FD Cage Modification??
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,595
Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 112 Times
in
85 Posts
FD Cage Modification??
I've got a situation with a XT FD where the cage is out too far in the High position. Looking at the profile of the outer platet "bulges" inward. Wondering about the feasibility of flattening the bulge and making the cages a bit narrower?
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Thoughts?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times
in
2,558 Posts
I've been modifying FD cages a long time. In the old days (pre-CPSC) we took crescent wrenches to bent the front tabs in to speed up shifting. For years I,ve been removing the bolt between the cage plates at the bottom and reinstalling with #4 washers in a shorter stack than the original bushing to improve shifting onto the inner rings of triples. I wouldn't have a second thought about placing the outer cage in a vise and flattening it a little to improve shifting or reduce crank contact. (Unless it is a bulged shape where crushing the bulge would reduce stiffness or strength. Old SunTour, no big deal, new highly shaped Shimano? Maybe not.)
Likes For 79pmooney:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,081
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4417 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
1,031 Posts
Out too far in what way? What's it doing that you don't want, and why is adjusting the angle or hi stop not effective in correcting the problem?
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,595
Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 112 Times
in
85 Posts
The situation is a Surly Ogre with a 73mm BB shell and trying to us a Velo Orange Rando crankset. I can almost make it work but the crank arm is hitting the cage.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,081
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4417 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
1,031 Posts
The part that is hitting is there to provide some cross chain clearance in the granny gear. You will likely find that if you try to flatten that bottom step, the outer cage plate will effectively get longer front to back than it was, causing it to bow out in the middle, with all the clearance and shifting problems that come with that.
A used double front derailleur would be a cheap and easy solution to your problem.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,595
Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 112 Times
in
85 Posts
I came in on this project at our shop after it was started. We have tried a few different BB and have a good chain line. It is the clearance between the chain ring and crank arm that is the problem child.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,490
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
441 Posts
I would measure your chainline to see where you're at, before you start bending (or swapping) the derailleur. I'm going to bet that it's off, which could indeed cause the problem you're describing.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
install a different crankset or a different derailleur..... that crank is wrong for the bike and derailleur combo, period.
you're blaming a well engineered part that is used worldwide, as-is, for a bad decision on another part.
you might be able to find an outdated der. that will kind-of work....something like an LX/DX age der.
once you beat up the der. on the bike now, it will become scrap.
And "Barely enough clearance.... kinda." in the repair stand equals "Not Enough Clearance" when riding the bike.
you're blaming a well engineered part that is used worldwide, as-is, for a bad decision on another part.
you might be able to find an outdated der. that will kind-of work....something like an LX/DX age der.
once you beat up the der. on the bike now, it will become scrap.
And "Barely enough clearance.... kinda." in the repair stand equals "Not Enough Clearance" when riding the bike.
Last edited by maddog34; 10-21-23 at 12:21 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
Does this imply that you changed the crankset but kept the same BB? It sounds like you may have a chainline problem. Sometimes you get lucky, but oftentimes you also need to change the spindle length when you change the bottom bracket.
I would measure your chainline to see where you're at, before you start bending (or swapping) the derailleur. I'm going to bet that it's off, which could indeed cause the problem you're describing.
I would measure your chainline to see where you're at, before you start bending (or swapping) the derailleur. I'm going to bet that it's off, which could indeed cause the problem you're describing.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,490
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
441 Posts
Does this imply that you changed the crankset but kept the same BB? It sounds like you may have a chainline problem. Sometimes you get lucky, but oftentimes you also need to change the spindle length when you change the bottom bracket.
I would measure your chainline to see where you're at, before you start bending (or swapping) the derailleur. I'm going to bet that it's off, which could indeed cause the problem you're describing.
I would measure your chainline to see where you're at, before you start bending (or swapping) the derailleur. I'm going to bet that it's off, which could indeed cause the problem you're describing.
If so, changing a crankset almost always involves moving the front derailleur up or down the seat tube, unless of course the large chainring is the exact same size. With a smaller chainring, the derailleur is going to be too high which could contribute to the problem. Use the "nickle test".
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I've been modifying FD cages a long time. In the old days (pre-CPSC) we took crescent wrenches to bent the front tabs in to speed up shifting. For years I,ve been removing the bolt between the cage plates at the bottom and reinstalling with #4 washers in a shorter stack than the original bushing to improve shifting onto the inner rings of triples. I wouldn't have a second thought about placing the outer cage in a vise and flattening it a little to improve shifting or reduce crank contact. (Unless it is a bulged shape where crushing the bulge would reduce stiffness or strength. Old SunTour, no big deal, new highly shaped Shimano? Maybe not.)
John
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
I'm just suggesting that he checks chainline first. If that's wrong, it's harder to get much of anything else right. Then he's in a better spot to see what's going on. When I hear people talk about bending stuff, it usually means something is off.
He may have simply changed the crankset without changing either the BB or the position of the derailleur on the seat tube. A smaller crankset obviously means you need to lower the FD. It could just be too high. And if it is as simple as moving the derailleur down, he still needs to have a correct chainline if he wants his drivetrain to work well.
