Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

What QR skewer length for a 126mm frame?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

What QR skewer length for a 126mm frame?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-23, 08:11 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times in 339 Posts
What QR skewer length for a 126mm frame?

Hi

I don't understand how QR sizes are listed - they seem to be all over the place but I might just be ignorant of multiple standards or something,

I've got a 126mm OLD 7speed frame and I guess I can shorten a skewer that's too long as long as I still have threads (and ideally enough margin onto which I can screw a nut a bit tighter, to then back out to clean up the sawn off end?) but is there a correct length (however that gets specced) to try to get hold of for this width of dropouts?

Ta!

Last edited by choddo; 10-13-23 at 08:28 AM.
choddo is offline  
Old 10-13-23, 10:44 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,580

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1610 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times in 1,103 Posts
This might be useful when considering a replacement.
Bicycle Quick-Release Mechanisms (sheldonbrown.com)
  • Skewer length depends on the distance between the outside faces of the dropouts, and the depth of the adjusting nut. It is easiest to measure the distance between the outer faces of the dropouts after removing the wheel. This distance must match the length of the skewer from the base of the cam body to the base of the adjusting nut. Some anti-theft replacement skewers have thin nuts and shorter skewers, but if you know the spacing between the outside faces of the dropouts, you will be able to specify the correct replacement regardless of the skewer design. Most front hubs have an overlocknut distance of 100mm. Rear overlocknut distance may be anything from 110mm for older bicycles with a single rear sprocket up through 160mm for tandems. 130mm is most common on newer road bicycles, and 135mm on mountain bikes. Dropout thickness, counting both sides, ranges from 8mm for stamped steel dropouts to 20mm for aluminum dropouts. A derailer adapter claw, trailer hitch or other accessory may add to the length.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline  
Likes For SJX426:
Old 10-13-23, 11:47 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times in 339 Posts
Yeah thanks I’ve read that, the problem is I can’t measure the replacement. They all just say 140mm or 180mm or 192.5mm and I have no idea what specific points they are talking about.
choddo is offline  
Old 10-13-23, 01:05 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
maddog34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,979

Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1300 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 536 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
Yeah thanks I’ve read that, the problem is I can’t measure the replacement. They all just say 140mm or 180mm or 192.5mm and I have no idea what specific points they are talking about.
140mm is the "outside of dropouts" or "inside of both clamping faces" of a QR for that length axle...the distance for a steel frame at 130 O.L.D... the actual skewer length for those will be about 158 to 160mm. Nut lengths vary from 15 to 18mm, basically.

an old, old school Simplex here is about 155mm skewer length... it was in a road bike 126mm O.L.D. axle/hub....

all my dimensions are listed in the "QR Closed" configuration, and not done with any extreme precision.

the 180 and 192 dimensions sound like an "overall length" and are not very helpful, eh? kinda like sellers that list the shipping weight and package or box size, but neglect to list actual Part dimensions

Last edited by maddog34; 10-13-23 at 01:09 PM.
maddog34 is offline  
Likes For maddog34:
Old 10-13-23, 02:00 PM
  #5  
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,652

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3905 Post(s)
Liked 6,517 Times in 3,229 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
Is there a correct skewer length for 126mm 7-speed rear spacing?
Yes, it must be 126mm + dropouts width + skewer nut length.

I measured a few of mine from the end of the threads to the base of the skewer. They are all 156-157mm. If they protrude very far, I use a hacksaw to cut them down with the nut threaded on to clean the threads of the cut.

SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 10-13-23, 02:38 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
soyabean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: GMT-5
Posts: 964
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 562 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 278 Posts
Just how far are they protruding for it to become a problem?

Skewer nuts aren't acorn nuts, the M5 skewers can poke thru them as required.

I use titanium bolt skewers as an anti-theft on all my bikes, and some of them protrude as much as 1cm and it doesn't bother me.

I won't cut them because all my bikes are always for sale and when they do, I take them back.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
qr-skewer-IMG_7208.jpg (46.0 KB, 82 views)
soyabean is offline  
Likes For soyabean:
Old 10-13-23, 06:05 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,824

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5843 Post(s)
Liked 2,677 Times in 1,492 Posts
Skewers are typically measured from under the cap to the end, aka the length of the rod itself.

The easiest approach is to measure and existing skewer and the corresponding hub OLD. Then add or subtract the difference between the baseline hub and the new one.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 10-14-23 at 01:52 PM.
FBinNY is online now  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 10-13-23, 07:11 PM
  #8  
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,728

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1986 Post(s)
Liked 1,502 Times in 1,042 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, but is it the case that a regular rear QR skewer for a 130 mm OLD frame would not have an additional 4 mm of thread length?
SoSmellyAir is offline  
Old 10-13-23, 07:21 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,824

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5843 Post(s)
Liked 2,677 Times in 1,492 Posts
Originally Posted by SoSmellyAir
Pardon my ignorance, but is it the case that a regular rear QR skewer for a 130 mm OLD frame would not have an additional 4 mm of thread length?
Not necessarily. CPSC rules on pertrusions mean that makers cannot use a 130mm(OLD) skewer for a 126mm hub. So every skewer is specifically made for each hub width. There are no rule on thread length, with each maker allowing enough thread for the nut, along with a margin of error allowing for differences in dropout thickness.

So, that 130mm skewer might work with 126mm hub, if the dropouts are somewhat thick. Then again, it might not.

BTW if you only need a mm or two, you can use a drill or Dremel to create some thread relief inside the nut.

Last edited by FBinNY; 10-13-23 at 07:24 PM.
FBinNY is online now  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 10-14-23, 12:30 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by soyabean
Just how far are they protruding for it to become a problem?

