Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Understanding cog ratios

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Understanding cog ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-22 | 01:57 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 44
Likes: 9
Understanding cog ratios

Hi guys,

I currently have a setup with a 42T front chainring and a 14T rear sprocket. I really like the resistance this gives me for riding around my area, however, I am wondering this:

If I switch to an 11T rear sprocket and 33T front chainring, this will give me the exact same ratio but will it give me the exqact same pedalling experience on the bike?

What would I be losing by making this change? Surely there has to be something?
bikethis is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 04:01 AM
  #2  
alcjphil's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 2,253
From: Montreal, Quebec
11 tooth cogs wear out much faster than 14 tooth cogs
They also are not as smooth https://chain-guide.com/basics/2-2-1-chordal-action.html

Last edited by alcjphil; 08-03-22 at 04:08 AM.
alcjphil is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 04:06 AM
  #3  
Aardwolf's Avatar
Wheelman
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 1,632
From: Putney, London UK

Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone, 1953 Holdsworth Whirlwind

I've found Gear Calculator good for comparing cogs:

https://www.gear-calculator.com/?GR=...N=MPH&DV=speed

The 'Compare' button at the bottom right lets you compare two setups directly.
Aardwolf is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 04:56 AM
  #4  
...
Titanium Club Membership
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 3,487
From: Whitestone and Rensselaerville, New York

Bikes: '23 Canyon Endurace, '87 Bottecchia Equipe Professional

What alcjphil said. The bigger sized gearing will be smoother
BTinNYC is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 08:12 AM
  #5  
DiabloScott's Avatar
It's MY mountain
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,175
Likes: 4,236
From: Mt.Diablo

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Originally Posted by bikethis
If I switch to an 11T rear sprocket and 33T front chainring, this will give me the exact same ratio but will it give me the exact same pedalling experience on the bike?

What would I be losing by making this change? Surely there has to be something?
Switching from a 42t to a 33t probably means switching to a triple crank - some people like them and some don't... but it'll be different.
DiabloScott is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 08:16 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 2,104
A 54 x 18 is more macho, a 33 x 11 is a bit weenie aside from wearing out faster and adding more friction
GhostRider62 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 08:39 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 44
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
Switching from a 42t to a 33t probably means switching to a triple crank - some people like them and some don't... but it'll be different.
Can you explain why please? I have a 34T chainring that I used to run on this bike and it worked fine apart from being too easy to pedal.
bikethis is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 08:40 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 44
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by GhostRider62
A 54 x 18 is more macho, a 33 x 11 is a bit weenie aside from wearing out faster and adding more friction
Unfortunately my frame won't allow for anything larger than a 42T.
bikethis is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 09:27 AM
  #9  
cxwrench's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,767
Likes: 2,940
From: Nor-Cal

Bikes: lots

Post #2 answered your question perfectly. What more do you want to know?
cxwrench is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 10:08 AM
  #10  
79pmooney's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,171
Likes: 5,299
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Originally Posted by bikethis
Unfortunately my frame won't allow for anything larger than a 42T.
Tell us what your bike is and what crankset you are using and we might be able to help you more. (Not being able to use bigger than 42 teeth? It's an unusual bike that won't allow bigger with a standard crankset if it as a regular road bike that takes 27" or 700c wheels. Most single speed and fix gear bikes and wheels are designed to use a chainline a set distance from the center of the seat tube. (42mm if I recall correctly.) That chainline virtually always allows as big a chainring you you can get.

Chainlines - they should be straight for SS and fix gear. You should be able to sight up the chain from the rear and see no "S" turn to it. If your bike is a conversion from a double or triple, it may well be that the small chainrings are inside that proper chainline and not aligned with the rear cog. (Knowing nothing of your bike or setup, this is all speculation. But Diablo Scott's comments may well be on the widths of various types of cranksets pressed into single speed duty.)
79pmooney is online now  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 02:38 PM
  #11  
DiabloScott's Avatar
It's MY mountain
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,175
Likes: 4,236
From: Mt.Diablo

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Originally Posted by bikethis
Can you explain why please? I have a 34T chainring that I used to run on this bike and it worked fine apart from being too easy to pedal.
34t is about as small as most double chainrings go - it has to do with standard dimensions in the crank to mount the rings - called the "bolt circle diameter"
33t requires a different BCD - like the kind that triples come with.
You almost certainly cannot swap the 34 you have now with a 33... you might be able to find a whole new "sub-compact" double crank that has a smaller ring.
So it's just an availability issue.
DiabloScott is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 03:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Likes: 177
Originally Posted by bikethis
Hi guys,

I currently have a setup with a 42T front chainring and a 14T rear sprocket. I really like the resistance this gives me for riding around my area, however, I am wondering this:

If I switch to an 11T rear sprocket and 33T front chainring, this will give me the exact same ratio but will it give me the exqact same pedalling experience on the bike?

What would I be losing by making this change? Surely there has to be something?
The smaller cog won't be as efficient.
davidad is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 04:35 PM
  #13  
alcjphil's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 2,253
From: Montreal, Quebec
Maybe we should all recall this thread: Correct chain length not possible?
alcjphil is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-22 | 09:41 PM
  #14  
Ironfish653's Avatar
Dirty Heathen
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 1,046
From: MC-778, 6250 fsw

Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033

^^^This.

OP is in a "throw parts at it and see what sticks" phase of his project
Ironfish653 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.