I guess I assumed he would have adjusted the FD as well as it could be for that crankset, but that was admittedly a a bad assumption. Without pictures it's hard to know what's really going on.
He may have simply changed the crankset without changing either the BB or the position of the derailleur on the seat tube. A smaller crankset obviously means you need to lower the FD. It could just be too high. And if it is as simple as moving the derailleur down, he still needs to have a correct chainline if he wants his drivetrain to work well.
I guess I assumed he would have adjusted the FD as well as it could be for that crankset, but that was admittedly a a bad assumption. Without pictures it's hard to know what's really going on.
the OP already stated that the Chainline is fine, and i noted that changing it would be futile in this situation.
The Velo Orange crankset is almost certainly a ROAD crank... i'd guess that it may also have Arm clearance issues with the chainstays too... any less than 1/4" is asking for trouble.
i'd like to see the angle and/or radius mismatch between the der and the outer ring, too... i bet it's not right, unless someone already bent the cage in that respect.......
funny thing... no one has asked the tooth counts on the crank rings... or the exact MODEL Number of the Crankset......
i guess bending up a nice FD is much more fun to type about.//
Last edited by maddog34; 10-21-23 at 01:04 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,490
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
441 Posts
I guess I assumed he would have adjusted the FD for that crankset, but that was admittedly a bad assumption as well. Without pictures it's hard to know what's really going on. I wouldn't be so sure that the crankset and derailleur won't work, without seeing it. I have put road cranks on MTB frames with no issue, and without having to change the FD (or worse, bending things). But again, I always start with a good chainline and correct position of the derailleur.
Last edited by Jeff Neese; 10-21-23 at 01:10 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
I missed that it's rubbing on the crank arm. He didn't initially specify what he meant by "too far out". He also didn't initially say that he checked the chainline.
I guess I assumed he would have adjusted the FD for that crankset, but that was admittedly a bad assumption as well. Without pictures it's hard to know what's really going on. I wouldn't be so sure that the crankset and derailleur won't work, without seeing it. I have put road cranks on MTB frames with no issue, and without having to change the FD (or worse, bending things). But again, I always start with a good chainline and correct position of the derailleur.
I guess I assumed he would have adjusted the FD for that crankset, but that was admittedly a bad assumption as well. Without pictures it's hard to know what's really going on. I wouldn't be so sure that the crankset and derailleur won't work, without seeing it. I have put road cranks on MTB frames with no issue, and without having to change the FD (or worse, bending things). But again, I always start with a good chainline and correct position of the derailleur.
we still don't know the tooth counts, model number of crank, or the der. part number....
stock randos have a 46/30 combo... and are a "narrow road" configuration.
the OP needs a flat plate double road FD..... or an old school MTB FD, if shifting is friction type... and some place with a wide selection of old Ders to test fit....... or put a different crankset on the bike... kinda sounds like the rando was chosen, and they're doing what they can to make it work.
answer: Find a more appropriate FD...
#15
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,985
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26427 Post(s)
Liked 10,383 Times
in
7,211 Posts
...would it be possible to post a photo or three of what you have there ? It is true (as has been mentioned already), that not all front derailleurs work well with all cranks and chainrings. (Or work at all, for that matter). Since it is an "inherited" project, maybe it was not well thought out to start with ? Anyway, my apologies for the current state of how threads in mechanics, asking for help with simple problems, all seem to degenerate into a stream of arguments. At this point, I would be reluctant to make any suggestions at all. But I also date back to the days when it was routine practice to bend the leading edge of the flat plates on front derailleur cages, to make them shift much better.
I'm just not really sure that bending will either work well in your case, or is even a good or bad idea.
I think I understand the issue to be: that the cage you have is pretty wide, so in order for the inner plate to contact and push the chain onto the large ring of your double crank, the whole cage ends up so far out that it interferes with the crank arm. I personally would not use bending in such a case. It might work, or it might not. It's possible that rather than flattening the derailleur cage as you are intending, you might get away with bending just the interior leading plate edge, inward, so it throws the chain sooner. Then your cage won't end up so for outboard as to interfere, and you can just use the limit screw to reduce throw. Hard to predict how well that might work.
Also, make sure you've got good alignment of the cage. Sometimes if the derailleur is a little cockeyed on the seat tube, either the front or rear of the cage will interfere with the crank.
__________________
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,081
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4417 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
1,031 Posts
You'll want a very flat outer plate derailleur like this 600EX from 1987.
A braze on version will help because you can use the curved mounting style adapter like below to adjust for your wide chainline. Turn the adapter counter clockwise to the limit of the FD mounting screw to push the FD to the right.
A braze on version will help because you can use the curved mounting style adapter like below to adjust for your wide chainline. Turn the adapter counter clockwise to the limit of the FD mounting screw to push the FD to the right.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,490
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
441 Posts
that first post was a bit vague, eh? i read the others before responding... something i've neglected to do in the past.
we still don't know the tooth counts, model number of crank, or the der. part number....
stock randos have a 46/30 combo... and are a "narrow road" configuration.
the OP needs a flat plate double road FD..... or an old school MTB FD, if shifting is friction type... and some place with a wide selection of old Ders to test fit....... or put a different crankset on the bike... kinda sounds like the rando was chosen, and they're doing what they can to make it work.
answer: Find a more appropriate FD...
we still don't know the tooth counts, model number of crank, or the der. part number....
stock randos have a 46/30 combo... and are a "narrow road" configuration.
the OP needs a flat plate double road FD..... or an old school MTB FD, if shifting is friction type... and some place with a wide selection of old Ders to test fit....... or put a different crankset on the bike... kinda sounds like the rando was chosen, and they're doing what they can to make it work.
answer: Find a more appropriate FD...
