Is this new chainring trashed?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 54
Is this new chainring trashed?
Dramatic title for attention :-). I just bought this from a guy, and it has zero miles on it. He did try to mount it on his cranks but it wasn’t a fit. I just realized that one of the bolt holes is separated and doesn’t sit flush. He’s a good guy and has offered a refund. Didn’t realize it was affected when he tried to fit it. My question is, will it still work okay and is it safe? The part of the ring that is separated doesn’t sit flush (maybe due to adhesive spots not lining up). Help appreciated. If it helps, the ring is a Shimano SLX M7000. About $25 or $30 new, paid $10. Mounting on FSA crankset.




Last edited by Plainsman; 04-22-20 at 03:45 PM. Reason: Add photos
#5
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,924
Likes: 589
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Not familiar with this chainring but I'd be willing to give it a try. Install it and see how it goes. Are you able to push the pieces together using pliers?
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 54
There looks to maybe be some type of adhesive or something where the two pieces were joined. I was concerned that putting some type of clamp on it (the area available for clamping/pliers is small) would deform the ring before pressing it back together. That gap you see, I can’t tell 100% if that’s caused by left over residue not mating properly between pieces, or if the top portion actually was deformed somehow. I didn’t even know this bolt “sleeve” was a two part component - can’t imagine the benefit of that.
#8
Dangerous Old Man
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 96
Likes: 12
From: San Francisco
Bikes: 2 custom built full Carbon road bikes, built by Moi...
There looks to maybe be some type of adhesive or something where the two pieces were joined. I was concerned that putting some type of clamp on it (the area available for clamping/pliers is small) would deform the ring before pressing it back together. That gap you see, I can’t tell 100% if that’s caused by left over residue not mating properly between pieces, or if the top portion actually was deformed somehow. I didn’t even know this bolt “sleeve” was a two part component - can’t imagine the benefit of that.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
As shown. Don't use unprotected jaws or you will mar the chainring.
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 54
Just talked to Shimano tech support and shared pics. They couldn’t / wouldn’t say safe to use and suggested I send it in warranty evaluation. Since I’m not even the first Owner I’ll just return it to the guy I bought it from. The tech I spoke with also wasn’t familiar with why it would have a two-part bolt sleeve.
#12
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,348
Likes: 5,254
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 54
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 233
From: Madison, WI
Bikes: Giant Toughroad SLR1 and Motobecane Sturgis NX
Does it even fit? M7000 uses 96mm proprietary nonsymmetricsl BCD. I doubt FSA makes non-standard cranks.
I may be wrong and they could have made something unusual.
I may be wrong and they could have made something unusual.
#16
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 1,653
From: San Diego, CA
I say send it back to Shimano. You get a new chainring and it may help Shimano find a potential issue with their manufacturing or quality control. I received a cassette once with two of the same size cogs in it and Shimano headquarters in Japan wanted it back in a big way. Very good customer service IMO.





