Shimano 600 ax Rear hub
#1
Shimano 600 ax Rear hub
Hi,
i recently got my hands on a Shimano FH-6361 rear hub. (https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...m=110&AbsPos=7) I want to build up a new rear wheel, but the flange is different to what i know and i am unsure as to how to go a about spoke patterns. I presume a 3 cross is intended (36 hole hub), but the drillings are weird.
Does anyone have experience with this hub?
KR
P!
i recently got my hands on a Shimano FH-6361 rear hub. (https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...m=110&AbsPos=7) I want to build up a new rear wheel, but the flange is different to what i know and i am unsure as to how to go a about spoke patterns. I presume a 3 cross is intended (36 hole hub), but the drillings are weird.
Does anyone have experience with this hub?
KR
P!
Likes For Positron400:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,313
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,149 Times
in
2,449 Posts
IIRC the AX and a year or three's Dura Ace as well had flanges scalloped on every other spoke hole in a manor that allowed all the spokes to exit the flanges in the same direction (elbows out, heads in I think). The rest of the spoking pattern was the common 3x with interlacing. Shimano's thought was that with the elbow on the flange's outside there's more spoke to flange contact and spoke breakage at the elbow would be less frequent.
Before sinking too much time and effort into this hub do the homework on the cassette fit and the freehub body's attachment to the shell. IIRC, again, these hubs used twist tooth, SIS, cassettes w/ the last cog threaded and possibly the old FHB interface. Modding these hubs to fit current cassettes might not be possible. Andy
Before sinking too much time and effort into this hub do the homework on the cassette fit and the freehub body's attachment to the shell. IIRC, again, these hubs used twist tooth, SIS, cassettes w/ the last cog threaded and possibly the old FHB interface. Modding these hubs to fit current cassettes might not be possible. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#3
thanks. So it's just a matter of heads and ellbow orientation. That should be a non-issue. I appreciate the input regarding the hub. I am aware that the spline pattern is different to the HG and the last cog is a thread-on, but that's fine
I'll just file down the splines to fit the freehub of a current 7speed.
![Smilie](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Likes For Positron400:
#4
Hi,
i recently got my hands on a Shimano FH-6361 rear hub. (https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...m=110&AbsPos=7) I want to build up a new rear wheel, but the flange is different to what i know and i am unsure as to how to go a about spoke patterns. I presume a 3 cross is intended (36 hole hub), but the drillings are weird.
Does anyone have experience with this hub?
KR
P!
i recently got my hands on a Shimano FH-6361 rear hub. (https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...m=110&AbsPos=7) I want to build up a new rear wheel, but the flange is different to what i know and i am unsure as to how to go a about spoke patterns. I presume a 3 cross is intended (36 hole hub), but the drillings are weird.
Does anyone have experience with this hub?
KR
P!
Since the spokes are paired at the hub, a small adjustment to spoke length calculation may need to be made, (never used these so just a guess).
![](https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/620x487/shim_ax_dir6_f3b6786471b6beb81c68be7d64c2d921db6a64d6.jpg)
#5
I was wondering about the spoke lengths - when you say, you never used those calculators, how did you do it then? calculate them yourself? (if so, mighty impressive)
Likes For KCT1986:
#7
holy moly - this should be an interesting wheelbuild..
![Twitchy](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/twitchy.gif)
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,313
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,149 Times
in
2,449 Posts
Actually no real difference but for the direction of inserting the second set of spokes into the flange. Do the scalloped holes first. The second flange's spokes are not interacting with flange 1's spokes so it laces up faster than a "normal" wheel would.
I always thought the scallops should have radiated the other way so the outer set of spokes are the pushing ones, not the pulling ones. Andy
I always thought the scallops should have radiated the other way so the outer set of spokes are the pushing ones, not the pulling ones. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#9
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
BITD, many repair manuals had charts of different hub/rim combinations. You’d look up what you had, figure out how many cross, and grab the right length spokes. If it was some unknown combination, you measured things and did the calculations on paper- basic trig is all you need.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#10
The pic of the laced hub posted earlier is from a Shimano catalog showing the design. Attached is other catalog info, probably referring to the possible increase in strength with the 'all elbow out' lacing.
![](https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/371x882/shim_ax_dir6b_39c8dea5bc3de2c9ac8010567945c661282b881d.jpg)
My comment about spoke length was just a thought that occurred to me when looking at the drilling angle & placement. Never had one in hand to determine if it mattered enough to be a concern.
#11
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Of course that was some time in the last millennium. Things were different then.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#12
Senior Member
AX is how I know engineers get high...
#13
I actually really like the design and colour scheme of the hubs. Really the whole groupset sans the water bottle
![Smilie](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,565
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Liked 734 Times
in
414 Posts
Regarding the freehub, you will still need a threaded small Uniglide sprocket to hold the hyperglide sprockets in place.
Likes For sd5782:
#15
Likes For Positron400:
#16
jsallen
Calculating spoke length: the spokes need to be longer, as the holes from which they cross are farther apart. Measure spacing between more distant and closer adjacent spoke holes. Call the smaller spacing a and the larger one b. The spacing to the second hole is a + b, same as it would be with evenly-spaced holes. The difference between even spacing between two adjacent holes and b is
b - (a + b)/2
and half that is added to the length of each of the two spokes pulling in opposite directions:
b/2 - (a + b)/4
or
(2b - a - b)/4
which reduces to
(b - a)/4
Add this to the length you would calculate with evenly-spaced holes. This is approximate, as it assumes that the spokes leave the hub tangentially, but for the small differences in length here, it is close enough. If you want to get fancy about it, multiply by the cosine of the angle at which the spokes leave the flange, relative to tangent to the flange. This would be necessary with a low cross number.
b - (a + b)/2
and half that is added to the length of each of the two spokes pulling in opposite directions:
b/2 - (a + b)/4
or
(2b - a - b)/4
which reduces to
(b - a)/4
Add this to the length you would calculate with evenly-spaced holes. This is approximate, as it assumes that the spokes leave the hub tangentially, but for the small differences in length here, it is close enough. If you want to get fancy about it, multiply by the cosine of the angle at which the spokes leave the flange, relative to tangent to the flange. This would be necessary with a low cross number.
Last edited by jsallen; 12-06-23 at 10:50 PM.