The original post gave me definite "newbie" vibes, but then we learn a few posts later that it's at a shop and nobody else can figure it out either. Just the idea of bending the derailleur cage to fix it seems very questionable, coming from a bike shop or bike mechanic. Regardless, I think we're all guessing and can't really help unless we know more, preferably with pictures.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,081
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4417 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
1,031 Posts
You might be right, but I still would like to see some photos. I wouldn't automatically assume the current derailleur won't work without knowing more.
The original post gave me definite "newbie" vibes, but then we learn a few posts later that it's at a shop and nobody else can figure it out either. Just the idea of bending the derailleur cage to fix it seems very questionable, coming from a bike shop or bike mechanic. Regardless, I think we're all guessing and can't really help unless we know more, preferably with pictures.
The original post gave me definite "newbie" vibes, but then we learn a few posts later that it's at a shop and nobody else can figure it out either. Just the idea of bending the derailleur cage to fix it seems very questionable, coming from a bike shop or bike mechanic. Regardless, I think we're all guessing and can't really help unless we know more, preferably with pictures.
The tooth count is somewhat irrelevant since no one made compact chainring specific derailleurs with low clearance outer plates.
The OP should spend $15 on a vintage FD and try an appropriate solution to their crank compatibility problem.
Likes For Kontact:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
A Velo Orange Rando is hardly a low quality 70's style crank. And we don't know anything about the FD except that it's Deore XT - there are different versions and configurations. And of course tooth count matters - that determines the position of the derailleur.
There's nothing "vintage" about this setup. It's a Surly Ogre with a modern crankset. A vintage FD may or may not work. The OP is not sharing any more information and we still do not have pictures.
There's nothing "vintage" about this setup. It's a Surly Ogre with a modern crankset. A vintage FD may or may not work. The OP is not sharing any more information and we still do not have pictures.
personally, i think the arms flex too much. Not a good choice for stompers like me.
Last edited by maddog34; 10-21-23 at 10:30 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,490
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
441 Posts
I'm not guessing. I have dealt with modern FDs on low Q, 70s style cranks before and there isn't room for any sort of curved outer cage plate.
The tooth count is somewhat irrelevant since no one made compact chainring specific derailleurs with low clearance outer plates.
The OP should spend $15 on a vintage FD and try an appropriate solution to their crank compatibility problem.
The tooth count is somewhat irrelevant since no one made compact chainring specific derailleurs with low clearance outer plates.
The OP should spend $15 on a vintage FD and try an appropriate solution to their crank compatibility problem.
There's nothing "vintage" about this setup. It's a Surly Ogre with a modern crankset. A vintage FD may or may not work. The OP is not sharing any more information and we still do not have pictures. Until that happens, everything else is just guessing.
Normally I'd advise him to get the bike to a good shop, but he's saying that he works at a bike shop.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,081
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4417 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
1,031 Posts
A Velo Orange Rando is hardly a low quality 70's style crank. And we don't know anything about the FD except that it's Deore XT - there are different versions and configurations. And of course tooth count matters - that determines the position of the derailleur.
There's nothing "vintage" about this setup. It's a Surly Ogre with a modern crankset. A vintage FD may or may not work. The OP is not sharing any more information and we still do not have pictures. Until that happens, everything else is just guessing.
Normally I'd advise him to get the bike to a good shop, but he's saying that he works at a bike shop.
There's nothing "vintage" about this setup. It's a Surly Ogre with a modern crankset. A vintage FD may or may not work. The OP is not sharing any more information and we still do not have pictures. Until that happens, everything else is just guessing.
Normally I'd advise him to get the bike to a good shop, but he's saying that he works at a bike shop.
A new double FD may work, But old derailleurs definitely work - especially with modern chainrings. A lot of what changed about derailleurs was not to make them work but to make them work with indexing and without trimming.
Likes For Kontact:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,081
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4417 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
1,031 Posts
The OP is doing something uncommon - using a double crank on a tandem, and an unusual one at that. The derailleur is going to be an experiment as well
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,490
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
441 Posts
I don't have to guess, and I already addressed how to get some additional right movement with the derailleur, but the 73mm double chainline is only 46. As plenty of tandems use road triple FDs, I think tandem makers have already addressed derailleur location adequately. There are no tandem specific derailleurs, and brifters tandems can't use MTB derailleurs.
The OP is doing something uncommon - using a double crank on a tandem, and an unusual one at that. The derailleur is going to be an experiment as well
The OP is doing something uncommon - using a double crank on a tandem, and an unusual one at that. The derailleur is going to be an experiment as well
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 705
Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
107 Posts