shimano 105 cassette is an atypical example of a road cassette. When I tried using a spacer on the 11-42 cassette, the 11-tooth cog would not slide onto the freehub splines. The stack (total cassette width) of the 11-42 Sunshine cassette is exactly the same as the stack of the Shimano 105 11-32 cassette. |
Originally Posted by MrRider
(Post 20384640)
I thought I'd let you know how I got on for your information. When I took the 11-32 Shimano 5800 cassette off, it turned out I had a good half dozen or so spacers to work with lol. Every cog but the big three were separate, the last three (25-28-32) being riveted together on what I assume is a spider.
It turned out that a spacer was not required for the 11-42 Sunshine mtb cassette. Just like the 11-32 Shimano 105 cassette, the Sunshine's big cog was also housed on a spider. Therefore I assume the freehub that came with my Giant Contend is such that a spacer is not required when a spider houses the big cog. I assume that with a typical road cassette, the biggest cog is not housed on a spider? In that regard perhaps this particular 11-32 Shimano 105 cassette is an atypical example of a road cassette. When I tried using a spacer on the 11-42 cassette, the 11-tooth cog would not slide onto the freehub splines. The stack (total cassette width) of the 11-42 Sunshine cassette is exactly the same as the stack of the Shimano 105 11-32 cassette. |
Originally Posted by Eggman84
(Post 20384707)
Interesting. When you had the cassettes on their side on a table, did both the largest cog and spider rest on the table. If so, then the largest cog is not "overhanging the inside of the free hub".
So this must mean that the big cog is indeed overhanging the inside of the freehub, I assume by 1.85mm. And if I understand right, that should require the use of a spacer. But, as I said, for some reason the spacer results in both cassettes not fitting. I can only think that the hub dimensions themselves aren't typical. I've been told that they're probably Formula hubs, but I'm not 100%. Do mtb hubs typically require spacers for a mtb cassette? If not, then it might be resembling a mtb hub. |
Originally Posted by Eggman84
(Post 20384707)
Interesting. When you had the cassettes on their side on a table, did both the largest cog and spider rest on the table. If so, then the largest cog is not "overhanging the inside of the free hub".
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...89533dd1af.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4054bed296.jpg |
Originally Posted by MrRider
(Post 20385162)
....So this must mean that the big cog is indeed overhanging the inside of the freehub, I assume by 1.85mm. And if I understand right, that should require the use of a spacer. But, as I said, for some reason the spacer results in both cassettes not fitting. I can only think that the hub dimensions themselves aren't typical. I've been told that they're probably Formula hubs, but I'm not 100%. Do mtb hubs typically require spacers for a mtb cassette? If not, then it might be resembling a mtb hub.
Hope you like the new gearing. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.