Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Chainline - how important is it really?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Chainline - how important is it really?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-23 | 02:33 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 511
Likes: 240
Chainline - how important is it really?

Hi,

coming from a cup/cone style BB with a square taper, i see that there are a variety of spindle length available with the UN300 BB from Shimano. Given that I will be using a 2x7 setup, how impactful is the chainline really? As long as i don't hit the chainstays with the crank and the middle of the cassette is somewhat close to the middle of the front chainrings will there be any real, tangible issues? I do not race, like to climb hills and use DT friction shifting.

Thanks !
P!
Positron400 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-23 | 02:43 AM
  #2  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,659
Likes: 1,898
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Get it off too far the and the FDER won't be in the correct location.

The point of a good chain line is that every thing functions and you run the straightest chain possible for the gears you use most.
That may not necessarily be the "perfect" chainline.
I tend to use the middle ring and outer cogs the most.
Therefore, I use a "slightly" longer spindle if convenient, because sometimes you use what you have handy.

Since you currently have a serviceable BB, why not tell us what the "code" printed on the spindle?
It should be something like 3-P or other letter.
Then go to Sheldon to see the symmetrical equivalent.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize.html



Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 05-08-23 at 02:48 AM.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-23 | 02:52 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 511
Likes: 240
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
Get it off too far the and the FDER won't be in the correct location.

The point of a good chain line is that every thing functions and you run the straightest chain possible for the gears you use most.
That may not necessarily be the "perfect" chainline.
I tend to use the middle ring and outer cogs the most.
Therefore, I use a "slightly" longer spindle if convenient, because sometimes you use what you have handy.

Since you currently have a serviceable BB, why not tell us what the "code" printed on the spindle?
It should be something like 3-P or other letter.
Then go to Sheldon to see the symmetrical equivalent.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize.html


Thanks - i would tell you the spindle length, but currently waiting on a pin spanner to remove the NDS cup.
It should be a JIS taper.
FDER? Front Derailleur?
Positron400 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-23 | 09:00 AM
  #4  
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,362
Likes: 5,503
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

With the wider chains and cog to cog spacing that 7 speed systems have the chainline being spot on is a lesser need, than with the current 10+ systems. Still, aiming for the center is a good goal and the minor unavoidable tolerance will be OK.

Not mentioned is the chain drop that has motivated so much 1 by chainring tooth design and cage pivot clutches. Some will leave the ft der on the bike just to act as a guide and help prevent chain drop. Back in the day ring teeth had a higher peak, engaged the chain link deeper, than is current with rings designed to shift (as in a 2 by). So if you plan to just use one of the 2X rings and a rear der without a pivot clutch be aware that you could easily loose a chain at the wrong moment. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-23 | 12:10 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 511
Likes: 240
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
With the wider chains and cog to cog spacing that 7 speed systems have the chainline being spot on is a lesser need, than with the current 10+ systems. Still, aiming for the center is a good goal and the minor unavoidable tolerance will be OK.

Not mentioned is the chain drop that has motivated so much 1 by chainring tooth design and cage pivot clutches. Some will leave the ft der on the bike just to act as a guide and help prevent chain drop. Back in the day ring teeth had a higher peak, engaged the chain link deeper, than is current with rings designed to shift (as in a 2 by). So if you plan to just use one of the 2X rings and a rear der without a pivot clutch be aware that you could easily loose a chain at the wrong moment. Andy
thanks. I will be using both my front chainrings, so my FD is not just to keep the chain on but to enable shifting.
Since I've heard terrible things about the Shimano UN300 square taper BB, what are alternatives that last longer than just 500km, if I were to change the BB?
Positron400 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-23 | 03:49 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Short answer, it's moderately important, but not critical.

Given that Derailleur bikes obviously can manage with poor chain line, then it's more about degree and the combinations you prefer. For example, if you tend to ride the outer half of the cassette most of the time, outboard chainline might actually be an improvement, while inboard could be problematic.

So, this is about considering the specifics and using some judgement, rather than painting by numbers.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-23 | 05:27 PM
  #7  
79pmooney's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,172
Likes: 5,301
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Originally Posted by Positron400
thanks. I will be using both my front chainrings, so my FD is not just to keep the chain on but to enable shifting.
Since I've heard terrible things about the Shimano UN300 square taper BB, what are alternatives that last longer than just 500km, if I were to change the BB?
The easy answer, though not cheap, is Phil Wood. You can get exactly the chainline (and left crank location) you want, they last near forever and can be re-built or changed for other bikes and applications. There are Phil Wood BBs from the '70s that are still going and Phil Wood still backs and services them.
79pmooney is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.