![]() |
I seem to remember from childhood a type of patch a neighbor kid had that you had to light on fire to get it to adhere properly.
|
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499681)
I've always been under the impression that "vulcanizing fluid" is the same thing as rubber cement. Is this wrong?
I looked it up. They aren't. But interestingly, I also read:
So now I am left wondering if what folks in this thread are calling vulcanizing cement is in fact rubber cement? |
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 22499879)
No, because we're talking about cold vulcanization here.
Is cold vulcanization glue the same as rubber cement? |
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499883)
OK.
Is cold vulcanization glue the same as rubber cement? |
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499883)
OK.
Is cold vulcanization glue the same as rubber cement? |
OK, it is the trichloroethylene solvent that is different.
cf: MSDS Canonical rubber cement uses n-heptane, a solvent that has the merit of not being a carcinogen. |
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499908)
OK, it is the trichloroethylene solvent that is different.
cf: MSDS Canonical rubber cement uses n-heptane, a solvent that has the merit of not being a carcinogen. There have been a lot of threads about this already, and [MENTION=21724]cyccommute[/MENTION] could give a much better explanation of the chemistry if he's not tired of it by now. ;) |
I'm also a chemist.
I remain skeptical that there is any difference apart from the solvent. If the solvent isn't the critical difference, why would they use a carcinogenic one? If I had to guess, [this is wrong; see below] trichloroethylene dissolves the surface layer of the butyl tube a little bit better than n-heptane. It works as a contact cement, so the solvent essentially enables the rubber contact glue to bond to the tube surface as it evaporates. Then the little bit of adhesive on the patch sticks to the tacky surface created on the tube as the solvent evaporates, and the patch bonds to the tube as you apply pressure. (I've used the little tubes primarily because the solvent dries up after you open it, not because I think it is magically different from rubber cement, which would probably be more than adequate. I found out the hard way the patch works reasonably well even in the absence of any cement.) |
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499728)
I seem to remember from childhood a type of patch a neighbor kid had that you had to light on fire to get it to adhere properly.
|
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499939)
I'm also a chemist.
I remain skeptical that there is any difference apart from the solvent. If the solvent isn't the critical difference, why would they use a carcinogenic one? (The theory you added to your post on edit sounds plausible, too. I just have two semesters of chemistry and a passing interest in how it works. :) ) |
For the record, I don't know anything about adhesives.
|
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499908)
OK, it is the trichloroethylene solvent that is different.
cf: MSDS Canonical rubber cement uses n-heptane, a solvent that has the merit of not being a carcinogen. |
Originally Posted by Sonofamechanic
(Post 22499346)
Anyone here old enough to remember the patches you would clamp in place and bond to the tube by burning them on? There was a flammable fabric on the pack of the patch (encased in a tin form) and you would light it with a match and the heat from the burn would apparently help the bond. I can still smell them! Must have been toxic…like everything else in the early 70’s. LOL
|
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499939)
I'm also a chemist.
I remain skeptical that there is any difference apart from the solvent. If the solvent isn't the critical difference, why would they use a carcinogenic one? If I had to guess, trichloroethylene dissolves the surface layer of the butyl tube a little bit better than n-heptane. It works as a contact cement, so the solvent essentially enables the rubber contact glue to bond to the tube surface as it evaporates. Then the little bit of adhesive on the patch sticks to the tacky surface created on the tube as the solvent evaporates, and the patch bonds to the tube as you apply pressure. (I've used the little tubes primarily because the solvent dries up after you open it, not because I think it is magically different from rubber cement, which would probably be more than adequate. I found out the hard way the patch works reasonably well even in the absence of any cement.) I’m not clear on how you can apply a patch without cement. By the way, I’m not an adhesive chemist either. Did a little bit of work on replacing phenol in phenol/formaldehyde plywood adhesives with wood pyrolysis oils long ago but that’s not this kid of adhesive. I have done a whole lot of studying of Rema’s patch chemistry as part of these kinds of discussions., however. |
Originally Posted by Fredo76
(Post 22500033)
Yes. My father still had some in the '70s. The back side had a pad of what seemed like cardboard made with gunpowder, that you could not put out once lit. Vulcan was the God of Fire, right? Real Vulcanizing involved real fire, that melted the patch material onto the tube. My friend did not believe my warning not to try lighting one, and filled the workshop with smoke minutes before my father came home. What are friends for?
|
This thread started to get some insults going. I deleted a couple posts. Let’s stop. If you don’t like a post, how about ignoring and move on rather than insulting?
|
Originally Posted by StanSeven
(Post 22500302)
This thread started to get some insults going. I deleted a couple posts. Let’s stop. If you don’t like a post, how about ignoring and move on rather than insulting?
|
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22499994)
For the record, I don't know anything about adhesives.
|
+1 Tubes properly patched with Rema brand patches and cement and properly "stitched" to the tube will be fine. The tube should be good as new. Just make sure you sprinkle talc around the patched area so that it doesn't stick to the inside of the tire.
|
Originally Posted by kingston
(Post 22496686)
I have a can of the rema cement that's getting a little thick. Is there something I can put in it to thin it out?
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 22497115)
The SDS says that the solvent is naphtha...
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...c4aa2ae255.png https://media.napaonline.com/is/cont...y/113869197pdf |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 22497115)
The SDS says that the solvent is naphtha. Proportion of solvent needed might be hard to judge. Mineral spirits will probably work. The low flash point, odored version would be better but is hard to find. Try a test on some before adding it to the whole can.
|
Another pro patch tip. A DE razor with an aggressive head works great for shaving down the seams before sanding. I used a cheap Merkur Futur knockoff.
|
I'm between jobs for a few weeks right now. This must be what Tuesday in retirement will be like for me someday.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4091c3dafd.jpg |
Not sure why anyone is messing with old school style patches and cement. These work just as good and no mess...
https://www.parktool.com/product/super-patch-kit-gp-2 |
Originally Posted by prj71
(Post 22502806)
Not sure why anyone is messing with old school style patches and cement. These work just as good and no mess...
https://www.parktool.com/product/super-patch-kit-gp-2 |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.