Skewer nuts aren't acorn nuts, the M5 skewers can poke thru them as required.
Yeah my front one on my main road bike protrudes by about 5mm because it has very thin dropouts on an aero fork and I just don’t like how it looks but try to ignore it. This might end up the same way (have ordered a pair) but it’s the amount of thread I’m more concerned about. Fingers crossed.
choddo is offline  
Old 10-14-23, 07:17 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
soyabean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: GMT-5
Posts: 964
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 562 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 278 Posts
If the OP is bothered by skewers that "protrudes by about 5mm", they should just get a new perfect bike instead of their "OLD 7speed frame".

It is not an industry problem for longer skewers to be unsafe. There is no problem and thus nothing to resolve.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
bike snob.jpg (46.2 KB, 56 views)
soyabean is offline  
Old 10-14-23, 11:56 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by soyabean
If the OP is bothered by skewers that "protrudes by about 5mm", they should just get a new perfect bike instead of their "OLD 7speed frame".

It is not an industry problem for longer skewers to be unsafe. There is no problem and thus nothing to resolve.
The 5mm is on a different bike. Mine.

Not sure if you meant OLD as in measurement or age there, but the 7speed isn’t my bike, I’m sorting it out for my son’s girlfriend after she was a bit ripped off by a 2nd hand purchase. Not terrible but has needed quite a bit of work to get rideworthy.

I’m not trying to replace one that’s too long? I’m trying to find out which one fits to replace a shot rusty one, and if it works but protrudes 1cm I’ll trim it.

Bit of a strange aggressive wade-in.

Last edited by choddo; 10-14-23 at 12:01 PM.
choddo is offline  
Old 10-14-23, 05:26 PM
  #13  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,685

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 4,066 Times in 2,712 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
The 5mm is on a different bike. Mine.

Not sure if you meant OLD as in measurement or age there, but the 7speed isn’t my bike, I’m sorting it out for my son’s girlfriend after she was a bit ripped off by a 2nd hand purchase. Not terrible but has needed quite a bit of work to get rideworthy.

I’m not trying to replace one that’s too long? I’m trying to find out which one fits to replace a shot rusty one, and if it works but protrudes 1cm I’ll trim it.

Bit of a strange aggressive wade-in.
I think it was an attempt at the old comedy. Hence the picture of Bike Snobs book (which is fantastic, thanks to whomever left it at the shop years ago). I think the CSPC is over concerned on safety to the point they don't understand bicycles so they have silly rules that don't make any sense on certain bicycle things but exist none the less.
veganbikes is offline  
Likes For veganbikes:
Old 10-14-23, 06:06 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,824

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5843 Post(s)
Liked 2,677 Times in 1,492 Posts
Originally Posted by veganbikes
I think it was an attempt at the old comedy. Hence the picture of Bike Snobs book (which is fantastic, thanks to whomever left it at the shop years ago). I think the CSPC is over concerned on safety to the point they don't understand bicycles so they have silly rules that don't make any sense on certain bicycle things but exist none the less.
Way back when the CPSC originally drafted the rules, there was little debate about the necessity. During the boom of the late Sixties and early Seventies, people were slapping wheels and tubing together and calling them bicycles. Bikes were breaking and causing injuries and deaths in ways that people today couldn't imagine.

Things like headtubes coming off because they were butt joined without lugs or filets. Front wheels collapsing because spokes ended 5mm shy of the rim, riders getting slashed and gouged because of razor sharp edges all over.

I was involved as part of the industry, and the CPSC process was very different from how government regulates today. They identified the issues that were causing injuries, and listened to the industry about what was possible. In the end, they established very minimal and necessary standards, and left it to manufacturers to work out the details.

Generally the standards created minimal hardship for those already producing decent (not necessarily good) bikes, but forced the worst players to get serious about quality.

FWIW I was very resistant at the time, and felt that they should limit themselves to children's bikes. But as things were worked out, agreed that the process and final rules were sound. Except for the "secondary retention" rule for QRs which IMO causes more problem than it solves.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 10-15-23, 06:40 PM
  #15  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,685

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 4,066 Times in 2,712 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Way back when the CPSC originally drafted the rules, there was little debate about the necessity. During the boom of the late Sixties and early Seventies, people were slapping wheels and tubing together and calling them bicycles. Bikes were breaking and causing injuries and deaths in ways that people today couldn't imagine.

Things like headtubes coming off because they were butt joined without lugs or filets. Front wheels collapsing because spokes ended 5mm shy of the rim, riders getting slashed and gouged because of razor sharp edges all over.

I was involved as part of the industry, and the CPSC process was very different from how government regulates today. They identified the issues that were causing injuries, and listened to the industry about what was possible. In the end, they established very minimal and necessary standards, and left it to manufacturers to work out the details.

Generally the standards created minimal hardship for those already producing decent (not necessarily good) bikes, but forced the worst players to get serious about quality.

FWIW I was very resistant at the time, and felt that they should limit themselves to children's bikes. But as things were worked out, agreed that the process and final rules were sound. Except for the "secondary retention" rule for QRs which IMO causes more problem than it solves.
True it was a mess back then!
veganbikes is offline  
Old 10-15-23, 08:29 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,173
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4475 Post(s)
Liked 1,613 Times in 1,060 Posts
Might be hard to find a modern skewer for a hub width abandoned 25 years ago. Cut it or find old used ones.
Kontact is offline  
Old 10-16-23, 01:58 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
Might be hard to find a modern skewer for a hub width abandoned 25 years ago. Cut it or find old used ones.
Reason I need to get this is I accidentally put an old (unused and mint) one on from some 6speed wheels my father-in-law lent me and I owe him it back

but yeah I have no problem cutting it as long as the threads reach.

This bike is only 12 years old I believe. All the reviews for it date from 2011 onwards. Must have been clearing some old inventory!
choddo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.